MAM
How do Influencers perceive the ASCI code on Influencer advertising
Mumbai: The 14 June deadline for the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) code on influencer advertising to be implemented is just around the corner, even as we reach out to some of the primary stakeholders- the social media influencers themselves. We share their take on the rules that will govern all their future branded collaborations (and already too), with creative content creators being popular and credible voices of society.
While most agree that the Influencer advertising guidelines released last month has transparency at its core to help customers discriminate between a paid content and an organic post, the underlying concern that emerged was whether the new code proposes to shift the onus (of falling foul of the law) on the content creators more than the brand.
To fully understand the implications of the guidelines on the fledgling Influencer marketing industry, it is only fair that we listen in to the influencer’s side- especially now that the deadline to implement the code looms large.
Indiantelevision.com spoke to some of the leading influencers from disparate genres like Fashion, Tech & Social satire to understand their thoughts on how they perceive the guidelines, whether they have started implementing them, and if they have noticed any changes in their traction or engagement.
Fashion & Beauty content creator Sakshi Sindwani, owner of the Instagram handle @stylemeupwithsakshi with over four lakh followers believes the guidelines will enable content creators to make an informed decision on the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of branded content, and relevance of collaborations. “However, there is a rider in terms of engagement,” she says, “It impacts the numbers. So, content creators and brands will have to go the extra mile to ensure that content is creative and integrated, rather than exclusive. Furthermore, creators will need to identify what makes their audience remain loyal.”
Comedy content creator & popular Social satirist Saloni Gaur @salonayyy aka Naazma Aapi aka ‘pados wali aunty’ and a plethora of other satirical characters, with 5.5 lakhs followers on Instagram says: “A few brands don’t like to put labels like paid promotion on your content, it reduces engagement and people don’t like to consume branded content.”
Known for her biting, humorous take on everyday issues and for calling a spade a spade, Saloni agrees that it makes sense from a consumer point of view as it is important to maintain transparency and authenticity. “While the labels might impact the viewership/ engagement, creators need to believe that at the core of creation lies relevant and organic content. And content is king! Creators hold the power in their hands to make it engaging and entertaining for the audience,” she adds.
According to Tech Blogger Shlok Srivastava aka Techburner, with 4.78 lakh followers on Instagram it is a step in the right direction, however, “the nuances of guidelines are not thought through for different platforms or genres.”
The guidelines define ‘influencers’ as those having access to an audience with the power to affect the purchasing opinion and decisions of the consumers. “Social media is a vast pool with so many creators. Some of them are sceptical about the implementation of these guidelines for the kind of content that they create. For instance, in a space like Tech or Auto, 90 per cent of the products are given by the brands for reviews owing to the credibility that we hold. So, if we label such content as paid or branded, it’ll create confusion amongst the audience and they’ll doubt our authenticity which will destroy the whole purpose of establishing regulations,” says Srivasatava.
Pulp Strategy founder & MD Ambika Sharma says, the reception to the reining in by ASCI has been a mixed bucket. While most Influencers understand that the move is a positive one, they have concerns around the impact it would have.
“We are currently working with over three dozen influencers for different campaigns, the sentiment is mostly positive. There is a lack of awareness and we are building compliance alongside campaign execution,” she says.
IPLIX Media co-founder Neel Gogia states that as with every new initiative a debate is necessary to create a sustainable solution.
“The lines are a little blurred. For instance, a non-monetary association under which an influencer shares an unbiased product review will be labelled as an Ad, leaving consumers in a tough spot. This will be difficult to implement for a tech or an auto influencer as they cannot buy every product for review as they are of high monetary value, and in fact, not all the reviews are positive as well so they cannot be labelled as an Ad,” he says.
Furthermore, Gogia says that the current recommendations might not be aligned with the objective of organic and value-added content creation with genuine product integration. “For a YouTube content creator with long-format vlogs labeling the entire integration section as an Ad will lead the audience to ignore the content even if it is adding value to them”, he adds, saying that we will just have to wait and watch how this unfolds.
In recent times, a significant portion of the marketing budget of brands or businesses is allocated to social media advertising. Influencer marketing has witnessed a surge in India, especially in the pandemic period. Nielsen studies have shown that home-bound consumers during the pandemic have led to a 60 per cent spike in the amount of video content watched globally.
Brands
Wipro hires 7,500 freshers, withholds FY27 hiring outlook
Profit rises to Rs 3,522 crore, Rs 15,000 crore buyback announced.
MUMBAI- Hiring may be on, but visibility is off, Wipro is adding talent even as it pauses the crystal ball. The company hired 7,500 freshers in FY26 but stopped short of offering any hiring outlook for FY27, underscoring the uncertainty gripping the IT services sector as it pivots towards an AI-led operating model.
The disclosure came alongside its fourth-quarter earnings, where management flagged volatile demand conditions and refrained from committing to future workforce expansion. Chief human resources officer Saurabh Govil noted that over 3,000 of the total hires were onboarded in the March quarter alone, signalling continued intake despite a lack of clarity on deployment pipelines.
This divergence active hiring without forward guidance reflects a broader industry pattern where talent acquisition continues even as deal conversions remain uneven and client spending cycles stretch. Wipro expects its IT services revenue for the June quarter to range between a decline of 2 per cent and flat growth sequentially in constant currency terms, reinforcing near-term caution.
Chief executive officer Srini Pallia pointed to artificial intelligence as both a disruptor and an opportunity. He said evolving client priorities are pushing the company towards outcome-driven engagements, with Wipro increasingly focusing on a services-as-software model through its AI Native Business and Platforms unit. The shift marks a structural change from traditional headcount-led growth to AI-enabled delivery frameworks.
The company has already committed over $1 billion to its AI ecosystem, with investors closely watching how these investments translate into revenue. For now, the numbers present a mixed picture. Net profit rose sequentially to Rs 3,522 crore, while revenue grew 3 per cent to Rs 24,236 crore. However, core IT services performance remained under pressure, with full-year revenue declining 0.3 per cent in dollar terms and 1.6 per cent in constant currency.
Large deal bookings offered a counterpoint, rising 45.4 per cent year-on-year to $7.8 billion, highlighting a widening gap between deal wins and actual revenue realisation. On a quarterly basis, IT services revenue slipped 1.2 per cent sequentially, signalling continued softness in execution.
Margins, however, told a more optimistic story. Operating margins expanded to 17.3 per cent in the fourth quarter, up from 14.8 per cent in the previous quarter, reflecting improved cost discipline. That said, the company cautioned that upcoming wage hikes and the ramp-up of large deals could exert pressure going forward.
Attrition stood at 13.8 per cent in the March quarter, indicating stabilisation after periods of elevated churn. Alongside its earnings, Wipro also announced a Rs 15,000 crore share buyback, reinforcing its focus on shareholder returns, with a payout ratio of 88 per cent over the past three years.
Taken together, the numbers capture a company in transition investing in AI, maintaining hiring momentum, but navigating a demand environment where growth is uneven and visibility remains limited.
