Brands
Boutique Living marks Earth Day with the Natural Earth collection
Mumbai: In celebration of Earth Day, Boutique Living is proud to introduce its latest offering: the Natural Earth Collection. This collection represents a new standard in luxury bedding, showcasing a range of non-sulfur-based, all-organic dyes that are as gentle on the planet as they are on your skin.
The Natural Earth Collection features dyes synthesized from non-edible agricultural and herbal industry waste, such as leaves and nutshells. One of the most striking features of the Natural Earth Collection is its unique aesthetic.
Each hue in the “Natural Earth” collection is carefully crafted with dyes that are fully traceable – from natural waste material to the store. Causing zero threat to the environment, these Organic base fabrics are the future of the earth. The resultant fabrics have an effect that seems like a defect to most, while that is the desired look of natural earth dyes. Natural earth dyes resonate with the concept of organic earth, celebrating imperfect perfection.
Infused with six eclectic shades including White, Medium Cotton, Dark Oak, Dark Forest, and Medium and Dark stone, that are easy on the eye and kind to the planet. Responsibly green and delectably gorgeous, the “Natural Earth” range seems to offer the best of both worlds for eco-conscious buyers!
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
