MAM
Nourish brings Shetty sisters for its new TVC ‘#SehatKiSunoNourishHiChuno’
Mumbai: In a recently launched television commercial, “#SehatKiSunoNourishHiChuno” from Nourish, fitness icon and Bollywood actor Shilpa Shetty (aka Munki) is seen advising her on-screen and off-screen sister, Shamita Shetty (aka Tunki), on the benefits of consuming only unpolished pulses.
Conceptualised by Leads Brand Connect, the commercial reinforces the importance of choosing the healthiest and most nutritious range of unpolished pulses. The ad intends to showcase the reasons and importance of eating unpolished pulses in comparison to polished pulses.
In the opening scene of the ad, Shamita, dressed as a detective, is trying to look for the polished pulses from the dal box kept in the kitchen, to which Shilpa comments that she will not find any polished seed in the box as they consume Nourish pulses, which are 100 per cent unpolished, hygienic, and healthy. In the second scene, Shilpa advocates that Nourish pulses are nutritious and have high levels of protein. Being vacuum-packed and zip-locked, the freshness and hygiene of the pulses are maintained. Closing in on the lines
#SehatKiSunoNourishHiChuno, Munki puts an end to Tunki’s struggle to find polished dal in Nourish’s unpolished dal and tells her to be smart and make the right choice for her health.
“My staple lunch is always dal, chawal, and roti. I prefer food that is unpolished, high in fiber, and protein-enriched. What I like about Nourish is that its pulses are unpolished; it’s not about how it looks but what it does,” says Nourish’s brand ambassador Shilpa Shetty.
Speaking on the latest ad, BL Agro managing director Ashish Khandelwal commented, “We have always believed in offering nutrition and healthy foods to our customers. Through this ad, we intend to further highlight our uniqueness in packaging the unpolished pulses to keep their freshness intact.”
Leads Brand Connect managing director Richa Khandelwal added, “The ad takes a more quirky approach by showcasing Shilpa Shetty as the nutrition champion while Tunki (Shamita) is slightly jealous of the fact that Munki (Shilpa) is always right. We wanted to create an ad that can keep the viewers engaged to know what exactly Shamita is up to and then highlight the benefits of Nourish.”
With the release of this ad, BL Agro is running a contest called #NourishTunkiMunki on all its social media handles. The company intends to engage existing and prospective customers through this contest, where winners are chosen on a daily basis. The questions of the contest revolve around nutrition and food.
“The best part of the contest is that there will be not one but 100 winners every day. This will keep the excitement and engagement levels high as the chances of winning the Nourish hampers as gifts are higher,” adds Richa.
The hashtags of the contest are “#SehatKiSunoNourishHiChuno” and “#NourishTunkiMunki,” and the tag is @worldofnourish.
MAM
Brands push beyond compliance as trust takes centre stage
ASCI AdTrust Summit 2026 spotlights shift from legal checks to credibility.
MUMBAI: In a world where a disclaimer can be legally sound yet socially suspect, brands are learning that compliance may tick boxes but trust wins markets. At the inaugural ASCI AdTrust Summit 2026, a panel on “Beyond Compliance: The New Currency of Trust” unpacked a growing industry reality: the gap between what the law permits and what consumers accept is widening and fast.
Moderated by Meenakshi Ramkumar of National Law School of India University, the discussion brought together leaders across law, marketing and academia to examine how brands must evolve in a digital ecosystem increasingly shaped by scrutiny, scepticism and speed.
Ramkumar set the tone by highlighting a critical shift, advertising today operates in the same digital space that fuels misinformation, scams and fake news, making credibility harder to establish. “The challenge is not just about what brands do, but the broader context of low institutional trust,” she noted, adding that when violations go unchecked, trust erodes not just in brands but in the regulatory system itself.
This vacuum, she said, has given rise to consumer activism from boycotts to social media backlash as a parallel accountability mechanism.
For Amit Bhasin, Chief Legal Officer at Marico, the distinction was clear, legal compliance is non negotiable, but insufficient. “Compliance is the minimum threshold. The real challenge is staying aligned with changing consumer expectations,” he said.
He pointed to how advertising narratives have evolved from traditional depictions of gender roles to more shared responsibilities reflecting a broader societal shift. “Earlier, it was fine to show one person doing the household work. Today, that may not land well. Consumers expect brands to reflect reality,” Bhasin observed.
He also highlighted internal debates where campaigns that may be legally permissible are still rejected for being culturally insensitive, noting that responsible advertising often requires asking uncomfortable questions before the public does.
If compliance is the baseline, reputation is the battlefield.
Bhasin noted that reputational risk has become a far greater concern than legal exposure, particularly in an era where campaigns can be dissected within hours online. “Earlier, a controversial ad might invite a newspaper editorial. Today, within hours, you’re at the centre of a storm,” he said.
Brands, he added, now evaluate campaigns through a dual lens legal viability and reputational vulnerability with the latter often proving more decisive.
From a healthcare perspective, Satish Sahoo of Cipla Health underscored the complexity of operating within fragmented yet stringent regulatory frameworks, spanning drugs, food, cosmetics and Ayush. “Anything under a drug licence is the most tightly regulated,” he said, adding that this necessitates proactive, not reactive, compliance.
He shared an example from the oral rehydration salts (ORS) category, where Cipla resisted the temptation to position products aggressively despite competitive pressure. “Our product is WHO compliant, and our communication reflects that. We chose not to blur the lines, even if others did,” he noted.
The long term payoff, he suggested, lies in credibility built over consistency, not quick wins.
Yet, as Harsha N of National Law School of India University pointed out, even perfect compliance does not guarantee trust. Drawing from historical and modern examples from exaggerated product claims in the 1800s to contemporary environmental and health advertising, he argued that legal frameworks often lag behind consumer expectations. “A brand can be fully compliant and still be perceived as misleading,” he said, citing instances where fine print disclosures fail to reach or convince the average consumer. He added that larger companies carry a disproportionate responsibility to set ethical benchmarks, even in areas where the law remains silent.
The conversation also turned to digital advertising, where the challenge extends beyond content to how ads are experienced. From algorithmic targeting to personalised messaging, brands now operate in an environment where regulation struggles to keep pace with technology.
Sahoo noted that social media has amplified awareness, with influencers and consumers increasingly scrutinising product claims and calling out inconsistencies. “Awareness has gone up dramatically. People are questioning what goes into products and what brands are saying,” he said.
The role of self regulatory bodies such as Advertising Standards Council of India also came under the spotlight.
Harsha acknowledged that while SROs play a crucial role, they are not immune to criticism, particularly around perceived conflicts of interest and enforcement gaps. “SROs have a higher threshold of responsibility not just to interpret the law, but to anticipate societal expectations,” he said.
He added that failures in self regulation often push the burden back onto government intervention, underscoring the need for stronger, more proactive oversight.
One of the more nuanced debates centred on whether building trust comes at a cost. While Sahoo acknowledged that quality and compliance can increase costs, he argued that companies must absorb them as part of their long term strategy.
Bhasin, however, framed the challenge differently not as cost, but as competitiveness in a market where not all players play by the same rules. “The real tension is when others cut corners and you choose not to,” he said.
The panel concluded with a call to embed trust into business metrics.
Sahoo suggested that organisations must go beyond revenue targets to include consumer equity and trust based KPIs, ensuring that ethical considerations are not sidelined in the pursuit of growth. “Trust sounds abstract, but it can translate into measurable consumer equity,” he said.
As the discussion wrapped up, one message stood out: the rules of advertising are being rewritten not just by regulators, but by consumers themselves. In an ecosystem where attention is fleeting and scepticism is high, brands that merely comply may survive, but those that build trust are the ones that endure.
