Brands
Zomato Q4FY23 results – Growth and profitability dilemma continues
Mumbai: Zomato has reported muted revenue growth of 22.6 per cent YoY in the food business this quarter, as MTU’s decline 4.6 per cent QoQ due to 1) initiative of Zomato Gold and 2) shut down in 225 cities; in terms of GOV, the growth was mere 12.2 per cent YoY (MTU growth of 5.7 per cent YoY), due to inflationary pressure impacting overall delivery revenue.
AOV and delivery charges remain flat, as order volume was more driven by new user acquisition and increased frequency; respite for profitability continues on the back of lower discounts, which had the biggest impact for moving contribution margin 70bp higher QoQ to 5.8 per cent in the food segment. The management maintains their guidance of 4-5 per cent of EBITDA as a percentage of GOV in the food business over medium term, however, there may be pressure on revenue growth rates too, to keep AOV under check and drive higher frequency within the existing customer base, rather than spend more on discounts/new customer acquisition.
We believe food GOV growth rates will come closer towards 15-20 per cent over the near term, whereas food revenue growth rates could be towards 20 per cent-22 per cent driven by better take rates.
We continue to believe that initiativesl like ONDC and direct ordering platforms won’t disrupt Zomato’s business model as unit economics are not favourable for restaurants due to lower AOV and higher delivery costs; however, it may keep take rates stable for most chains, restaurants that have a higher AOV vs average (Rs 400); we may also see a scenario of take rates being linked to AOV, as latter will lead to savings (lower take rates) for restaurants.
Quick commerce segment continues to report robust GOV growth (17 per cent QoQ in Q4FY23) with an improved margin profile, but concerns persist on the same due to low scale potential, as launching the offering in more cities could negatively impact AOV and eventually potential unit economics; reduction in losses is a key monitorable for this segment as concerns in the form of higher competitive intensity and discounts persist.
Zomato is currently trading at 39x FY25 EV/EBITDA (core food delivery segment), after factoring a 18 per cent growth in the food GOV, and 3 per cent EBITDA margin as a percentage of GOV; however, including losses of Blinkit (estimated to be in the range of INR 2.75bn in FY25), valuations for Zomato are high at 52x FY25 EV/EBITDA (consolidated business including quick commerce). The stock has already moved up 30 per cent over the last 3M and is trading at fair valuations, offering limited upside in the near term.
Brands
UK’s OnlyFans seeks US investor at $3bn valuation after owner’s death
The adult video platform is seeking stability after the death of its billionaire owner
LONDON: OnlyFans is looking for a new partner. The London-based adult video platform is in advanced talks to sell a minority stake of less than 20 per cent to Architect Capital, a San Francisco-based investment firm, in a deal that would value the business at more than $3bn (£2.2bn).
The move is driven by an urgent need for stability. Leonid Radvinsky, the Ukrainian-American billionaire who owned OnlyFans, died of cancer last month at the age of 43, leaving the future of one of Britain’s most profitable privately held businesses suddenly uncertain.
The choice of Architect Capital is not arbitrary. The firm has deep expertise in financial services, which aligns neatly with OnlyFans’ ambitions to offer banking products to its creators, many of whom have long struggled to access basic financial services because of the nature of their work.
The numbers behind OnlyFans are, by any measure, staggering. The platform posted revenues of $1.4bn in the year to 30th November 2024, with a pre-tax profit of $684m, up four per cent on the prior year. Payments to creators totalled $7.2bn over the same period, a rise of nearly ten per cent. Radvinsky personally collected $701m in dividends from the business in 2024 alone, on top of more than $1bn in such payments he had already received. The platform, run through its parent company Felix International, hosts 4.6m creator accounts, with performers keeping 80 per cent of subscription proceeds and the platform pocketing the remaining 20 per cent. It has 377m fan accounts in total.
The current minority stake talks represent a notable scaling back of ambitions. In January, OnlyFans was reported to be in discussions with Architect about selling a majority stake of 60 per cent. Before that, the company had explored a sale to a consortium led by Forest Road Company, a Los Angeles-based investment firm. Neither deal materialised.
OnlyFans has built an enormously lucrative business on content that mainstream finance has long refused to touch. Now, with its owner gone and a $3bn valuation on the table, it is looking for the kind of respectable institutional backing that might finally persuade the banks to take its calls.
