Connect with us

MAM

Dish TV, Star India ads pulled up by Asci

Published

on

MUMBAI: Advertising Standards Council of India’s (Asci) Consumer Complaints Council (CCC) upheld complaints made against 27 advertisements during the quarter April – June 2011.

During the same quarter, the CCC also rejected complaints against 15 advertisements as they did not violate the Asci Code.

The CCC did not uphold complaints against 17 advertisements of various advertisers that include MakeMyTrip, Mankind Pharma, P&G WellaKolestint, Dabur India, McNroe Consumer Products, Royal Hygiene, Tata Chemicals, HUL’s Axe Googly Deo, Times of India, amongst others as these advertisements did not contravene Asci’s codes or guidelines.

Advertisement

The complaints were upheld against advertisers from FMCG, education, healthcare, DTH and media sectors.

Dish TV‘s claim to offer “30 True HD channels” was rejected by the CCC citing that the use of the word ‘True‘ to denote “upscaled standard definition” channels as HD was misleading.

Their claim of providing maximum number of HD channels was also challenged, stating that Dish TV can provide only a limited number of HD channels and the other “claimed” HD channels were SD channels upscaled to HD at the DTH end. This claim would lead to consumers expecting an HD experience being misled.

Advertisement

Similarly, complaints against certain claims made by Star India on the AsliHD campaign were upheld by the CCC stating that the claims of AsliHD were framed to exploit consumers‘ lack of knowledge of HD technology.

In the educational sector, a complaint against IMS Learning Resources’ advertisement claiming “8 out of 10 toppers in CBS” and other similar claims was upheld since the claims could not be substantiated with evidence duly validated by an independent agency.

Similarly, complaint against Roots Education‘s advertisement claiming No 1 CAT coaching in Delhi and other claims was upheld due to lack of evidence to back the claim.

Advertisement

The complaint against Career Launcher advertisement claiming 303 Calls in DU (BBS/ BFIA) without mentioning whether they were final admission calls or just interview calls was also upheld by the CCC.

The complaint against Sri Balaji Society’s advertisement claiming 829 students being placed from the 2009-11 batch without mentioning the total number of students was upheld on the ground that the claim contravened Section 4C of Asci’s guidelines for advertising of educational institutions and programmes as the advertisement shows images of colleges which do not seem real.

ITM Institute of Fashion, Design & Technology in their advertisement state that their study programmess are approved by PIFT and MS University, but fail to provide details like full name and location. This contravenes the Asci Guidelines for advertising of educational institutions and programmes, hence the complaint was upheld.

Advertisement

Similarly, ITM Institute of Hotel Management stated that their degree programme was affiliated to Mumbai University but failed to provide a specific institution or college and its location. Also, their claim of being voted Top Hotel Management College of the country by ‘Competition and Success Review‘ was not substantiated. Thus, the complaints against this advertisement were upheld by the CCC.

Advertisement claims by FMCG majors HUL, P&G, Reckitt Benckiser, Paras Pharma amongst others came under the CCC’s scanner.

FMCG major Hindustan Unilever was faced with a complaint regarding their advertisement on a leaflet of ‘Pureit Water Purifier’ which contains numerous disparaging and false statements about the competitor product – Tata Swach. The distribution of anti-Tata Swach danglers on Tata Swach packages by the advertiser was seen as undermining the Tata brand but also an unfair and unethical trade practice. Following the CCC’s intervention and upholding the complaints, HUL withdrew the leaflet from the market.

Advertisement

Another HUL advertisement that came under the scanner was the Axe Effect campaign. This complaint was upheld on the grounds that the visual used was overtly sexual and vulgar and portrayed women in an indecent manner. The complaint against Paras Pharmaceutical’s sexually explicit advertisement of Set Wet Deodorant was upheld on the grounds that it was portraying women as sexual tools.

Some complaints on certain claims made by P&G’s Pantene Pro-V Hair Fall Control were upheld by the CCC on the grounds that the depiction of a stylised golden circular drop misleads consumers into believing that 150 crore and not 15 crore women found Pantene to be effective.

Moreover, P&G’s claim that 80 per cent of Indian women say that the new Pantene is better than anything else they have tried before, based on a study of just 360 women, was misleading. Following the CCC’s decision, P&G removed the stylised golden circular drop in the advertisement.

Advertisement

Similarly, complaints received against Reckitt Benckiser’s advertisement for Dettol Skincare Soap was upheld on the ground that it was misleading consumers by wrongly linking the skin condition to germs, where in reality there is no correlation between the two.

The complaint against Sundrop Heart’s advertisement was upheld on the ground that its statement “jeenekadaarnahi, khaaneka oil badaliye” can lead consumers to believe they can neglect the importance of healthy lifestyle by merely changing the cooking oil they use.

Complaints against an advertisement of International Tractors Ltd for their brand Sonalika Tractors were upheld as they used the creative property ‘Mileage ka Master’ of Mahindra Tractors, thus taking unfair advantage of the goodwill attached to the Mahindra products.

Advertisement

The complaints against GCMMF’s advertisement claiming that Amul butter tops the food triangle, was upheld in the absence of an appropriate disclaimer, ‘to be used in moderation’, which could mislead consumers to believe that Amul Butter is the best food to have, thus leading to over-consumption of butter.

A few healthcare advertisements also came under the CCC’s scanner because of the claims made by the advertisers.
A complaint was received against The Institute of Indian Therapies for their advertisement of ‘AyuCare Lavana Tailam’, which claims that the external application of oil helps reduce the size of one’s stomach and lose all fat. The CCC considered the report of the clinical trial submitted by the advertiser and concluded that the advertisement was misleading.

In another case, AMA Herbal Labs advertisement mentions that competitors use PPD (Paraphenyenediamine) which can be harmful to the hair. The CCC concluded that the specific mention of PPD as a harmful chemical was misleading and unfairly denigrates other products.

Advertisement

Business World magazine claimed to be the No. 1 business magazine in India which was most read and most sold. However, the IRS for the 3rd Quarter of 2010 showed the magazine in third place. Since the claim was not supported by any independent research, the complaint against the advertisement was upheld.

The complaint against JyothyLabs’s Exo Dish Shine Bar advertisement claiming that it can kill disease-causing germs in just 20 seconds was upheld as the technical data submitted did not support the claim that it “starts” killing germs in 20 seconds. The advertiser made appropriate modifications to the advertisement post the CCC’s decision.
The complaints against the Amul Body Warmer advertisement were upheld as the CCC concluded that the depiction of Draupadi in a frivolous manner could hurt religious sentiments of a large section of society, thus causing grave and widespread offence.

The complaints against claims made by Shree Maruti Herbal’s D-Diabetes Smart Powder advertisement were upheld as these were not substantiated with clinical trials and technical data.

Advertisement

Complaints against Micromax Mobile advertisement showing a student experimenting in a chemical laboratory which ends in a blast were upheld as it sends the wrong message to students and that it may encourage many students to emulate an act that could cause injury or harm.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Brands

Wipro hires 7,500 freshers, withholds FY27 hiring outlook

Profit rises to Rs 3,522 crore, Rs 15,000 crore buyback announced.

Published

on

MUMBAI- Hiring may be on, but visibility is off, Wipro is adding talent even as it pauses the crystal ball. The company hired 7,500 freshers in FY26 but stopped short of offering any hiring outlook for FY27, underscoring the uncertainty gripping the IT services sector as it pivots towards an AI-led operating model.

The disclosure came alongside its fourth-quarter earnings, where management flagged volatile demand conditions and refrained from committing to future workforce expansion. Chief human resources officer Saurabh Govil noted that over 3,000 of the total hires were onboarded in the March quarter alone, signalling continued intake despite a lack of clarity on deployment pipelines.

This divergence active hiring without forward guidance reflects a broader industry pattern where talent acquisition continues even as deal conversions remain uneven and client spending cycles stretch. Wipro expects its IT services revenue for the June quarter to range between a decline of 2 per cent and flat growth sequentially in constant currency terms, reinforcing near-term caution.

Advertisement

Chief executive officer Srini Pallia pointed to artificial intelligence as both a disruptor and an opportunity. He said evolving client priorities are pushing the company towards outcome-driven engagements, with Wipro increasingly focusing on a services-as-software model through its AI Native Business and Platforms unit. The shift marks a structural change from traditional headcount-led growth to AI-enabled delivery frameworks.

The company has already committed over $1 billion to its AI ecosystem, with investors closely watching how these investments translate into revenue. For now, the numbers present a mixed picture. Net profit rose sequentially to Rs 3,522 crore, while revenue grew 3 per cent to Rs 24,236 crore. However, core IT services performance remained under pressure, with full-year revenue declining 0.3 per cent in dollar terms and 1.6 per cent in constant currency.

Large deal bookings offered a counterpoint, rising 45.4 per cent year-on-year to $7.8 billion, highlighting a widening gap between deal wins and actual revenue realisation. On a quarterly basis, IT services revenue slipped 1.2 per cent sequentially, signalling continued softness in execution.

Advertisement

Margins, however, told a more optimistic story. Operating margins expanded to 17.3 per cent in the fourth quarter, up from 14.8 per cent in the previous quarter, reflecting improved cost discipline. That said, the company cautioned that upcoming wage hikes and the ramp-up of large deals could exert pressure going forward.

Attrition stood at 13.8 per cent in the March quarter, indicating stabilisation after periods of elevated churn. Alongside its earnings, Wipro also announced a Rs 15,000 crore share buyback, reinforcing its focus on shareholder returns, with a payout ratio of 88 per cent over the past three years.

Taken together, the numbers capture a company in transition investing in AI, maintaining hiring momentum, but navigating a demand environment where growth is uneven and visibility remains limited.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Advertisement News18
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement Whtasapp
Advertisement Year Enders

Indian Television Dot Com Pvt Ltd

Signup for news and special offers!

Copyright © 2026 Indian Television Dot Com PVT LTD

This will close in 10 seconds