GECs
Government at a loss on CAS in Mumbai
NEW DELHI: In what may be an embarrassing situation for the central government, CODA (Cable Operator and Distributor Association) spokesperson and Shiv Sena Vibhag Pramukh and spokesperson from Mumbai Anil Parab made it clear at a CAS (conditional access system) implementation committee here today that addressability would not be implemented in Mumbai till “Balasaheb Thackeray gives the permission and certain issues are clarified.”
To top it all, a senior government official admitted after the meeting, “It (CAS) is a non-launch and that the government may have to re-notify Mumbai, setting a fresh date, if CAS is not rolled out in Mumbai within the next few days.”
Addressability, which was supposed to be implemented in the south zones of Kolkata, Mumbai and Chennai from 1 September, was almost a non-starter with only Chennai going in for addressability; while Kolkata and Mumbai deciding not to implement it citing their own reasons. Delhi had already been denotified and taken off the rollout map last week.
Asked whether the pay channels, including those from the Star stable, were off the air or being routed through set-top boxes (STBs), as had been mandated by the Indian government, Star India CEO Peter Mukerjea said, “I am not aware of the situation in Mumbai as I have been in Delhi, but the pay channels have been switched off (in non-STB homes) in Chennai.”
According to multi system operator (MSO) Sumangali Cable Vision GM (operations) Vittal Sampadakumaram, CAS has been implemented in toto in Chennai and they do not expect much trouble there.
However, it is Mumbai, more than Kolkata, that is giving sleepless nights to the central government.
Pointing out that it is life as usual in Mumbai, Parab told journalists after coming out of the CAS meeting here that “nobody would dare switch off pay channels in non-STB homes in Mumbai.”
“Why use Mumbai for this poison test, when it is not being implemented in Delhi?” Parab shot back when asked about the reason for Shiv Sena’s opposition to CAS in Mumbai.
According to Parab, while the government did not say anything officially today on the so-called non-implementation of CAS in Mumbai, Shiv Sena’s stand is that CAS is not consumer friendly, especially in the wake of the fact that there is no uniformity in the implementation scheme with various MSOs and cable operators offering varying schemes.
“If and when the discounted rates (of pay channels) are announced, we’ll see what to do,” Parab said, adding, that they have examined the legality of the issue.
On its part, the government while reiterating that it would be lenient for the first 10 days on CAS, however, said that a senior official would be sent to Mumbai to take stock of the situation.
MUMBAI MSOs STILL OPTIMISTIC
Even as the Shiv Sena factor left its effect on the implementation committee meeting today here in Delhi, various MSOs like Hathway and INCableNet were optimistic that CAS would become a reality in Mumbai too.
INCableNet COO Rajiv Vyas said that his company is prepared to rollout CAS in Mumbai.
Vyas insisted that Shiv Sena was “not adamant” on stalling rollout of CAS in Mumbai, but have raised certain objections, which can be removed and the doubts removed.
According to Hathway CEO K. Jayaraman, unless the cable fraternity was ready to implement CAS in Mumbai, it’d be a slow affair.
Expressing his optimism that issues can be resolved, Jayaraman admitted that his company has seeded very few boxes in Mumbai.
“We have about 450 boxes out in Mumbai, but the boxes can only move when there are clear signals available on the issue,” Jayaraman said, adding that the industry would sit down and make an effort to “resolve the issues” as long as it takes.
So, how would one describe today’s implementation committee meeting attended, amongst others, by even Zee Telefilms CMD Subhash Chandra for some time? “A stalemate,” said Television Eighteen Ltd. MD Raghav Bahl, adding, “Things would move very slowly on this front.”
DELHI CABLE BODY SOUNDS A WARNING
The Delhi-based Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI), meanwhile, today has petitioned the government that cable operators would have no option but to raise the monthly subscription fee in Delhi in the wake of the capital city being taken off the rollout map.
Pointing out that the whole industry is totally “demoralised and has lost faith in the government bringing the situation to a chaotic end”, a memorandum from COFI states, “In such a situation we have no options left, except to demand the rates for all pay channels shown to the consumers, irrespective of their choice, which along with the free to air (FTA) channels’ distribution and the taxes may come to Rs 500 to Rs 650 per month.”
If this is put into reality it would a quantum jump in the fee from the average of Rs 170 per month that a Delhi consume pays his cable operator.
“This is going to be detrimental to the interest of millions of consumers who were, so far, paying a subsidized subscription of Rs 250 to Rs 350 purely due to individual efforts of last mile cable operators, often called by the broadcasters as ‘under declaration’,” the COFI statement said.
To avoid a “chaotic situation and mass scale resentment by the consumers,” it is now suggested that the government should assess the viewership figures of various channels in the four metros through an independent agency and ask the broadcasters to charge the MSOs/LMOs based on those figures so that the operators are not blamed for any under declaration and the broadcasters get their due, while the consumers are not inconvenienced, the COFI statement said.
GECs
Sahara One reports financial results, notes director exit and business realignment
Muted revenues, steady expenses and strategic adjustments shape company’s current phase
MUMBAI: In a tale where the sands seem to be slipping faster than they can be gathered, Sahara One Media and Entertainment Limited has reported another quarter of wafer-thin income and widening losses, even as a boardroom exit adds to the unease.
The company informed the Bombay Stock Exchange that its board, in a meeting held on April 4, approved its unaudited financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. The numbers paint a stark picture. Total income for the quarter stood at just Rs 0.13 lakh, unchanged sequentially and sharply down from Rs 0.26 lakh a year earlier.
Losses, meanwhile, deepened. The company posted a net loss of Rs 24.16 lakh for the quarter, compared to Rs 18.81 lakh in the June quarter and Rs 39.69 lakh in the same period last year. For the six months ended September 2025, the cumulative loss stood at Rs 39.69 lakh, while the full-year loss for FY25 was reported at Rs 60.72 lakh.
Expenses continued to outweigh income by a wide margin. Total expenses for the quarter came in at Rs 24.30 lakh, led by employee benefit costs of Rs 6.51 lakh and other expenses of Rs 17.78 lakh. Earnings per share remained in the red at Rs (0.11) for the quarter.
The balance sheet reflects a company with significant assets on paper but limited operational momentum. Total assets stood at Rs 23,065.57 lakh as of September 30, 2025, broadly unchanged from March 2025. Equity share capital remained steady at Rs 2,152.50 lakh, while total equity was reported at Rs 18,004.85 lakh.
Cash and cash equivalents saw a modest uptick to Rs 6.75 lakh from Rs 4.68 lakh earlier, supported by a positive operating cash flow of Rs 180.01 lakh for the period.
Yet, beneath these numbers lies a more complex narrative. The company’s auditors flagged their inability to obtain sufficient evidence to form a conclusion on the financial statements, citing lack of access to records. They also raised concerns over the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, pointing to insufficient funds, delayed recoveries, and stalled content investments.
Adding to the governance overhang, the company disclosed that Rana Zia has resigned as whole-time director, effective October 16, 2025, citing other professional commitments. The resignation, noted and accepted by the board, also brings an end to her role across company committees.
Regulatory pressures continue to loom large. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has already initiated penal actions for non-compliance with listing norms, with trading in the company’s shares remaining suspended. There is also a risk of promoter demat accounts being frozen.
Legacy legal issues remain unresolved. A substantial deposit of Rs 694,027.88 thousand linked to the long-running OFCD dispute involving Sahara group entities is still under the purview of the Supreme Court of India. Restrictions on asset disposal continue to weigh on the company’s financial flexibility.
Operationally, challenges persist across multiple fronts. Advances worth Rs 1,92,916 thousand given for film content remain stuck, with delays in project completion and uncertain recoverability. The company’s YouTube channel, despite being operational, has generated no revenue for over three years due to compliance lapses. In a further twist, management has indicated that revenues may have been fraudulently diverted through unauthorised changes to its AdSense account, with a police complaint in the works.
There are also missed revenue opportunities. Television content rights continue to be used by a related party despite the expiry of the licence agreement, with fresh negotiations still underway.
For now, Sahara One Media and Entertainment Limited appears caught between legacy disputes and present-day operational hurdles. As losses linger and governance questions mount, the road to recovery looks less like a sprint and more like a slow trudge through shifting sands.
