MAM
What are the Common Myths About the Tax Benefits of NPS?
The National Pension System (NPS) is a retirement savings instrument that offers attractive tax benefits to encourage people to save for their golden years. However, there are many myths surrounding the actual tax benefits you can avail of with NPS. This confuses and stops people from availing of a financially beneficial offering. In this article, we will bust some common myths about the tax perks of investing in NPS. Understanding the realities will help you make an informed decision about using NPS as a tax-saving tool.
Myth 1: NPS Tax Benefits are Just Like Other Investments
NPS offers additional, exclusive tax benefits that most other tax-saving investments do not. Under Section 80C, you can claim a deduction up to ₹1.5 lakhs for NPS contributions, just like other options such as PPF, ELSS, etc. However, NPS offers further deductions:
● Section 80CCD(1B): An extra ₹50,000 deduction, over and above the 80C limit
● Section 80CCD(2): Up to 14% (new regime) is deductible from employer contributions
This is a key difference from other tax-saving investments. Under 80CCD(2), employer NPS contributions up to 14% of basic pay become deductible from taxable salary. No other investment gives salaried individuals this triple tax benefit—80C, 80CCD(1B) and 80CCD(2).
Myth 2: NPS Withdrawals are Fully Taxable
At age 18, the child’s NPS account transitions to a standard NPS account. At exit (typically age 60), up to 60% of the corpus can be withdrawn tax-free as a lump sum, while at least 40% must be used to purchase an annuity, the income from which is taxable. If the corpus is below ₹2.5 lakh, it can be fully withdrawn tax-free.
Compare this to PPF, EPF or VPF, where your accumulations and withdrawals are tax-free only until you retire. Post retirement, interest earnings exceeding ₹50,000 per annum are subject to tax. NPS scores over other retirement schemes here by making 60% of the corpus tax-free irrespective of the holding period or quantum withdrawn.
Myth 3: You Lose Tax Benefits if You Exit Early
This myth stems from partial knowledge. While an early NPS exit does limit the lump sum withdrawal percentage, it does not take back the tax benefits already availed on contributions. For instance, exiting before 60 years only allows withdrawals up to 20% of the corpus instead of 60%. However, all contributions for which you claimed tax deductions will not be added to your income in the year of withdrawal.
The taxman may not ask you to return or nullify deductions enjoyed in previous years. The only impact is that your withdrawals get restricted if you exit before the maturity period of 60 years. So, while early exit impacts liquidity, it does not reverse previously claimed NPS tax benefits.
Myth 4: NPS Benefits Only High-Income Groups
NPS tax benefits are meant for all individuals who pay income tax, irrespective of their salary brackets. For instance, even fixed-income senior citizens can open an NPS account and reduce their tax outgo by ₹50,000 through section 80CCD(1B) deductions.
Similarly, employees across MNCs and SMEs – from blue to white collar roles – can claim NPS tax benefits under 80CCD(2) on employer contributions. The only criterion is that you should have some tax liability to offset through these deductions. So while HNIs may gain more in absolute rupee terms, NPS tax advantages are very much relevant for middle-income groups too.
Myth 5: Lock-in Defeats Flexibility for Tax Planning
NPS indeed comes with longer lock-in requirements than ELSS, PPF, or ULIPs. However, one must evaluate this from a retirement planning perspective. NPS aims to create a pension corpus and hence, places withdrawal limits. However, this does not make it inflexible.
NPS allows partial withdrawals of up to 25% of own contributions before maturity for specific expenses like children’s education/marriage, or buying residential property. You can plan your withdrawals for these crucial life goals. Additionally, you can withdraw the entire corpus if you are diagnosed with any specified critical illness.
So, while NPS discourages random withdrawals, it does account for critical liquidity needs. Partial withdrawals can be used for tax planning while the rest of the corpus remains invested for retirement.
Conclusion
NPS is fundamentally meant for retirement planning, not just tax savings. The lock-in period and withdrawal rules promote disciplined long-term investing. At the same time, exclusive tax benefits make NPS very attractive. Instead of getting swayed by superficial myths, evaluate NPS objectively for its dual advantage – tax efficiency coupled with wealth creation for your golden years. Use it strategically along with other tax-saving options to maximise deductions and secure your financial future.
FAQs
1. Is it good to invest in NPS for tax benefits?
Yes, NPS is great for tax savings. Under Sections 80CCD(1) and 80CCD(1B), you can save up to ₹2 lakh, plus extra deductions for employer contributions under Section 80CCD(2).
2. Is NPS 100% tax-free?
No, NPS is not fully tax-free. After age 60, 60% of your withdrawal is tax-free, but the remaining 40% used for annuity payments is taxed based on your income slab.
3. Can I claim both 80C and 80CCD?
Yes, you can claim both. Section 80CCD(1) is part of the ₹1.5 lakh 80C limit, but Section 80CCD(1B) gives an extra ₹50,000 deduction, and 80CCD(2) covers employer contributions.
4. Can I exit from NPS after 1 year?
Yes, you can exit early, but there are restrictions on how much you can withdraw. Staying longer helps your money grow and keeps your tax benefits intact.
5. What happens to 40% of the NPS amount after death?
If you pass away, your nominee can withdraw the entire NPS corpus, including the 40% annuity portion, as a lump sum, tax-free, or use it to buy an annuity.
Digital
Content India 2026 opens with a copro pitch, a spice evangelist and a £10,000 prize for Indian storytelling
Dish TV and C21Media’s three-day summit puts seven ambitious projects before an international jury, and two walk away with serious development money
MUMBAI: India’s content industry gathered in Mumbai this March for Content India 2026, a three-day summit organised by Dish TV in partnership with C21Media, and it wasted no time making a statement. The event opened with a Copro Pitch that put seven scripted and unscripted television concepts before an international panel of judges, and by the end of it, two projects had walked away with £10,000 each in marketing prize money from C21Media to support development and international promotion.
The jury, comprising Frank Spotnitz, Fiona Campbell, Rashmi Bajpai, Bal Samra and Rachel Glaister, evaluated a shortlist that ranged from a dark Mumbai comedy-drama about mental health (Dirty Minds, created by Sundar Aaron) to a Delhi coming-of-age mystery (Djinn Patrol, by Neha Sharma and Kilian Irwin), a techno-thriller about a teenage gaming prodigy (Kanpur X Satori, by Suchita Bhatia), an investigative crime drama blending mythology and modern thriller (The Age of Kali, by Shivani Bhatija), a documentary on India’s spice heritage (The Masala Quest, hosted by Sarina Kamini), a documentary on competitive gaming (Respawn: India’s Esports Revolution, by George Mangala Thomas and Sangram Mawari), and a reality-horror competition merging gaming and immersive fear (Scary Goose, by Samar Iqbal).
The session was hosted by Mayank Shekhar.
The two winners were Djinn Patrol, backed by Miura Kite, formerly of Participant Media and known for Chinatown and Keep Sweet: Pray & Obey, with Jaya Entertainment, producers of Real Kashmir Football Club, also attached; and The Masala Quest, created and hosted by Sarina Kamini, an Indian-Australian cook, author and self-described “spice evangelist.”
The summit also unveiled the Content India Trends Report, whose findings made for bracing reading. Daoud Jackson, senior analyst at OMDIA, set the tone: “By 2030, online video in India will nearly double the revenue of traditional TV, becoming the main driver of growth.” He noted that in 2025, India produced a quarter of all YouTube videos globally, overtaking the United States, while Indians collectively spend 117 years daily on YouTube and 72 years on Instagram. Traditional subscription TV is declining as free TV and connected TV gain ground, forcing broadcasters to innovate. “AI-generated content is just 2 per cent of engagement,” Jackson added, “highlighting the dominance of high-quality human content. The key for Indian media companies is scaling while monetising effectively from day one.”
Hannah Walsh, principal analyst at Ampere Analysis, added hard numbers to the picture. India produced over 24,000 titles in January 2026 alone, with 19,000 available internationally. The country now accounts for 12 per cent of Asia-Pacific content spend, up from 8 per cent in 2021, outpacing both Japan and China. Key exporters include JioStar, Zee Entertainment, Sony India, Amazon and Netflix, delivering over 7,500 Indian-produced titles abroad each year. The top importing markets are Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt, the United States and the Philippines. Scripted content dominates globally at 88 per cent, with crime dramas and children’s and family titles performing particularly strongly.
Manoj Dobhal, chief executive and executive director of Dish TV India, framed the summit’s ambition squarely. “Stories don’t need translation. They need a platform, discovery, and reach, local or global,” he said. “India produces more movies than any country, our streaming platforms compete globally, and our tech and creators win international awards. Yet fragmentation slows growth. Producers, platforms, and tech move in different lanes. We need shared spaces, collaboration, and an ecosystem where ideas, technology, and people meet. That is why we built Content India.”
The data, the pitches and the prize money all pointed to the same conclusion: India is not waiting for the world to discover its stories. It is building the infrastructure to sell them.
