Cable TV
Fox or Time Warner: Who will blink first – Time Warner’s attempt to get more money?
BENGALURU: Both the companies have issued official statements about the offer and rejection. Twenty-first Century Fox (Fox) issued a short, cryptic three sentence statement –“21st Century Fox can confirm that we made a formal proposal to Time Warner last month to combine the two companies. The Time Warner Board of Directors declined to pursue our proposal. We are not currently in any discussions with Time Warner.” Fox waited for the appropriate time and made the bid within a few days of Time Warner completing the spinoff of Time Inc., and hence made the target more affordable for Fox.
Speculation continues across media circles globally with some industry pundits claiming that the rejection of the Fox offer was a coy attempt by the Time Warner brass to get more money for the company. Time Warner shares closed last week at above USD 86 per share, already above the estimated USD 85 per share offered by Fox. If Fox wants to build more clout with Pay TV providers it actually is left with little option except to raise its bid, considering the fact that AT&T has announced a USD 49 billion deal to buy DirecTV and the friendly Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger is awaiting approvals. Other suitors could also make a pitch for Time Warner, hence raising the ante further.
As mentioned earlier, Time-Warner had rejected Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox offer allegedly worth about USD 76 billion cash and stock. 21st Century Fox had offered to buy Time Warner for USD 32.42 in cash and offered a ratio of 1.531 Fox class-A share for each Time Warner share.
Time Warner had in a statement last week said that the company was confident that its board’s strategy continues to deliver stockholder value and was superior to any proposal Fox had to offer.
Excerpts of the Time Warner release:
In making its determination, the Time Warner Board considered, among other things, that: The execution of Time Warner’s strategic plan will continue to drive significant and sustainable value for Time Warner stockholders; The unique value of Time Warner’s industry-leading businesses including its portfolio of networks and its film studio and television production business is only going to increase; There is significant risk and uncertainty as to the valuation of Twenty-First Century Fox’s non-voting stock and Twenty-First Century Fox’s ability to govern and manage a combination of the size and scale of Twenty-First Century Fox and Time Warner; and there are considerable strategic, operational, and regulatory risks to executing a combination with Twenty-First Century Fox.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is acting as financial advisor to Time Warner while Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP is acting as legal advisor.
In the meantime, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has set a deadline of 25 August 2014 for those interested in filing comments or petitions to deny the friendly Comcast Corporation (Comcast)-Time Warner Cable Inc., merger. (Time Warner Cable was spun off from Time Warner in 2009). The deal would give Comcast 30 million U.S. homes; about 30 per cent of all the cable households and 40 per cent of the high-speed internet market. In a statement in February 2014, Comcast had said that the stock-for-stock transaction in which Comcast will acquire 100 per cent of Time Warner Cable’s 284.9 million shares outstanding for shares of Comcast amounting to approximately USD 45.2 billion in equity value. Each Time Warner Cable share will be exchanged for 2.875 shares of Comcast, equal to Time Warner Cable shareholders owning approximately 23 per cent of Comcast’s common stock, with a value to Time Warner Cable shareholders of approximately $158.82 per share based on the last closing price of Comcast shares. Comcast also plans to expand its buyback program by an additional USD10 billion.
Cable TV
Hathway Cable appoints Gurjeev Singh Kapoor as CEO
Leadership change comes as cable TV faces shrinking subscriber base and modest earnings pressure
MUMBAI: Hathway Cable and Datacom has tapped industry veteran Gurjeev Singh Kapoor as chief executive officer, marking a leadership pivot at a time when India’s cable television business is under mounting strain.
Kapoor will take over from Tavinderjit Singh Panesar, who is set to retire in August after a long innings with the company. Panesar, chief executive since 2023, has held multiple leadership roles at Hathway, including his latest stint beginning in 2022.
Kapoor brings more than three decades of experience in media and entertainment. He most recently led distribution at The Walt Disney Company’s Star India business, now part of JioStar. His career spans television distribution and affiliate partnerships, with stints at Sony Pictures Networks India, Discovery Communications and Zee Entertainment.
Panesar, with over three decades in the industry, has worked across strategic planning, distribution and business development in media, broadcasting and manufacturing. His past associations include ESPN Star Sports, Star India, Apollo Tyres and JK Industries.
The transition lands as the cable sector grapples with structural disruption. Traditional operators are losing ground to streaming platforms, while telecom and broadband players tighten the squeeze with bundled offerings.
An EY report estimates India’s pay-TV base could shrink by a further 30 to 40 million households by 2030, taking the total down to 71 to 81 million. The slide follows a loss of nearly 40 million homes between 2018 and 2024, a contraction that has already wiped out more than 37,000 jobs in the local cable operator ecosystem.
Hathway’s numbers reflect the strain. The company reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 93 crore for FY25, down from Rs 99 crore a year earlier. Revenue inched up to Rs 2,040 crore from Rs 1,981 crore. As of December 2025, it had about 4.7 million cable TV subscribers and roughly 1.02 million broadband users.
Kapoor steps in with a familiar brief but a shrinking playbook. In a market where viewers are cutting cords faster than companies can reinvent them, the new chief executive inherits a business fighting to stay plugged in.
