MAM
ASCI upheld 99 complaints against 136 advertisements
MUMBAI: In the month of February, Advertising Standard Council of India’s (ASCI) Consumer Complaints Council (CCC) upheld 99 out of 136 advertisements. What is interesting that this time around, along with the product advertisements, product packaging was also found misleading in many of the products upheld in the second month of the year.
In the health and personal care category, the CCC found claims in product or service ads of 80 advertisers, released in the press to be either misleading or false or not adequately/scientifically substantiated and hence, violating ASCI’s Code. Some of the health care products or services ads also contravened provisions of the Drug & Magic Remedies Act. Complaints against some of the ads which were upheld are: Dabur India’s Fem Fairness Natural Bleach claims that ‘everyone’s desire for fairness will be fulfilled’. ‘The saffron in it gives a glowing skin for long time’. Colorbar Eye Believe Ultimate Eye Cream advertisement says that ‘Why women love Ultimate Blemish Corrector? 92% women saw a visible lightening of under-eye circles* Super: *Based on internal consumer study.’
Also, Eureka Labs’ ‘Health Enhancer Capsule claims that it ‘sures digestion process, increases hunger’, ‘develops body and makes it energetic’, ‘makes body fit and healthy’, ‘helpful for increasing height in kids’, ‘patent ayurvedic medicine.’ Marico’s logo “International Hair Research Certified” appearing in the TVC is misleading by implication that the product has been endorsed by some institute, this claim was not substantiated. Also the source & date for the claim is not indicated in the TVC.
In all, complaints were upheld against 80 ads in the category.
The CCC found claims in print ads by five different advertisers were not substantiated violating the ASCI Guidelines for Advertising of Educational Institutions and hence the complaints against the ads were upheld. For instance, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University’s advertisement claims that it is accredited A grade by NAAC (National Assessment and Accreditation Council).
For Food & Beverages category, the CCC concluded that the claims mentioned in the six advertisements were not substantiated. The advertisements contravened ASCI’s Code. The complaints were upheld for Marico’s advertisement of ‘Saffola Total’ claim that it is better than Olive Oil. Saffola Total has started an all-out attack on olive oil. The ad appears even after the recent ban on the adverts of Saffola Total, denigrating olive oil. Similarly, the pamphlet of The Pizza Hub offered a 50 per cent discount only for that day. However, on calling to order, the complainant was told that the offer was only on certain pizzas. This wasn’t mentioned anywhere in the pamphlet, nor was there a generic disclaimer such as ‘terms and conditions’ apply.
Brands
Jubilant FoodWorks faces Rs 47.5 crore GST demand, plans appeal
Tax authorities flag alleged misclassification of restaurant services
MUMBAI: Jubilant FoodWorks Limited has landed in a tax tussle after receiving a GST demand of Rs 47.5 crore from the office of the additional commissioner of CGST and central excise in Thane, Maharashtra.
The order, issued under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, relates to an alleged incorrect classification of certain services under the category of restaurant services. According to the tax authorities, this classification resulted in a short payment of goods and services tax for the period between the financial years 2019-20 and 2021-22.
The demand includes Rs 47.5 crore in GST along with an equal amount as penalty, in addition to applicable interest. The order was received by the company on March 13, 2026.
In a regulatory filing to the BSE Limited and the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, the company said it disagrees with the order and believes its arguments were not adequately considered.
The company is preparing to challenge the decision and plans to file an appeal. It added that once the redressal process is complete, the demand is likely to be dropped.
Despite the sizeable figure attached to the notice, the company said it does not expect any material impact on its financials, operations or other activities.
The disclosure was signed by Suman Hegde, EVP and chief financial officer, who confirmed that the company received the order at 19:06 IST on March 13 and has already initiated steps to contest it.
The development places the quick service restaurant major in the middle of a tax debate that could hinge on how certain restaurant-linked services are classified under GST rules. For now, the company appears ready to take the matter from the tax office to the appeals desk.
