GECs
Moser Baer entertainment business CEO Harish Dayani : Harish Dayani- Moser Baer entertainment business CEO
Moser Baer is shaking up the home video market with its low pricing. While VCDs are available at Rs 28, DVDs are priced at Rs 34.
Will the market dynamics change as new players like Adlabs hatch plans to enter the business?
In an interview with Indiantelevision.com’s Sibabrata Das and Ashwin Pinto, Moser Baer entertainment business CEO Harish Dayani elaborates on how the home video market will never be the same.
Excerpts:
|
Why did Moser Baer decide to get into the entertainment and home video market? |
|
|
When several home video players like Time have folded up, what made you think that Moser Baer could fix it right? |
|
|
How did you take care of the content? |
|
|
Isn’t regional films a significant component of this? |
|
|
But how do you source top content when the big Bollywood studios like Yash Raj Films have set up their own home video labels? |
|
|
Pricing seems to be an important strategy for Moser Baer. How much volumes do you have to reach to make this a profitable business model? |
|
|
When you start buying big Bollywood movies and have to pay a high content cost, will your operating margins not puncture? |
|
|
How do you align with the international studios as they are already having exclusive distribution deals with the other home video players? |
|
|
How are you sprucing up your distribution network?
Most home video businesses have 20-40 distributors across the country. We have 500. We feel that every town must have a distributor. We do not want to depend on a wholesaler in a large town who will cater to a small town. We tell distributors to give the product to retailers in their area. Entertainment product in this country is available in some 20,000 stores. Our product is available in 100,000 shops and we are just two months old. The aim is to take this to a chain of 300,000. |
|
|
What are the margins you are offering to the distributors? |
|
|
|
|
How crucial is branding as part of Moser Baer’s strategy? |
|
|
Will you have your own stores as part of the branding exercise? |
|
|
How has the deal with Pyramid Saimira helped expand your reach? |
|
|
Are you looking at entering the rental market? |
|
|
How about getting into alliances with broadcasters so that you can acquire wholesome rights? |
|
|
What are the plans on the film production front?
We will also produce movies that we will release for the home video market. This should happen sooner than later. We also plan to get into the film distribution business but at a later stage. |
|
| Are you looking at producing regional language movies? We have signed with Prakash Raj for three films in Tamil and are also looking at other languages. Our eventual aim is to make films in all languages. |
|
|
How much are you pumping in for your entertainment business? |
|
| With low pricing, what growth can we expect in the home video sector? Our estimate is that it would grow at four to five times the current size in three years. We want to have a 50 per cent share of this. |
|
|
Is the home video market dynamics up for total change? |
|
|
You have moved into HD DVD. Won’t the conflict between the two incompatible formats Blu Ray and HD DVD prevent quick uptake of the technology? |
|
|
Does Moser Baer nurture ambitions of eventually becoming a studio? |
GECs
Sahara One reports financial results, notes director exit and business realignment
Muted revenues, steady expenses and strategic adjustments shape company’s current phase
MUMBAI: In a tale where the sands seem to be slipping faster than they can be gathered, Sahara One Media and Entertainment Limited has reported another quarter of wafer-thin income and widening losses, even as a boardroom exit adds to the unease.
The company informed the Bombay Stock Exchange that its board, in a meeting held on April 4, approved its unaudited financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. The numbers paint a stark picture. Total income for the quarter stood at just Rs 0.13 lakh, unchanged sequentially and sharply down from Rs 0.26 lakh a year earlier.
Losses, meanwhile, deepened. The company posted a net loss of Rs 24.16 lakh for the quarter, compared to Rs 18.81 lakh in the June quarter and Rs 39.69 lakh in the same period last year. For the six months ended September 2025, the cumulative loss stood at Rs 39.69 lakh, while the full-year loss for FY25 was reported at Rs 60.72 lakh.
Expenses continued to outweigh income by a wide margin. Total expenses for the quarter came in at Rs 24.30 lakh, led by employee benefit costs of Rs 6.51 lakh and other expenses of Rs 17.78 lakh. Earnings per share remained in the red at Rs (0.11) for the quarter.
The balance sheet reflects a company with significant assets on paper but limited operational momentum. Total assets stood at Rs 23,065.57 lakh as of September 30, 2025, broadly unchanged from March 2025. Equity share capital remained steady at Rs 2,152.50 lakh, while total equity was reported at Rs 18,004.85 lakh.
Cash and cash equivalents saw a modest uptick to Rs 6.75 lakh from Rs 4.68 lakh earlier, supported by a positive operating cash flow of Rs 180.01 lakh for the period.
Yet, beneath these numbers lies a more complex narrative. The company’s auditors flagged their inability to obtain sufficient evidence to form a conclusion on the financial statements, citing lack of access to records. They also raised concerns over the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, pointing to insufficient funds, delayed recoveries, and stalled content investments.
Adding to the governance overhang, the company disclosed that Rana Zia has resigned as whole-time director, effective October 16, 2025, citing other professional commitments. The resignation, noted and accepted by the board, also brings an end to her role across company committees.
Regulatory pressures continue to loom large. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has already initiated penal actions for non-compliance with listing norms, with trading in the company’s shares remaining suspended. There is also a risk of promoter demat accounts being frozen.
Legacy legal issues remain unresolved. A substantial deposit of Rs 694,027.88 thousand linked to the long-running OFCD dispute involving Sahara group entities is still under the purview of the Supreme Court of India. Restrictions on asset disposal continue to weigh on the company’s financial flexibility.
Operationally, challenges persist across multiple fronts. Advances worth Rs 1,92,916 thousand given for film content remain stuck, with delays in project completion and uncertain recoverability. The company’s YouTube channel, despite being operational, has generated no revenue for over three years due to compliance lapses. In a further twist, management has indicated that revenues may have been fraudulently diverted through unauthorised changes to its AdSense account, with a police complaint in the works.
There are also missed revenue opportunities. Television content rights continue to be used by a related party despite the expiry of the licence agreement, with fresh negotiations still underway.
For now, Sahara One Media and Entertainment Limited appears caught between legacy disputes and present-day operational hurdles. As losses linger and governance questions mount, the road to recovery looks less like a sprint and more like a slow trudge through shifting sands.






