I&B Ministry
MIB gives nod to RIL’s Viacom18 to transfer TV channel licences to Disney’s Star India
MUMBAI: The creation of a media monolith in India got another tick mark over the weekend.
Oil to telecom to retail giant the Mukesh Ambani-owned Reliance Industries Ltd and its broadcast subsidiary TV18 Broadcast Ltd informed the Bombay stock exchange that the ministry of information & broadcasting (MIB) has given its offshoot Viacom18 Media the go-ahead to transfer its non-news and current affairs TV channel licences to the Walt Disney owned Star India.
The ministry issued the clearance on 27 September, stating that it is subject to complying of conditions laid down by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).
RIL and the mouse house had on 28 February announced that the two giants were “setting up a strategic joint venture to bring together the most compelling and engaging brands in India.”
The transaction had valued the joint venture at Rs 70,352 crore, with RIL pumping Rs 11,500 crore into it.
The two had also agreed to merge Viacom 18 Media’s assets with Star India with the transfer and vesting of the Media Operations Undertaking from Viacom 18 and Jio Cinema into Digital 18, a subsidiary of Viacom 18.
RIL owns a clutch of channels including the Colors and Sports 18 brands through Viacom18 as well as the OTT platform JioCinema whereas Star operates market leader Star Plus, several regional language channels and the OTT service Hotstar.
Under the finalised deal, RIL and its affiliates will hold a 63.16 per cent stake in the newly formed entity, which will manage two streaming services and 120 television channels. The Walt Disney Company will retain the remaining 36.84 per cent stake.
Permissions for the initiative got the CCI green signal, subject to certain conditions, on 28 August, while the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) gave its clearance on 30 August for the two to merge, subject to clearance for the transfer of licences by the MIB.
Post the merger, RIL director Nita Ambani will be appointed as the chair person of the new entity with Uday Shankar being the vice-chairman.
I&B Ministry
India turns up the heat on piracy, orders Telegram to axe 3,142 channels and blocks 800 websites
New legal teeth, nodal officers and notices to intermediaries signal that the government is done playing nice with copyright thieves
NEW DELHI: India’s war on film piracy just got significantly more aggressive. The government has ordered Telegram to remove 3,142 channels distributing pirated content, blocked access to around 800 websites through internet service providers, and put the full weight of freshly sharpened legislation behind the crackdown. The message from New Delhi is unambiguous: the free ride for copyright thieves is over.
Minister of state for information and broadcasting L. Murugan spelled out the legal architecture to the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 2023, he said, now contains specific provisions designed to make piracy a genuinely painful proposition. Sections 6AA and 6AB prohibit unauthorised recording and transmission of films, with violations attracting a minimum of three months’ imprisonment and a fine of Rs 3 lakh. At the upper end, offenders face three years behind bars and fines of up to 5 per cent of a film’s audited gross production cost — a figure that, for a big-budget production, could run into crores.
The legislation also gives the government powers to act against intermediaries hosting infringing content, by notifying them under Section 79(3) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and compelling takedowns and blocking actions. Under Section 79(3)(b), intermediaries are legally required to remove or disable access to unlawful content upon receiving government notice or court orders. The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, add a further layer of obligation, requiring platforms to ensure their services are not used to host or distribute content that violates copyright or proprietary rights.
To put enforcement into practice, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has established a dedicated institutional mechanism, complete with nodal officers to receive complaints. Copyright holders, authorised representatives or individuals can report piracy through a prescribed format, after which the government issues notices to intermediaries to disable access to infringing links.
The most headline-grabbing action came on 11 March 2026, when Telegram was formally notified under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act and directed to remove and disable 3,142 channels found to be distributing unauthorised content belonging to OTT platforms, content owners and producers. The complaints that triggered the action came from OTT platforms including JioCinema and Amazon Prime Video, which alleged that copyrighted films, web series and other material were being shared on the platform on a massive scale. Telegram’s architecture, with its large file-sharing limits and capacity for user anonymity, has made it a favoured vehicle for exactly this kind of large-scale piracy.
The Telegram action sits within a broader pattern of escalating enforcement. Just days before the Lok Sabha statement, the ministry banned five OTT platforms for streaming obscene content: MoodXVIP, Koyal Playpro, Digi Movieplex, Feel and Jugnu. In July 2025, the Centre ordered the blocking of 25 OTT platforms accused of streaming obscene, vulgar or pornographic material, a list that included ALTT, ULLU, Big Shots App, Desiflix, Boomex, Navarasa Lite, Gulab App, Kangan App, Bull App, Jalva App, ShowHit, Wow Entertainment, Look Entertainment, Hitprime, Feneo, ShowX, Sol Talkies, Adda TV, HotX VIP, Hulchul App, MoodX, NeonX VIP, Fugi, Mojflix and Triflicks.
Rule 3(1)(b) of the IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, provides the regulatory hook for those actions, prohibiting platforms from hosting content that is obscene, pornographic, invasive of privacy, gender-harassing, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that promotes hatred and violence.
For an industry that loses billions of rupees annually to piracy, the direction of travel is welcome. The question, as always, is not whether the laws exist, but whether the enforcement machinery can keep pace with the ingenuity of those determined to circumvent it. Three thousand channels down, and the pirates are already busy opening three thousand more.
