GECs
IBF urges Centre to grant ‘infrastructure status’ to broadcasting industry
MUMBAI: In a bid to push the digitisation agenda, the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) today urged the Union Government to grant “Infrastructure Status” to the broadcasting industry, including direct to home (DTH) and cable sectors.
At a pre-Budget consultation meeting, chaired by Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, IBF stressed that the expected investment in STBs (set-top boxes) and optical fibre network alone would be to the tune of Rs 25,000 – 30,000 crore.
“In the present era of convergence, distinction between Telecom, IT and Broadcasting sectors is getting blurred. Telecom is already treated as an ‘infrastructure service.’ Broadcasters and distribution platforms will be aided with better and affordable financing options in the present capital-intensive growth phase if broadcasting sector is accorded infrastructure status. This will also provide a level playing field to the broadcasting sector with telecom and ISP industry,” IBF secretary general Girish Srivastava said at the high level meeting.
The Foundation also urged the Government to reduce customs duty on STBs to five per cent from the present 10 per cent. “The Finance Act, 2013 had increased customs duty on STBs to 10 per cent from earlier five per cent. In order to push digitisation, customs duty on STBs should be reduced to the earlier level of five per cent if not entirely removed,” Srivastava added.
On the direct tax front, IBF urged the Finance Ministry to allow carry forward of losses in case of amalgamation/merger. “Currently all industrial undertakings in manufacturing, software, electricity and telecom sectors are allowed carry forward of losses in case of merger/amalgamation. Media and Entertainment industry should be granted a similar status by amending Section 72(A)(7)(aa) of the Income Tax Act,” IBF said in its presentation.
Another proposal presented by IBF related to tax withholding on transponder charges. Finance Act, 2012 retrospectively included payment of transponder hire and other charges as royalty. However, these are not regarded as royalty under DTAA definition of royalty. IBF requested the Ministry of Finance that the definition of royalty under the Indian Income Tax Act and Treaty (DTAA) be aligned so that the credit of withholding tax is available to the foreign satellite service providers.
GECs
Sahara One reports financial results, notes director exit and business realignment
Muted revenues, steady expenses and strategic adjustments shape company’s current phase
MUMBAI: In a tale where the sands seem to be slipping faster than they can be gathered, Sahara One Media and Entertainment Limited has reported another quarter of wafer-thin income and widening losses, even as a boardroom exit adds to the unease.
The company informed the Bombay Stock Exchange that its board, in a meeting held on April 4, approved its unaudited financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2025. The numbers paint a stark picture. Total income for the quarter stood at just Rs 0.13 lakh, unchanged sequentially and sharply down from Rs 0.26 lakh a year earlier.
Losses, meanwhile, deepened. The company posted a net loss of Rs 24.16 lakh for the quarter, compared to Rs 18.81 lakh in the June quarter and Rs 39.69 lakh in the same period last year. For the six months ended September 2025, the cumulative loss stood at Rs 39.69 lakh, while the full-year loss for FY25 was reported at Rs 60.72 lakh.
Expenses continued to outweigh income by a wide margin. Total expenses for the quarter came in at Rs 24.30 lakh, led by employee benefit costs of Rs 6.51 lakh and other expenses of Rs 17.78 lakh. Earnings per share remained in the red at Rs (0.11) for the quarter.
The balance sheet reflects a company with significant assets on paper but limited operational momentum. Total assets stood at Rs 23,065.57 lakh as of September 30, 2025, broadly unchanged from March 2025. Equity share capital remained steady at Rs 2,152.50 lakh, while total equity was reported at Rs 18,004.85 lakh.
Cash and cash equivalents saw a modest uptick to Rs 6.75 lakh from Rs 4.68 lakh earlier, supported by a positive operating cash flow of Rs 180.01 lakh for the period.
Yet, beneath these numbers lies a more complex narrative. The company’s auditors flagged their inability to obtain sufficient evidence to form a conclusion on the financial statements, citing lack of access to records. They also raised concerns over the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, pointing to insufficient funds, delayed recoveries, and stalled content investments.
Adding to the governance overhang, the company disclosed that Rana Zia has resigned as whole-time director, effective October 16, 2025, citing other professional commitments. The resignation, noted and accepted by the board, also brings an end to her role across company committees.
Regulatory pressures continue to loom large. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has already initiated penal actions for non-compliance with listing norms, with trading in the company’s shares remaining suspended. There is also a risk of promoter demat accounts being frozen.
Legacy legal issues remain unresolved. A substantial deposit of Rs 694,027.88 thousand linked to the long-running OFCD dispute involving Sahara group entities is still under the purview of the Supreme Court of India. Restrictions on asset disposal continue to weigh on the company’s financial flexibility.
Operationally, challenges persist across multiple fronts. Advances worth Rs 1,92,916 thousand given for film content remain stuck, with delays in project completion and uncertain recoverability. The company’s YouTube channel, despite being operational, has generated no revenue for over three years due to compliance lapses. In a further twist, management has indicated that revenues may have been fraudulently diverted through unauthorised changes to its AdSense account, with a police complaint in the works.
There are also missed revenue opportunities. Television content rights continue to be used by a related party despite the expiry of the licence agreement, with fresh negotiations still underway.
For now, Sahara One Media and Entertainment Limited appears caught between legacy disputes and present-day operational hurdles. As losses linger and governance questions mount, the road to recovery looks less like a sprint and more like a slow trudge through shifting sands.
