Education
ImmigToronto is here to make your Canadian immigration ‘hassle-free’
Canada is rightly known as a land of opportunities. It has a plethora of work opportunities for aspiring immigrants. With its multiculturalism, rich lifestyle, political stability, and tolerant policies, Canada has become a hotspot for newcomers.
Are you also making plans to settle in Canada? Do you want to know which is the most feasible and fastest way to immigrate to Canada?
It is the Express Entry Immigration Program.
Canada conducts frequent express entry draws to issue an ITA (invitation to apply) for permanent residence to potential aspirants.
EXPRESS ENTRY DRAW CANADA
The Express Entry Draw is an electronic system that selects potential candidates for submitting an application for Canadian Permanent Residency. The express entry process is based on ranks and scores. If you get high points, as per the Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) after submitting your profile, you’ll be invited to apply by IRCC to apply for permanent residency. The government has set up a tie-break rule in order to rank candidates with the same CRS scores. As a result, people who’ve applied before the tie-break date and time get the preference.
The CRS score depends on a variety of factors including age, education, post-Secondary degree, proficiency in language, Canadian education certification, Canadian and foreign work experience.
Are you on the lookout for Canadian PR experts?
If yes, ImmigToronto can serve you to have a smooth journey towards acquiring Canadian PR. ImmigToronto holds a good record in the successful conversion of Canada PR applications.
ImmigToronto has its offices spread across Toronto, Florida, and Stockholm and has managed to provide assistance to immigration cases in Asian, Latin, and Gulf countries. It is an efficient team of RCIC (Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant) and licensed Immigration Lawyer that ensures complete authenticity as far as acquiring Canadian permanent residency is concerned.
Further, applicants thinking to get assistance through ImmigToronto need not worry about the fee in case they turn out ineligible for their PR application process, as the fee would be fully refundable in such cases. Apart from this, Immig Toronto ensures encrypted transactions and complete data privacy.
Also, the feedback pertaining to positive Immig Toronto reviews makes it a prominent choice among the new immigrants.
So, what are you waiting for? Get in touch with ImmigToronto today – your reliable solution to actualize your dreams!
Education
Delhi High Court orders Law Prep Tutorial to stop using CLAT topper’s identity
Google and Meta have 72 hours to pull content that a judge called a defamatory campaign against a rival coaching firm.
DELHI: India’s fiercely competitive law-entrance coaching industry has landed in court, and a Delhi judge has wasted little time in drawing battle lines.
The Delhi high court on April 13th passed an ad-interim order in favour of Toprankers EdTech Solutions Private Limited, which runs the coaching platform LegalEdge, and Geetali Gupta, the student who secured All India Rank 1 in the Common Law Admission Test 2026. The order, passed by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, restrains LPT EdTech Private Limited, which operates under the name Law Prep Tutorial, from using Gupta’s name, images or identity in any form across digital platforms.
A topper, a turf war and a rejected sponsorship deal
The dispute has its roots in a familiar story: a prized student, two rival coaching firms, and a falling-out over who gets the credit. According to the plaintiffs’ submissions, Gupta was enrolled in LegalEdge’s Champions Batch I programme and had credited the platform publicly for her result. Her association with Law Prep Tutorial was, the court was told, limited to mock tests and a handful of classes.
Following the declaration of results, Law Prep Tutorial allegedly approached Gupta and her family with an offer to sponsor her five-year college fees in exchange for exclusive association. The family declined. What followed, the plaintiffs say, was a sustained digital campaign against LegalEdge and against Gupta herself.
Content published across YouTube, LinkedIn, blogs and other social media platforms included a video titled “CLAT 2026 AIR 1 Geetali Gupta Controversy Exposed” and a blog post styled as an exposé of the rivalry between the two firms. The plaintiffs alleged these contained defamatory statements accusing LegalEdge of fraud, unethical practices and making false claims about toppers. AI-generated and morphed images were also said to have been circulated, including material falsely associating Gupta with Law Prep Tutorial and depicting LegalEdge’s directors in a damaging light.
What the court found
At the prima facie stage, Justice Gedela found that the blogs, posts, reels and other material on record appeared disparaging and designed to damage LegalEdge’s reputation. The defendants, the court observed, had prima facie carried out a defamatory campaign using content that appeared to have been published wilfully. The use of Gupta’s name and likeness, including AI-generated material, was found unjustified, particularly given that she had publicly credited LegalEdge and had asked the defendants to stop using her name. The court noted pointedly that the student had been drawn into the dispute as a “pawn.”
The orders
The directions are sweeping. Law Prep Tutorial and associated persons are restrained from publishing, sharing or disseminating any defamatory or derogatory content against LegalEdge across any digital platform. They are further barred from using Gupta’s name, identity or images in any form, including AI-generated or manipulated content. They are also prohibited from deleting or tampering with any internal data or communications relating to the campaign.
Critically, Google and Meta, covering YouTube, Facebook and Instagram, have been directed to disable, block access to, remove or suspend all identified content within 72 hours of the order being uploaded. The case, numbered CS(COMM) 344/2026, is listed before the joint registrar on July 14th and before the court on August 24th. Toprankers was represented by senior advocate J. Sai Deepak, alongside Ankur Khandelwal, Ravi Vaswani and Anchit Oswal, briefed by Zentrum Law Partners.
The case is a sharp reminder that in India’s cutthroat test-preparation industry, the fight for a topper’s endorsement can end up costing far more than a college sponsorship ever would.
