MAM
Sunfeast’s ‘Missing Wife’ campaign puts equality back on the nameplate
MUMBAI: When Bengaluru saw posters declaring “Nikhil’s wife is missing…”, passers-by were left puzzled, worried, and curious in equal measure. But the mystery wasn’t a crime scene, it was ITC’s Sunfeast Marie Light turning everyday nameplates into a powerful statement on equality.
The campaign, fittingly titled ‘Missing Wife’, is the latest chapter in the brand’s ongoing push for shared identity in households. Last year, Sunfeast Marie Light launched the Strong Team Nameplate Campaign, spotlighting how many Indian homes still display just one partner’s name at the door. This year, the OOH teasers across Bengaluru bus shelters and hoardings dialled up the intrigue with one-liners like “Nikhil’s wife is missing…” before revealing the emotional message: the absence of a woman’s name on a nameplate may not make headlines, but it quietly reinforces imbalance at home.
Taking the message beyond hoardings, Sunfeast Marie Light partnered with Mygate to extend the initiative into 40 plus residential societies. The campaign struck a chord by contrasting the immediate concern when a loved one goes missing with the near invisibility of a missing name. By putting equality, respect, and shared identity back on the doorstep, the brand once again underlined its belief that a home isn’t complete without both partners standing side by side.
Brands
Jubilant FoodWorks faces Rs 47.5 crore GST demand, plans appeal
Tax authorities flag alleged misclassification of restaurant services
MUMBAI: Jubilant FoodWorks Limited has landed in a tax tussle after receiving a GST demand of Rs 47.5 crore from the office of the additional commissioner of CGST and central excise in Thane, Maharashtra.
The order, issued under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, relates to an alleged incorrect classification of certain services under the category of restaurant services. According to the tax authorities, this classification resulted in a short payment of goods and services tax for the period between the financial years 2019-20 and 2021-22.
The demand includes Rs 47.5 crore in GST along with an equal amount as penalty, in addition to applicable interest. The order was received by the company on March 13, 2026.
In a regulatory filing to the BSE Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, the company said it disagrees with the order and believes its arguments were not adequately considered.
The company is preparing to challenge the decision and plans to file an appeal. It added that once the redressal process is complete, the demand is likely to be dropped.
Despite the sizeable figure attached to the notice, the company said it does not expect any material impact on its financials, operations or other activities.
The disclosure was signed by Suman Hegde, EVP and chief financial officer, who confirmed that the company received the order at 19:06 IST on March 13 and has already initiated steps to contest it.
The development places the quick service restaurant major in the middle of a tax debate that could hinge on how certain restaurant-linked services are classified under GST rules. For now, the company appears ready to take the matter from the tax office to the appeals desk.
