Brands
Lizol tops BARC’s week 21 list of top brands.
Mumbai: The Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) released its report for week 21, and Lizol has topped the list of brands with 573.05 (000 secs) of ad volume. The disinfectant cleaner is followed by streaming giant Amazon Prime Video which claimed the second spot with an ad volume of 526.66 (000 secs), after holding the sixth position in the BARC listing of most advertised brands last week.
Veet Hair Removal System and Dettol Toilet Soaps are at third and fourth spots in the list accounting for 437.03 (000 secs) and 427.56 (000 secs) ad volumes respectively. The top list of brands released by BARC for week 21 is also dominated by personal and home hygiene products, where Dettol Antiseptic Liquid, Harpic Bathroom Cleaner, Dettol Liquid Soap, Dettol Intense Cool Soap, and Harpic were ranked fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth respectively.
Ed-tech platform Byju’s learning app grabbed the 10th spot in the list with 293.99 (000 secs) ad volume.
Reckitt Benckiser India has topped the list of advertisers in week 21 by registering 4929.33 (000 secs) of ad volume, followed by Hindustan Lever Limited (4669.27 secs), Brooke Bond Lipton India Limited (747.88 secs), and ITC (658.22 secs) holding fort at second, third and fourth spots respectively.
Amazon Online India Private Limited grabbed the fifth rank on the BARC list with 620.17 (000 secs) of ad volume. Other advertisers who found a place in the top 10 include Colgate Palmolive India Limited (588.01 secs), Procter and Gamble (505.93 secs), Wipro Limited (468.95 secs), Pepsi Co (452.93 secs), and SmithKline Beecham (421.99 secs).
Brands
Jubilant FoodWorks faces Rs 47.5 crore GST demand, plans appeal
Tax authorities flag alleged misclassification of restaurant services
MUMBAI:Â Jubilant FoodWorks Limited has landed in a tax tussle after receiving a GST demand of Rs 47.5 crore from the office of the additional commissioner of CGST and central excise in Thane, Maharashtra.
The order, issued under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, relates to an alleged incorrect classification of certain services under the category of restaurant services. According to the tax authorities, this classification resulted in a short payment of goods and services tax for the period between the financial years 2019-20 and 2021-22.
The demand includes Rs 47.5 crore in GST along with an equal amount as penalty, in addition to applicable interest. The order was received by the company on March 13, 2026.
In a regulatory filing to the BSE Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, the company said it disagrees with the order and believes its arguments were not adequately considered.
The company is preparing to challenge the decision and plans to file an appeal. It added that once the redressal process is complete, the demand is likely to be dropped.
Despite the sizeable figure attached to the notice, the company said it does not expect any material impact on its financials, operations or other activities.
The disclosure was signed by Suman Hegde, EVP and chief financial officer, who confirmed that the company received the order at 19:06 IST on March 13 and has already initiated steps to contest it.
The development places the quick service restaurant major in the middle of a tax debate that could hinge on how certain restaurant-linked services are classified under GST rules. For now, the company appears ready to take the matter from the tax office to the appeals desk.
