MAM
Secureye reinforces its position in the security surveillance industry at Business Expo’24
Mumbai – Secureye, a one of the globally recognised companies in the security surveillance industry, experienced remarkable success at Business Expo’24, held at Christ College, New 150 Feet, Ring Road, Munjka, Rajkot Gujarat. The company’s pavilion drew significant attention from trade visitors and buyers, resulting in excellent sales and a high level of interest in its innovative security solutions.
During the expo, Secureye’s pavilion was thronged with trade visitors and buyers who showed great interest in the company’s extensive range of security products. This enthusiastic response translated into outstanding sales figures, highlighting Secureye’s strong position in the market. Additionally, the expo served as a platform for Secureye to generate a substantial number of leads, promising future business opportunities and further solidifying its position as a leader in the industry. Seureye is one of the premium brands of Fortune Marketing.
Reflecting on the tremendous response achieved by Secureye at the expo, Fortune Marketing Pvt. Ltd director Atul Gupta said, “Exhibitions like Business Expo’24 are crucial platforms for us to engage with both corporate and individual clients, offering an invaluable opportunity to showcase our latest offerings. Additionally, these events play a pivotal role in strengthening our dealer network, allowing us to foster stronger relationships within the industry and beyond. Our participation in such expos is a testament to our commitment to staying at the forefront of innovation and ensuring that our clients have access to the best security solutions available.”
Secureye’s successful participation in Business Expo’24 reaffirms its commitment to providing cutting-edge security solutions and its dedication to meeting the evolving needs of its customers and the industry as a whole. Secureye specializes in providing cutting-edge technology in the security and surveillance domain, offering a wide range of products such as CCTV cameras, IP cameras, biometric attendance system, access control system, smart door locks and hotel locks, electromagnetic locks, video door phones, turnstiles & boom barriers, RFID cards & tags, and intrusion alarm system. Each product is designed with a focus on quality, suitability, and reliability, making Secureye a trusted name in the industry.
Secureye’s contribution to the “Make in India” initiative is evident through its products designed to enhance the safety and security of the country. With a centralised Data Centre in India and a manufacturing plant in Noida, the company aligns with the Government of India’s AatmaNirbhar Bharat initiative, aiming to make India safer and stronger.
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
