High Court
LMOs victor as Bombay HC directs TRAI to settle interconnect issue
MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court today (1 September, 2015) issued direction to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to settle the Interconnect Agreement (ICA) issue between last mile owners (LMOs) and multi system operators (MSOs) within two weeks. A report has to be submitted to the TRAI on the proceedings in 30 days.
“All LMOs are advised not to sign the one sided Interconnect Agreement of all MSOs. If the LMO has already signed without understanding the same and if the MSO has not given a copy of the Interconnect Agreement with their company seal and signature within 15 days of signing the same then the Interconnect Agreement is null and void,” said Maharashtra Cable Operators Federation (MCOF) in a statement.
Speaking to Indiantelevision.com MCOF president Arvind Prabhu said, “This is a victory for the last mile operators who were constantly denied their dues. It’s the LMOs who do all the hard work in maintaining a cordial relationship with the consumers and growing the customer base, but MSOs are not ready to acknowledge this. We want a justified proposition through which the last mile operators will get their due.”
“We want an agreement, which will be a balanced proposition between all the stakeholders. We want to have a transparent ecosystem where there is clarity on every aspect including revenue system. Ignoring LMOs or not giving them their due certainly cannot be the way forward,” added Prabhu.
“A just and fair ICA will now be drafted under the supervision of the Hon. Bombay High Court by TRAI and parties involved. All MSOs are to be made parties in this matter by MCOF so that there is a common just and fair Interconnect Agreement for all LMOs across India,” MCOF said in the statement.
High Court
Bombay HC likely to protect Kartik Aaryan’s personality rights
Actor seeks Rs 15 crore damages over AI misuse, deepfakes and merch
MUMBAI: In an age where faces can be faked and voices cloned, even stardom needs legal armour. The Bombay High Court has indicated it will pass an order safeguarding the personality and publicity rights of Bollywood actor Kartik Aaryan, following allegations of widespread digital misuse of his identity.
The matter, heard by Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh, centres on a plea filed by Aaryan seeking a broad John Doe injunction against 16 defendants, including e-commerce platforms, social media intermediaries and unidentified entities. The court noted the concerns raised and said appropriate orders would be issued.
At the heart of the case lies the growing threat of artificial intelligence-driven impersonation. Aaryan’s petition flags multiple instances of deepfake content circulating across platforms such as YouTube and Instagram, where his likeness has allegedly been used to create fabricated videos, including false romantic link-ups and objectionable scenarios designed to drive engagement.
In one particularly alarming example, the actor’s legal filing cites AI-generated visuals that falsely associate him with controversial global figures, including Jeffrey Epstein. The plea argues that such content not only misleads audiences but also causes serious reputational damage.
The concerns extend beyond content to commerce. The suit alleges that unauthorised merchandise bearing Aaryan’s name and image is being sold across platforms such as Amazon, Flipkart and Redbubble, without his consent. Additionally, the actor has raised red flags over AI-powered chatbots that mimic his voice and simulate conversations, warning of potential misuse in fraudulent activities.
Aaryan’s filing underscores that he is the registered proprietor of the trademark “Kartik Aaryan”, with his name, voice and likeness carrying significant commercial value. The unauthorised use of these attributes, the plea states, leads to “immediate and irreparable harm” to his goodwill.
Seeking both preventive and punitive relief, the actor has requested a permanent injunction restraining entities from exploiting his identity in any form be it name, voice, signature or distinctive dialogue style. He has also sought damages amounting to Rs 15 crore for alleged commercial misappropriation and reputational loss.
The case highlights a larger legal and cultural moment, where the lines between reality and replication are increasingly blurred. As AI tools become more accessible, courts are now being called upon to define the boundaries of identity in the digital age, where a face may be famous, but control over it is no longer guaranteed.
