MAM
Mindshare named MMA EMEA Mobile Agency of the Year 2015
MUMBAI: WPP’s Mindshare has been named Mobile Agency of the Year 2015 in the MMA EMEA Smarties awards. The award follows hot on the heels of the agency being named Agency Network of the Year in the APAC MMA Smarties and Global Media Agency of the Year in the MMA Global Smarties.
The work that secured the EMEA title includes:
Gold
Brand Awareness: Rexona – Who Does More?
Cross Media / Cross Mobile Integration: Rexona – Who Does More?
Silver
Promotion: Magnum – #celebratemagnum
Mobile Site: Vodafone – Share Your Passion
Bronze
Marketing Within a Mobile Gaming Environment: Vodafone – Freezone Gaming Stars
Mindshare Worldwide global mobile director James Chandler said, “It’s fantastic to see our Mindshare teams receive the recognition that they richly deserve for leading the industry in Europe. Congratulations too to all our clients who have been true partners in pushing the boundaries of mobile.”
In addition to the EMEA title, Mindshare Turkey also picked up four gold, one silver and one bronze award in the local MMA Turkey awards that were announced at the same time:
Gold
Brand Awareness: Rexona – Who Does More?
Cross Media / Cross Mobile Integration: Rexona – Who Does More?
Mobile Social: Vodafone – Between Us Hurriyet Social
Innovation: Rexona – Who Does More
Silver
Mobile Native: Neutrogena – Winter Love
Bronze
Mobile Native: Vodafone – Between Us Hurriyet Social
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
