MAM
Mauj launches wallGenie for customised mobile phone wallpapers
MUMBAI: Mauj Telecom has announced the launch of a new Wap-based mobile application called wallGenie, which is one-of-a-kind application that enables people to custom-make and individualise their mobile wallpaper.
There are a range of readymade template wallpapers to choose from, which come with special effects depicting romance, fun, animals, cool spots and greetings.
After choosing the desired template, consumers can also fill in the text box with their own message. The message is then programmatically delivered onto the template image in the effect.
The application can be downloaded through operator portals, like Idea Cellular’s Ideafresh, MTNL’s Funstation, BSNL CellOne Galaxy or by logging onto wap.mauj.com or by SMSing wallGenie to 7007 on Hutch, Orange, Idea, MTNL and BSNL. The application is priced between Rs 9 and Rs 15 depending upon the service.
Mauj COO Arun Gupta said, “This is the age of personalisation. People want their products custom-made. Be it cars, bikes, pocket-watches, every accessory needs to carry the tag of individuality. Personalisation is a big driver in the ringtone category, caller ringback tone and now also in the wallpaper market. Besides, imagery-based mobile content is also becoming very popular. wallGenie is especially created for users who want to design their own personal wallpaper with utmost ease.”
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
