Hollywood
Hollywood’s ultimate streaming war ends with a whimper—and a whopper of a deal
Netflix folds, Paramount wins, and Warner Bros finds itself a new dance partner
NEW YOR & LOS ANGELES: Netflix has blinked. The streaming colossus walked away Thursday from its months-long pursuit of Warner Bros Discovery, handing Paramount Skydance a glittering Hollywood prize and setting up what could be the biggest media merger in years.
The denouement came swiftly. Warner Bros declared Paramount’s sweetened offer of $31 per share “superior” to Netflix’s $27.75 bid, and politely asked the streaming giant to raise its hand. Netflix politely told them where to go.
“At the price required to match Paramount Skydance’s latest offer, the deal is no longer financially attractive,” said co-chief executives Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters, with the studied coolness of men pretending they hadn’t just been outbid by a tech billionaire’s son. “This was always a ‘nice to have’ at the right price, not a ‘must have’ at any price.”
Translation: Larry Ellison scared them off.
The Oracle founder and one of the world’s richest men has been the invisible hand behind Paramount’s relentless pursuit of Warner Bros, bankrolling his son David Ellison’s ambitions with a commitment of $45.7bn in equity—up from $43.6bn previously—plus $57.5bn in debt financing from Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Citi and Apollo. Netflix, for all its swagger, had no appetite for a bidding war with a man who seemingly has no ceiling.
“There’s no point playing chicken with someone who won’t turn the wheel,” said a Netflix adviser, displaying a frankness one rarely hears on Wall Street.
If regulators wave it through, the deal reshapes Hollywood dramatically. Paramount would hoover up Warner Bros’ HBO Max streaming customers into its portfolio, absorb CNN, the Food Network and a clutch of sports rights, and stack them alongside its existing stable of Nickelodeon, CBS and Comedy Central. Two studios, two streaming platforms, two newsrooms—one colossal headache for antitrust watchdogs.
And headaches there will be. California’s attorney-general Rob Bonta has already signalled he’s watching closely, Democratic senators including Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have smelled political favouritism given the Ellisons’ ties to President Donald Trump, and European regulators may yet fancy a say. Paramount has hedged accordingly, raising its break-up fee to $7bn and agreeing to cover the $2.8bn Warner Bros would owe Netflix for ditching their earlier deal.
Warner Bros chief executive David Zaslav, sounding like a man who’d just won the lottery, declared the deal would create “tremendous value” and said he “can’t wait to get started.” David Ellison called it a triumph of “superior value, certainty and speed.”
For Hollywood’s army of writers, directors and crew—already battered by years of production cuts—the champagne will taste rather flat. Mergers of this magnitude invariably come with a chainsaw attached.
Hollywood
Disney chair confident CEO Josh D’Amaro will ‘rise to the occasion’ in Trump–Kimmel row
Board backs new chief as ABC controversy tests leadership early on
NEW YORK: The Walt Disney Company has placed the responsibility of handling the escalating dispute between Donald Trump and late-night host Jimmy Kimmel squarely on its new chief executive, Josh D’Amaro.
Speaking at a business conference in Oslo, Disney chair James Gorman said it would be up to the CEO and his team to determine the company’s response to the controversy surrounding Jimmy Kimmel Live!. He noted that such challenges are not uncommon for large corporations and require careful handling at the leadership level.
The row intensified after both Donald Trump and Melania Trump publicly called for Kimmel’s dismissal following remarks made on his show. The comments, which referenced the First Lady, sparked backlash in the days leading up to a security incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.
Kimmel addressed the issue on-air, clarifying that his joke was intended as a reference to the couple’s age difference and not an incitement to violence. He also expressed sympathy for those affected by the incident and reiterated his stance against violent rhetoric.
Despite mounting pressure, Gorman refrained from offering specific guidance on the future of the show or the host. Instead, he voiced confidence in D’Amaro’s leadership, describing him as “world class” and capable of navigating the situation effectively.
The episode presents an early and high-profile test for D’Amaro, who stepped into the top role just last month. How Disney balances editorial independence, public sentiment and political pressure will likely shape not just the outcome of this controversy, but also the tone of its leadership in the months ahead.
