News Broadcasting
I&B ready to re-examine FTA package costing in CAS
NEW DELHI: Even as broadcasters and cable operators disagreed over pricing of the basic tier of free to air channels in a post-conditional access regime at meeting yesterday (Friday), the government has agreed to revisit an analysis of the probable costing of the basic tier undertaken earlier by the finance ministry that had said the price should be in the region of Rs 50 (exclusive of local taxes) per month.
The government has also suggested that broadcasters, MSOs, cable operators should sit down and sort out differences on issues like piracy, auditing of subscriber base and distribution margins for MSOs.
Though government sources and some panel members insisted that the over three-hour meeting of the task force on CAS was carried out in a friendly atmosphere, a collation of information done by indiantelevision.com suggests that there were several areas of disagreement and the cable operators staunchly opposed any move by broadcasters to keep the price of the basic tier low.
ESPN India’s country head Manu Sawhney, who represented the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF), according to industry sources, suggested in the task force meeting, attended by about 16 people, that the pricing of the basic tier should be around Rs. 25/month/susbcriber. He also said the pricing should be arrived at as soon as possible with the rollout of CAS in non-metro cities being done within three months of the first phase implementation.
While some other members of the task force agreed with some IBF viewpoints, the cable operators strongly opposed the suggestion and alleged that a low price of basic tier would make the business of cable operators unviable and pave the way for closures and takeovers. The meeting was chairted by joint secretary (broadcasting) in the I&B ministry Rakesh Mohan,
Rakesh Dutta of the Cable Networks’ Association and one of the several independent cable op in the task force, told indiantelevision.com today: “We strongly oppose IBF and Sawhney’s posturing and we would start a stir if the basic tier price is below Rs 150/month.”
He added: “I also told him (Sawhney) during the meeting that broadcasters should not try to dictate the business terms to a cable op as the latter does not interfere with the way a broadcaster does its business.”
Another cable operator task force member, Roop Sharma, said, “The cable operators are united on the issue. We want CAS to be implemented soon, but a low price of the basic tier is not acceptable to us. Broadcasters are attempting to make sure that more pay channels can be accommodated by a consumer in his monthly cable subscription outflow if the basic tier is cheap.”
The cable ops’ point of view was that the basic tier should be around Rs 150/month/susbcriber. A memorandum was also submitted to the ministry by cable operators that put across their views on the matter.
The meeting, according to sources, was conducted in strict accordance of the agenda set out, but mini-flare-ups could not be avoided. Dutta is reported to have retorted to Sawhney’s suggestion of a low priced FTA channel package that if the broadcasters were ready to sell air time at the rate of Rs 25/10 seconds on various channels, cable operators would agree to the basic tier price being Rs 25/month.
Adding spice to the lack of consensus on this were the consumer activists. One of the three activists on the panel, Mumbai’s Varsha Raut, observed that at present on an average consumers are getting about 80 channels (both FTA and pay ) for a price between Rs 150 – Rs 200/month. If the total cost of cable television to a consumer exceeded Rs 200/month (inclusive of pay channels), it would not be acceptable to them, Raut is understood to have conveyed to the meeting.
Those who attended yesterday’s meeting included Sawhney, Essel Group’s additional vice-chairman Jawahar Goel, Hathway’s K. Jayaraman, INCableNet’s Rajiv Vyas, RPG’s A Datta, Siti Cable’s Rajeev Khattar, a representative from Sumangali (Sun TV’s parent company), electronic goods manufacturing companies’ apex body CETMA’s Suresh Khanna, and Thomson India’s Sanjiv Kainth, apart from several consumer activists and independent cable operators from Delhi, Mumbai, Calcutta and Chennai.
When MSOs and cable operators were asked whether they had placed orders for set-top boxes (STBs), some of them said this could not be done till a business plan was made and that could only be done when it was clear what would be the composition of the basic tier and the number of channels that would form part of the free to air channels.
The government representative is understood to have conveyed to all that broadcasters should come out with the number of FTA channels within 10-12 days (when the next meeting is likely to take place) in the various bouquets to enable other stakeholders of the industry to firm business plans.
CETMA was of the opinion that both digital and analog set-top boxes can be made available, indigenously manufactured and assembled from SKD (semi-knocked down) kits, within 12-16 months of placing orders. The CETMA representative is also reported to have opined that an analog STB can be had for about Rs 1,500, while digital STBs may cost up to Rs 4,000 (inclusive of various duties) apiece.
The industry has also petitioned the government to waive various duties on import of STB components — an issue, Mohan pointed out, that has been taken up with the finance ministry.
At the meeting it was also suggested — and also agreed upon by most people — that broadcasters should devote some time on their various channels to educate viewers about CAS, pricing of pay channels and other issues involved.
The meeting ended with a warning from Mohan that the implementation of CAS and the deadline fixed would be pursued by the government zealously and soon officials at state-levels would be nominated whose role would be to monitor CAS implementation and take action against errant parties.
News Broadcasting
Network18 Q4 revenue grows 9.7 per cent, EBITDA at Rs 30 crore
PAT improves to Rs 306.6 crore, margins steady amid cost pressures.
MUMBAI: Not all news is breaking, some of it is quietly improving. Network18 Media & Investments Limited appears to be doing just that, tightening losses and stabilising margins even as costs continue to weigh on the business. For FY26, the company reported revenue from operations of Rs 1,955.1 crore, up from Rs 1,896.2 crore in FY25, signalling modest top-line growth in a challenging media environment. Total income stood at Rs 1,978.2 crore, compared to Rs 1,913 crore a year earlier.
Profit after tax came in at Rs 306.6 crore for the year, a sharp turnaround from Rs 3,225.4 crore in FY25, largely reflecting the absence of large exceptional items that had inflated the previous year’s numbers. On a more comparable basis, the company’s operating performance showed signs of gradual stabilisation.
However, the quarterly picture remained under pressure. For the March quarter, Network18 reported a loss of Rs 53.1 crore, narrower than the Rs 98.1 crore loss in the same period last year, but still indicative of ongoing cost challenges.
Expenses continued to track high. Total expenses for FY26 stood at Rs 2,235.7 crore, up from Rs 2,197.8 crore in FY25. Key cost heads included operational expenses of Rs 765.9 crore, employee benefits of Rs 475.9 crore, and marketing, distribution and promotional spends of Rs 427.1 crore, underlining the continued investment required to sustain reach and engagement.
At an operating level, margins remained under strain. Operating margin stood at 2.33 per cent for FY26, marginally higher than 1.77 per cent in FY25, while net profit margin remained negative at -13.02 per cent, though improved from -14.89 per cent.
On the balance sheet, total assets rose to Rs 8,957.6 crore as of 31 March 2026, from Rs 8,317.5 crore a year earlier. Equity strengthened to Rs 4,958.7 crore, while borrowings increased to Rs 3,112.8 crore, reflecting a higher reliance on debt to support operations.
Cash flows told a mixed story. While financing activities generated Rs 83.9 crore, operating cash flow remained negative at Rs -24 crore, highlighting ongoing pressure on core cash generation. Cash and cash equivalents, however, improved to Rs 33.9 crore from Rs 1.8 crore.
The numbers point to a company in transition growing revenues, trimming losses, but still grappling with structural cost pressures. In a sector where scale often comes at a price, Network18 seems to be inching towards balance, one quarter at a time.
