MAM
Blink Digital taps Dia Kirpalani and Suraj Karvi to head strategy, media
Mumbai: Independent digital agency Blink Digital has announced the appointment of two vice presidents Dia Kirpalani and Suraj Karvi, both practicing advertising professionals of over fifteen years.
“As we chase bigger ambitions, it is key to ensure the growth of the company along with the best set of talents in-house to keep pace with the evolving industry. Their appointment is another validation of our commitment and leadership in the industry,” said Blink Digital co-founder and chief business officer Rikki Aggarwal, welcoming new appointees on board.
Kirpalani brings experience across finance, market research and advertising, having previously been associated with agencies like WPP, Leo Burnett, Rediffusion. She has worked across myriad industries including FMCG, retail, e-commerce, fashion, skincare, personal health, beauty, real estate, gaming, and financial services, including mutual funds, banking and insurance, across brands like Shoppers Stop, HSBC Bank, Sugarfree, and more.
At Blink, she will oversee the creative strategy vertical for the agency’s current and new clients. “My clear mandate is to bridge the gap between mainline and digital thinking that continues to exist in our industry and to ensure our clients get the benefit of a truly silo-less approach to their business problems. Under Dooj and Rikki’s setup, we have a strategy team that is underpinned by mainline thinking and yet strongly supplemented with digital expertise,” said Kirpalani on her new role.
Karvi was until recently heading the media business for Marico & Atomberg technologies at Madison Media. Prior to Madison Karvi worked with GroupM & Starcom and has experience across industries like FMCG, OTT, Jewellery, Watches, Pharma, Lifestyle Retail, etc. He has also worked in the area of business strategy, planning and sales strategy during his stint with Viacom18 & NDTVMedia.
At Blink Digital, he will be leading the media vertical & be responsible for the current media businesses as well as acquiring new business. “Digital has been the key area of growth within the media marketing world and will continue to be so by creating further excitement & opportunities for brands & industry as a whole. Blink being an independent digital agency house bagging many award-winning works across client categories, my aim will be to add many more to the list. I look forward to working with the team that’s geared up for both business growth & delivering award-winning work hand in hand,” stated Karvi.
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
