Applications
Auction route better but not only way to allocate spectrum: SC
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today said that the auction route is not the only method for allocating natural resources like spectrum.
Responding to a Presidential Reference following the verdict on the 2G spectrum allocation earlier this year, the five-judge apex court bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia said auction could be a better option where the aim is maximisation of revenue, but then “every method other than auction of natural resources cannot be shut down”.
Justice D K Jain said “auction could not be elevated as a constitutional mandate”.
However, the Court said it cannot go into the wisdom of the executive in policy matters and decide on which is the most suitable method of allocating natural resources. The court said it does not have the expertise to decide which method is suitable for the disposal of a particular natural resource.
The economic policy of the government can only be struck down if it is found to be arbitrary and capricious, the court said.
In a separate but concurring judgment, Justice J S Kehar gave his additional reasons in respect on question one and four of the presidential reference.
The court did not answer three questions relating to the 2G verdict of February 2012 by which it had cancelled 121 2G licences.
Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal said later that the apex court has brought “constitutional clarity” on the issue.
Institutions like CAG “might have perhaps unwittingly, erroneously interpreted the S C judgment relating to the 2G case and thought that all natural resources must be auctioned,” he said. “The SC has provided constitutional clarity today and we welcome it.”
Commerce Minister Anand Sharma said the judgment “vindicates” the position that the government had taken. “When a state has to take decisions, public good has to be kept in mind… The SC has also upheld, that it is public good which is important, and revenue maximisation is subservient to that, not the other way round,” he said. “And all national resources (are) not meant to be auctioned.”
The presidential reference on the judgment of of 2 February was filed on 12 April and hearing on it began on 11 May.
Of the 12 questions raised in the reference, the government sought the court‘s opinion on whether auctioning was the only permissible method for the disposal of all natural resources.
The reference asked whether following the auction route for the disposal of natural resources was not contrary to earlier judgments of the Supreme Court.
In the 2 February judgment canceling 122 licences issues by then Telecom Minister A Raja, the apex court had said if scarce natural resources like spectrum were to be alienated by the state, then the only legal method was transparent public auction. The apex court, while holding that ‘first come, first served‘ policy was flawed, cancelled the licences.
FICCI welcomed the Judgment on the Presidential Reference. FICCI Vice President Sidharth Birla said, “While we have yet to read the full Judgment, prima facie FICCI‘s stand on allocation of natural resources is today vindicated by the Supreme Court. We are now looking forward to a more predictable policy environment for allocation of natural resources as many projects were pending for the want of clear direction on allocation principles for natural resources in the wake of this Judgment”
In the affidavit filed in the Supreme Court, FICCI had submitted that auctions can play a valuable role in the price discovery process when price discovery is the sole consideration in making such sale of resources. “However, we had also said that while auctions are indeed a valuable method of allocating natural resources but they are not the only methods and can be complemented with various other allocation methods”, said Birla.
“We hope that subsequent to this Judgment, irrespective of the method followed, essential criteria namely transparency, clear regulatory and licensing framework, non-discretionary procedures are adhered to so as to obtain the maximum benefit arising from the allocation of nation‘s wealth of natural resources”, said Birla.
Applications
Inshorts Group chief Deepit Purkayastha joins IAB video council for Southeast Asia and India
The co-founder and chief executive of the short-form content platform has been inducted into the IAB SEA+India Video Council, giving India a stronger voice in shaping digital video frameworks
NOIDA: India has long been the world’s most chaotic, multilingual and mobile-first digital market. Now, one of its most prominent short-video executives is getting a seat at the table where the rules are written.
Deepit Purkayastha, co-founder and chief executive of Inshorts Group, has been selected as a member of the IAB SEA+India Video Council for 2026. Run by the Interactive Advertising Bureau, the council brings together senior leaders from Southeast Asia and India to shape standards, best practices and measurement frameworks for the fast-evolving video and digital advertising ecosystem.
The timing is pointed. According to the IAMAI-Kantar Internet in India Report 2025, over 588 million Indians are now consuming short-video content, with growth increasingly driven by rural and non-metro audiences. India’s active internet user base has crossed 950 million, with 57 per cent of users now coming from rural markets. Yet the frameworks that govern how video consumption is measured and monetised were largely designed for single-language, Western markets and have struggled to keep pace with the scale, diversity and complexity of India’s digital landscape.
Purkayastha is no stranger to these debates. He already serves on the AI Council at Marketing and Media Alliance India and as co-chair of the Digital Entertainment Committee at the Internet and Mobile Association of India. His induction into the IAB SEA+India Video Council extends that influence into the global video standards arena.
Inshorts Group sits squarely at the intersection of these forces. Its flagship product, Inshorts, India’s highest-rated short news app, reaches 12 million active users with 60-word news summaries. Its sister platform, Public App, reaches 80 million monthly active users across more than 700 districts and 12 languages, serving communities that most global platforms barely register.
Purkayastha said the opportunity was about building something more representative. “India today sits at the centre of the global video ecosystem, but the frameworks that define how value is created and measured have not always kept pace with the realities of our market,” he said. “Being part of the IAB SEA+India Video Council is an opportunity to contribute to a more representative and future-ready approach, one that accounts for diversity in language, context, and user intent.”
As a council member, Purkayastha will contribute to shaping regional standards across video advertising, measurement and platform governance, with a focus on frameworks that are native to India’s multilingual, mobile-first ecosystem rather than imported from global benchmarks designed elsewhere.
For years, India has been content to play by rules written for other markets. Purkayastha’s induction is a signal that it is done waiting to be consulted and ready to start writing them.
