MAM
TAM AdEx: Surge in political advertising during Maharashtra assembly elections
Mumbai: As the election season approaches, the advertising landscape witnessed a surge in activity, especially across traditional mediums like TV, print, and radio. A recent report by TAM AdEx, a division of TAM Media Research, delved into the advertising patterns observed during the assembly election periods of September 2023 and October 2024. The report highlighted how political parties have strategically leveraged various media channels to maximize their reach and influence voters.
The analysis focused on the ad insertions and ad volumes across different media platforms, comparing the data from the months leading up to the elections in 2023 and 2024. The study covered a range of advertising categories, primarily focusing on political ads, and provides insights into the evolving strategies adopted by political entities.
The report noticed an increase in advertising across TV, print, and radio, particularly in the months leading up to the elections. Here’s a breakdown of the media usage trends:
● Television remained the most dominant platform, capturing a large share of political ad insertions. This trend is attributed to TV’s extensive reach and ability to engage a wide demographic, making it a preferred medium for political campaigns.
● Print media continued to play a crucial role, especially in regional advertising. Political parties leverage newspapers to reach specific voter bases, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas where print media retains substantial influence.
● Radio also saw a noticeable increase in ad volumes, highlighting its importance as a medium for quick and cost-effective voter engagement, especially in local languages.
The Ad Insertions data from the “Assembl Election – Ad Insertion” sheet reveals some interesting trends:
● In September 2023, there was a moderate volume of ad insertions as political parties started ramping up their campaigns. However, by October 2024, there was a marked increase in ad insertions, indicating a more aggressive approach closer to the election dates.
● The report highlighted that political ads constituted a significant portion of the total ad insertions across all three mediums (TV, print, and radio). This reflects the high stakes of assembly elections and the need for parties to maintain visibility across multiple channels.
The data from the “Assembly Election – Ad Volume” sheet further elaborates on the share of ad volumes:
● There was a noticeable shift in ad volumes between the two years, with October 2024 showing a higher volume compared to September 2023. This could be attributed to the heightened competition among political parties and the increasing significance of assembly elections in shaping state politics.
● The increase in ad volumes suggested a growing emphasis on broadcast and print advertising as key components of election strategies. This aligns with the broader trend of political parties investing heavily in mass media to sway public opinion.
The report also highlighted the distribution of ad insertions based on the per cent share of different media:
● TV dominated the share of political ad insertions, followed by print and then radio. This aligns with the general perception that visual media has a stronger impact on viewers, especially during the election season.
● The increased usage of radio in 2024 indicates a renewed interest in using audio channels to reach voters in rural and semi-urban areas. Radio’s localized nature allows political parties to tailor their messages to specific regions, making it a powerful tool for regional outreach.
The comparative data between September 2023 and October 2024 reveals some strategic shifts in political advertising:
● There was a clear escalation in ad spending as parties approached the 2024 assembly elections, indicating a more robust and aggressive campaign strategy. This aligns with the broader trend of political campaigns becoming more media-centric, leveraging high-frequency ad insertions to dominate the airwaves.
● The report also suggested that political parties are increasingly adopting a multi-channel approach, utilising a mix of TV, print, and radio to ensure widespread voter engagement.
MAM
Brands push beyond compliance as trust takes centre stage
ASCI AdTrust Summit 2026 spotlights shift from legal checks to credibility.
MUMBAI: In a world where a disclaimer can be legally sound yet socially suspect, brands are learning that compliance may tick boxes but trust wins markets. At the inaugural ASCI AdTrust Summit 2026, a panel on “Beyond Compliance: The New Currency of Trust” unpacked a growing industry reality: the gap between what the law permits and what consumers accept is widening and fast.
Moderated by Meenakshi Ramkumar of National Law School of India University, the discussion brought together leaders across law, marketing and academia to examine how brands must evolve in a digital ecosystem increasingly shaped by scrutiny, scepticism and speed.
Ramkumar set the tone by highlighting a critical shift, advertising today operates in the same digital space that fuels misinformation, scams and fake news, making credibility harder to establish. “The challenge is not just about what brands do, but the broader context of low institutional trust,” she noted, adding that when violations go unchecked, trust erodes not just in brands but in the regulatory system itself.
This vacuum, she said, has given rise to consumer activism from boycotts to social media backlash as a parallel accountability mechanism.
For Amit Bhasin, Chief Legal Officer at Marico, the distinction was clear, legal compliance is non negotiable, but insufficient. “Compliance is the minimum threshold. The real challenge is staying aligned with changing consumer expectations,” he said.
He pointed to how advertising narratives have evolved from traditional depictions of gender roles to more shared responsibilities reflecting a broader societal shift. “Earlier, it was fine to show one person doing the household work. Today, that may not land well. Consumers expect brands to reflect reality,” Bhasin observed.
He also highlighted internal debates where campaigns that may be legally permissible are still rejected for being culturally insensitive, noting that responsible advertising often requires asking uncomfortable questions before the public does.
If compliance is the baseline, reputation is the battlefield.
Bhasin noted that reputational risk has become a far greater concern than legal exposure, particularly in an era where campaigns can be dissected within hours online. “Earlier, a controversial ad might invite a newspaper editorial. Today, within hours, you’re at the centre of a storm,” he said.
Brands, he added, now evaluate campaigns through a dual lens legal viability and reputational vulnerability with the latter often proving more decisive.
From a healthcare perspective, Satish Sahoo of Cipla Health underscored the complexity of operating within fragmented yet stringent regulatory frameworks, spanning drugs, food, cosmetics and Ayush. “Anything under a drug licence is the most tightly regulated,” he said, adding that this necessitates proactive, not reactive, compliance.
He shared an example from the oral rehydration salts (ORS) category, where Cipla resisted the temptation to position products aggressively despite competitive pressure. “Our product is WHO compliant, and our communication reflects that. We chose not to blur the lines, even if others did,” he noted.
The long term payoff, he suggested, lies in credibility built over consistency, not quick wins.
Yet, as Harsha N of National Law School of India University pointed out, even perfect compliance does not guarantee trust. Drawing from historical and modern examples from exaggerated product claims in the 1800s to contemporary environmental and health advertising, he argued that legal frameworks often lag behind consumer expectations. “A brand can be fully compliant and still be perceived as misleading,” he said, citing instances where fine print disclosures fail to reach or convince the average consumer. He added that larger companies carry a disproportionate responsibility to set ethical benchmarks, even in areas where the law remains silent.
The conversation also turned to digital advertising, where the challenge extends beyond content to how ads are experienced. From algorithmic targeting to personalised messaging, brands now operate in an environment where regulation struggles to keep pace with technology.
Sahoo noted that social media has amplified awareness, with influencers and consumers increasingly scrutinising product claims and calling out inconsistencies. “Awareness has gone up dramatically. People are questioning what goes into products and what brands are saying,” he said.
The role of self regulatory bodies such as Advertising Standards Council of India also came under the spotlight.
Harsha acknowledged that while SROs play a crucial role, they are not immune to criticism, particularly around perceived conflicts of interest and enforcement gaps. “SROs have a higher threshold of responsibility not just to interpret the law, but to anticipate societal expectations,” he said.
He added that failures in self regulation often push the burden back onto government intervention, underscoring the need for stronger, more proactive oversight.
One of the more nuanced debates centred on whether building trust comes at a cost. While Sahoo acknowledged that quality and compliance can increase costs, he argued that companies must absorb them as part of their long term strategy.
Bhasin, however, framed the challenge differently not as cost, but as competitiveness in a market where not all players play by the same rules. “The real tension is when others cut corners and you choose not to,” he said.
The panel concluded with a call to embed trust into business metrics.
Sahoo suggested that organisations must go beyond revenue targets to include consumer equity and trust based KPIs, ensuring that ethical considerations are not sidelined in the pursuit of growth. “Trust sounds abstract, but it can translate into measurable consumer equity,” he said.
As the discussion wrapped up, one message stood out: the rules of advertising are being rewritten not just by regulators, but by consumers themselves. In an ecosystem where attention is fleeting and scepticism is high, brands that merely comply may survive, but those that build trust are the ones that endure.
