Connect with us

MAM

AdLift wins two awards at CDO Converge

Published

on

MUMBAI: AdLift, a digital marketing agency with offices in the US and India, has been awarded for its digital excellence at the CDO Converge Conference and Awards held in Mumbai.

AdLift and Aakash Institute won the Digital Excellence Award in education. AdLift and ICICI Lombard won the best Content Driven Digital Marketing Campaign.

AdLift CEO Prashant Puri: “The award acknowledges our breadth of experience within the education space with search marketing. We work closely with the BFSI segment. I’m excited that our work within the content marketing realm for ICICI Lombard has been endorsed.”

Advertisement

The announcement follows AdLift’s recent success at Masters of Modern Marketing Awards.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

MAM

How Risk and Return Are Linked in Mutual Funds

Published

on

Risk and return maintain inverse proportionality within mutual funds – higher potential rewards accompany elevated volatility, while stability demands lower expectations. SEBI’s Riskometer (1-5 scale) standardizes visualization, but quantitative metrics reveal nuanced relationships across categories and market cycles.

Fundamental Risk-Return Relationship

Equity funds (Riskometer 4-5) deliver historical 12-16% CAGR alongside 18-25% standard deviation—large-cap 15% volatility, small-cap 30%+. Debt funds (1-2) yield 6-8% with 2-6% volatility. Hybrids (3) average 9-12% returns, 10-14% volatility.

Advertisement

Sharpe ratio measures return per risk unit – equity 0.7-0.9, debt 0.5-0.7 over complete cycles. Higher risk categories compensate through return premium capturing economic growth.

Volatility Metrics Explained

Standard Deviation: Annual NAV return dispersion—equity 18-22%, debt 4-6%. 

Advertisement

Maximum Drawdown: Peak-to-trough losses – equity 50%+ (2008), debt 8-12%. 

Beta: Market sensitivity – equity 0.9-1.1, debt 0.1-0.3.

Sortino Ratio focuses downside volatility—equity 1.0-1.3 favoring recoveries. 

Advertisement

Value at Risk (VaR) estimates 95% confidence, worst 1-month loss: equity 10-15%, debt 1-2%.

Category Risk-Return Profiles

Large-cap equity: 12-14% CAGR, 15% volatility, Sharpe 0.8. 

Advertisement

Mid/small-cap: 15-18%, 22-30% volatility, Sharpe 0.7. 

Corporate bond debt: 7-8%, 4% volatility, Sharpe 0.6.

Liquid funds: 6.5%, <1% volatility—capital preservation. 

Advertisement

Credit risk debt: 8.5%, 6% volatility—yield pickup. 

Hybrids: 10-12%, 12% volatility—balanced exposure.

Review types of mutual funds specifications confirming mandated asset allocations driving profiles.

Advertisement

Historical Risk-Return Tradeoffs (2000-2025)

Complete cycles: Equity 14% CAGR/18% volatility; 60/40 equity/debt 11%/11% volatility; debt 7.5%/5% volatility. Bull phases (2013-2021): equity 18%, debt 8%. Bear markets (2008, 2020): equity -50%/+80% swings, debt -10%/+10%.

Inflation-adjusted: Equity 8% real CAGR; debt 1.5% real—growth funding requires equity allocation.

Advertisement

Risk Capacity Assessment Framework

Short-term goals (1-3 years): Riskometer 1-2 (liquid/debt), 2-4% real returns. Medium-term (5-7 years): Level 3 (hybrid), 4-6% real. Long-term (10+ years): Level 4-5 (equity), 6-9% real.

Personal factors: Age (younger = higher risk), income stability, emergency fund coverage, other assets. Drawdown tolerance—20% comfortable vs 40% discomfort signals capacity limits.

Advertisement

Portfolio Construction Principles

Diversification: 60/40 equity/debt reduces volatility 40% versus equity-only while capturing 80% returns. 

Correlation: Equity/debt 0.3 average enables smoothing.

Advertisement

Rebalancing: Annual drift correction sells outperformers (equity +25%), buys underperformers (debt -5%). 

Style balance: Large-cap stability offsets mid-cap growth volatility.

Quantitative Risk Management Tools

Advertisement

Sharpe Ratio: >1.0 indicates efficient risk-taking. 

Information Ratio: Alpha per tracking error. 

Downside Deviation: Focuses losses only.

Advertisement

Stress Testing: 2008 scenario simulations reveal portfolio behavior extremes.

Conclusion

Higher mutual fund risk levels correlate with elevated return potential – equity 12-16% amid 18-25% volatility versus debt 6-8%/4-6%. Risk capacity matching, category diversification, rebalancing discipline, and quantitative metric interpretation align portfolios with personal tolerance across economic cycles.

Advertisement

Disclaimer: Investments in the securities market are subject to market risk, read all related documents carefully before investing.

Continue Reading

Advertisement News18
Advertisement
Advertisement Whtasapp
Advertisement Year Enders

Indian Television Dot Com Pvt Ltd

Signup for news and special offers!

Copyright © 2026 Indian Television Dot Com PVT LTD