Education
Here’s How to Pick the Best Child Education Plan for Your Young Ones
Every child deserves quality education. Not only does it open up lucrative avenues for their future, but it also helps in developing their personality. However, providing quality education to your children can be quite expensive. This is why, parents who have big ambitions for their young ones take early steps to cater to these expenses.
While there are various ways to save up for your child’s education, buying one of the best child education plans has proven to be the most effective. Child education plans allow systematic and disciplined, goal-based investments that offer returns in a time-effective manner.
But choosing the best child education plan can be tricky. You need to opt for a plan that not only acts as a savings plan and investment plan, but also offers coverage to your child in case of your untimely demise. In addition to this, there are a few other things that you need to keep in mind to make sure you’re getting your hands on the best child education plan. Let’s take a look at few of these factors.
1. Look for a Plan that Offers Premium Waiver Benefits
The best child education plans come with a premium waiver benefit. This means that in case of the untimely demise of a policy holder, the insurer would waive off the future premiums and continue to provide coverage till maturity. This feature is essential as it helps keep financial stress at bay and allows children to follow their educational dreams despite an unfortunate incident.
2. Choose a Plan That Offers Flexibility of Term
Even the best child education plan would not be able to be of much use if it doesn’t offer the required financial help in time. This is why, you should opt for an education plan that offers flexibility to choose the term. This way you can plan the term of your policy according to the educational goals of your child and get the required amount exactly when you need it.
3. Various Payout Options
When purchasing a child education plan, you can select between an endowment and a money-back option. Let’s take a closer look at these alternatives.
● Money Back Option – With the money-back option, you will get guaranteed payments in the form of a percentage of sum assured at regular intervals to meet your child’s educational requirements. You will get an assured maturity amount at the time of maturity, which you may utilise to fund your child’s further education expenses.
● Endowment Option – In contrast, with an endowment plan, you will get a guaranteed lump-sum payment at maturity. This sum can be used to cover greater expenditures such as overseas education.
You should opt for an education plan that lets you choose between these alternatives, giving you the flexibility to invest as per your risk appetite.
4. Go for a Reliable Insurance Provider
When you’re looking for one of the best child education plans to secure your young one’s future, you must choose a reliable insurance provider. You should consider a trusted name in the industry with an impressive claim settlement ratio. Choosing such an insurance provider ensures that your valid claims are settled in a hassle-free manner and you, or your nominees don’t need to go through any hassles in getting your rightful claims.
Wrapping Up
Every parent has a dream of providing the best education to their child. But sometimes because of a lack of a proper savings plan these dreams stay unfulfilled. So, having a savings plan in hand can help your child succeed in chasing their dreams. You should do a proper study of the available plans to select the best savings plan in the market. Getting the best child education plan enables you to live your dream of providing your child with quality education and allows your young ones to live to their fullest potential.
Education
Delhi High Court orders Law Prep Tutorial to stop using CLAT topper’s identity
Google and Meta have 72 hours to pull content that a judge called a defamatory campaign against a rival coaching firm.
DELHI: India’s fiercely competitive law-entrance coaching industry has landed in court, and a Delhi judge has wasted little time in drawing battle lines.
The Delhi high court on April 13th passed an ad-interim order in favour of Toprankers EdTech Solutions Private Limited, which runs the coaching platform LegalEdge, and Geetali Gupta, the student who secured All India Rank 1 in the Common Law Admission Test 2026. The order, passed by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, restrains LPT EdTech Private Limited, which operates under the name Law Prep Tutorial, from using Gupta’s name, images or identity in any form across digital platforms.
A topper, a turf war and a rejected sponsorship deal
The dispute has its roots in a familiar story: a prized student, two rival coaching firms, and a falling-out over who gets the credit. According to the plaintiffs’ submissions, Gupta was enrolled in LegalEdge’s Champions Batch I programme and had credited the platform publicly for her result. Her association with Law Prep Tutorial was, the court was told, limited to mock tests and a handful of classes.
Following the declaration of results, Law Prep Tutorial allegedly approached Gupta and her family with an offer to sponsor her five-year college fees in exchange for exclusive association. The family declined. What followed, the plaintiffs say, was a sustained digital campaign against LegalEdge and against Gupta herself.
Content published across YouTube, LinkedIn, blogs and other social media platforms included a video titled “CLAT 2026 AIR 1 Geetali Gupta Controversy Exposed” and a blog post styled as an exposé of the rivalry between the two firms. The plaintiffs alleged these contained defamatory statements accusing LegalEdge of fraud, unethical practices and making false claims about toppers. AI-generated and morphed images were also said to have been circulated, including material falsely associating Gupta with Law Prep Tutorial and depicting LegalEdge’s directors in a damaging light.
What the court found
At the prima facie stage, Justice Gedela found that the blogs, posts, reels and other material on record appeared disparaging and designed to damage LegalEdge’s reputation. The defendants, the court observed, had prima facie carried out a defamatory campaign using content that appeared to have been published wilfully. The use of Gupta’s name and likeness, including AI-generated material, was found unjustified, particularly given that she had publicly credited LegalEdge and had asked the defendants to stop using her name. The court noted pointedly that the student had been drawn into the dispute as a “pawn.”
The orders
The directions are sweeping. Law Prep Tutorial and associated persons are restrained from publishing, sharing or disseminating any defamatory or derogatory content against LegalEdge across any digital platform. They are further barred from using Gupta’s name, identity or images in any form, including AI-generated or manipulated content. They are also prohibited from deleting or tampering with any internal data or communications relating to the campaign.
Critically, Google and Meta, covering YouTube, Facebook and Instagram, have been directed to disable, block access to, remove or suspend all identified content within 72 hours of the order being uploaded. The case, numbered CS(COMM) 344/2026, is listed before the joint registrar on July 14th and before the court on August 24th. Toprankers was represented by senior advocate J. Sai Deepak, alongside Ankur Khandelwal, Ravi Vaswani and Anchit Oswal, briefed by Zentrum Law Partners.
The case is a sharp reminder that in India’s cutthroat test-preparation industry, the fight for a topper’s endorsement can end up costing far more than a college sponsorship ever would.
