Brands
Vikram Solar marks 20 years with heartfelt Diwali film ‘Apno wali Diwali’
MUMBAI: Vikram Solar Limited, one of India’s leading solar PV module manufacturers, ushers in Diwali with a touching new film: Apno Wali Diwali. Celebrating 20 years of illuminating lives, this marks the company’s first-ever festive campaign, inspiring people to reconnect with loved ones and embrace meaningful, sustainable celebrations.
The campaign encourages audiences to rediscover the true spirit of Diwali: one grounded in connection, laughter, and light. Through the story of a man reminiscing about the joy of family gatherings from his childhood, Apno Wali Diwali rekindles nostalgia and reminds viewers that the warmth of togetherness shines brighter than any screen. A simple ring of the doorbell brings back those cherished memories, echoing Vikram Solar’s belief that progress and connection go hand in hand.
“As we complete two decades of powering lives with the Sun’s blessings, Apno Wali Diwali reflects our belief that true progress shines brightest when it brings people closer,” said Vikram Solar chairman and managing director Gyanesh Chaudhary. “Just as solar energy lights up homes, human connections light up lives and this Diwali, we wish to rekindle that warmth.”
Rooted in nostalgia and guided by sustainability, the campaign embodies Vikram Solar’s philosophy of spreading Khushiyon wali sunshine, encouraging celebrations that go beyond lights to touch hearts.
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
