MAM
Moshi Moshi wins the social media mandate of Godrej Jersey
Mumbai: Godrej Jersey has assigned its social media mandate to Moshi Moshi, one of India’s leading and fastest-growing communication companies.
The mandate was won through a competitive pitch process. The directive includes managing the brand presence on social media to create greater awareness, trust and engagement across all customer and segment profiles through strategic brand campaigns and communication.
Speaking on the appointment of Moshi Moshi, Godrej Jersey assistant general manager of marketing Ajesh Sathyababu said, “We aim to engage consumers and reiterate the message of purity, thickness, and the right blend of nutrition across Godrej Jersey’s product portfolio. To do so, we are glad to partner with Moshi Moshi as they understand the local business climate and correspond with our brand’s values. Through this partnership, we aim to create a space for the cross-pollination of ideas and opportunities for social media collaboration with Moshi Moshi.”
Adding to it, Moshi Moshi co-founder & creative director Ajay Bothra, said, “Moshi Moshi has always aimed at providing a value proposition to generate relevant, long-lasting, and captivating communication to all our clients. We will continue to deliver with the same zeal and commitment to Godrej Jersey as well. We are delighted to have them on board and look forward to stirring the dairy market with some innovative & creative campaigns.”
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
