Brands
Top 10 television advertisers during first 24 weeks of 2017
BENGALURU: Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd (RBIL) and Baba Ramdev’sPatanjaliAyurved Ltd (Patanjali) were the three top advertisers that have been present in all the 24 weekly lists of Broadcast Audience Research Council of India (BARC). All the three players are from the FMCG genre.Overall, 27 advertisers have been present at least for one week in the BARC’s weekly lists of TOP 10 Advertiser Across Genre : All India (U+R) : 2+ Individuals.
HUL leads the pack by far with a total of 27,56,296 ad insertions during the 24 week period, followed by RBIL with 14,00,356 insertions. Patanjali with 5,68,023 insertions (just a fraction above 20 percent of HUL’s ad insertions) is third. Ad insertions by the HUL group would be much higher once the insertions by other companies associated with HUL are added.
The fourth largest advertiser during the period is confectionary giant Cadbury’s India Limited (Cadbury’s) which was present in BARC’s Top 10 advertisers lists for 23 of the first 24 weeks of 2017 – Cadbury’s had insertions of 5,26,685 during the period. HUL’s beverages associate – Brooke Bond Lipton India Limited (Brooke Bond) was fifth in the pecking order with 4,48,054 insertions during the 22 weeks that it was present in BARC’s weekly lists. It may be noted that the sum of insertions mentioned in this paper are the sum of only those numbers when they were present in BARC’s weekly lists of top 10 advertisers. The actual number of insertions will be much higher. Please refer to the figure below for a list of top 10 advertisers during the first 24 weeks of 2014, based on their presence in BARC’s weekly lists of top 10 advertisers
Brands
Jubilant FoodWorks faces Rs 47.5 crore GST demand, plans appeal
Tax authorities flag alleged misclassification of restaurant services
MUMBAI:Â Jubilant FoodWorks Limited has landed in a tax tussle after receiving a GST demand of Rs 47.5 crore from the office of the additional commissioner of CGST and central excise in Thane, Maharashtra.
The order, issued under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, relates to an alleged incorrect classification of certain services under the category of restaurant services. According to the tax authorities, this classification resulted in a short payment of goods and services tax for the period between the financial years 2019-20 and 2021-22.
The demand includes Rs 47.5 crore in GST along with an equal amount as penalty, in addition to applicable interest. The order was received by the company on March 13, 2026.
In a regulatory filing to the BSE Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, the company said it disagrees with the order and believes its arguments were not adequately considered.
The company is preparing to challenge the decision and plans to file an appeal. It added that once the redressal process is complete, the demand is likely to be dropped.
Despite the sizeable figure attached to the notice, the company said it does not expect any material impact on its financials, operations or other activities.
The disclosure was signed by Suman Hegde, EVP and chief financial officer, who confirmed that the company received the order at 19:06 IST on March 13 and has already initiated steps to contest it.
The development places the quick service restaurant major in the middle of a tax debate that could hinge on how certain restaurant-linked services are classified under GST rules. For now, the company appears ready to take the matter from the tax office to the appeals desk.
