Brands
Elitecon International appoints former IRS veteran Susanta Kumar Panda as independent director
NEW DELHI: Elitecon International is tightening its governance screws. The BSE-listed FMCG group has appointed Susanta Kumar Panda, a retired Indian Revenue Service officer, as an independent director on its board, signalling a sharper focus on compliance, oversight and boardroom rigour as the company expands at home and abroad.
The move brings nearly four decades of tax and regulatory firepower into the boardroom. Panda previously served as a member of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs and as special secretary to the Government of India. His career spans senior roles across the Enforcement Directorate and the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, giving him deep grounding in indirect taxation, enforcement and compliance frameworks.
Elitecon is betting that such experience will bolster board processes, audit oversight and regulatory compliance — areas under growing investor scrutiny for listed consumer companies with cross-border ambitions.
Vipin Sharma, managing director of Elitecon International, said, “We are pleased to welcome Susanta Kumar Panda to our board as an independent director. His deep understanding of fiscal governance, regulatory compliance and public administration will add significant value to Elitecon’s governance framework and support our long-term growth objectives.”
The appointment adds heft to the company’s push for stronger board independence and governance depth. For a firm operating in a tightly regulated FMCG and tobacco landscape, regulatory literacy is not a luxury but a shield.
Founded in 1987 as Kashiram Jain & Company, Elitecon International is listed on the BSE and runs a diversified FMCG and tobacco portfolio. With more than three decades in manufacturing and trading, it operates across domestic and international markets, backed by scalable production.
As Indian consumer companies grow bigger and more global, the boardroom is becoming as strategic as the marketplace. Elitecon’s latest hire suggests it wants fewer surprises, tighter controls and a steadier hand on the regulatory tiller — because in today’s markets, governance can be as valuable as growth.
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
