iWorld
Vuclip and Rajshri Entertainment join hands to go mobile
MUMBAI: Popular on both big screens and TV sets, India’s leading entertainment company, Rajshri Entertainment will be now be available on mobile phones courtesy its new collaboration with the leading premium mobile video on demand service.
This tie-up will enable Vuclip viewers to enjoy family entertainment, including over 50 of Rajshri’s blockbuster full-length films such as ‘Hum Aapke Hain Koun’, ‘Maine Pyar Kiya’, ‘Vivah’, ‘Hum Saath Saath Hain’ as well as hundreds of classic and popular music videos on their phones.
Vuclip COO Arun Parkash said, “Music and movies are deeply ingrained in the Indian way of life. It’s exciting to be able to bring high-quality blockbusters and classics to today’s youth on the platform that they are most engaged on – mobile. With this partnership, Vuclip adds to its expansive library of premium content, including full length movies, for consumers.”
To view premium content from Rajshri Entertainment, consumers can simply go to m.vuclip.com on any device and on any network or download the Vuclip App on Android or Vuclip App on Java.
Rajshri Entertainment, a part of the 67-year old Rajshri group, produces, aggregates and distributes entertainment content across multiple languages and genres to digitally connected audiences worldwide, making entertainment available anywhere, anytime and on any device.
Rajshri Entertainment’s general manager content alliances Inderpal Singh said, “We are delighted to scale up our partnership with Vuclip and make our full length films available to a global mobile audience on the go. We are seeing increasing consumption of long form content on mobile devices and we are confident that our films will delight and entertain an audience on a 3.5 inch screen, just like they did on a 35mm screen!”
This strategic partnership brings popular movies from one of the largest entertainment studios to the go-to mobile video destination for today’s generation.
iWorld
OpenAI hits back at Elon Musk’s lawsuit ahead of trial
Company calls claims “baseless” and accuses Musk of trying to disrupt a rival.
MUMBAI: When the stakes are measured in billions and egos are involved, even Silicon Valley titans can turn a courtroom into a battlefield. OpenAI has issued a sharp public response to Elon Musk’s ongoing lawsuit, accusing the billionaire of filing the case to harass a competitor rather than address genuine concerns. In a strongly worded statement shared on its official X account, OpenAI described Musk’s allegations as “baseless” and suggested the lawsuit is an attempt to disrupt the company as the case heads toward trial later this month in Oakland, California.
The response comes after Musk’s legal team recently amended the complaint, proposing that any damages potentially exceeding $150 billion should go to OpenAI’s nonprofit entity rather than to Musk personally. OpenAI questioned the timing and motive behind this change, calling it a late-stage attempt to “pretend to change his tune” on the nonprofit structure.
The company further labelled the lawsuit a “harassment campaign”, arguing that Musk’s actions are driven by personal rivalry, ego, and a desire for greater control and financial upside.
At the heart of the dispute is Musk’s claim that OpenAI has abandoned its original nonprofit mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity. A co-founder who left in 2018, Musk is seeking governance changes, including the removal of CEO Sam Altman from the nonprofit board, and the return of certain financial gains linked to Altman and President Greg Brockman.
OpenAI has firmly rejected these allegations, maintaining that its current hybrid structure, a public-benefit corporation overseen by a nonprofit parent remains true to its long-term goals. The company has also previously accused Musk of anti-competitive behaviour aimed at weakening its leadership.
As the case prepares for a jury trial, this public exchange highlights the deepening rift between two of the most influential figures in the AI revolution and raises broader questions about governance, mission, and power in the fast-moving world of artificial intelligence.
In the high-stakes game of AI, it seems the real drama isn’t just inside the models, it’s playing out in courtrooms too.
