MAM
Ankur Suman partners with PRable Global
Mumbai: Ankur Suman, the esteemed scriptwriter behind the much-anticipated film “Kaagaz 2,” has onboarded PRable Global, a leading PR and communications agency in India, to manage communications for his latest project. “Kaagaz 2” marks veteran actor Satish Kaushik’s final venture and is slated for release on 1 March. The recently unveiled trailer has garnered exceptional acclaim, setting high expectations for the film’s premiere.
PRable Global, known for its dynamic approach and prowess in elevating the presence of startups and founders, views this partnership as a testament to its commitment to diversifying its services. The agency will be strategising and mapping out Suman’s PR-related activities to ensure a much deserved visibility.
Speaking on behalf of PRable Global, founder Aman Singh Madaan remarked, “We are thrilled to welcome Ankur Suman to the PRable Global family. Collaborating with such a talented individual on a project as significant as ‘Kaagaz 2’ is indeed a privilege. Ankur’s trust in our capabilities reinforces our dedication to delivering impactful communication strategies.”
Suman, renowned for his two-decade-long stint in advertising and his innate storytelling prowess, has carved a niche for himself in the realm of scriptwriting. His journey from a seasoned adman to a prolific storyteller has seen him pen scripts for numerous renowned brands including Revital, Relaxo, Suzuki, Valvoline, Nomarks, and IndusInd Bank, among others.
Commenting on his collaboration with PRable Global, Suman expressed his enthusiasm, stating, “Joining forces with PRable Global signifies a significant milestone in my journey with Kaagaz 2 and as a scriptwriter. Their expertise in strategic communication and their track record of amplifying narratives align perfectly with my vision.”
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
