I&B Ministry
MIB, TRAI allay industry fears on sat capacity leasing & content regulations
MACAU: Indian government officials on Tuesday used an international platform of CASBAA Convention 2017 here to allay some of the industry fears on regulatory challenges involving satellite capacity leasing on foreign satellites and possible content regulations, while stating the country strives to be vibrant, living up to PM Modi’s stated policy of ease of doing business.
“The improvement in India’s ease of doing business global ranking to 100 is not just eyewash. It represents real changes,” Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) secretary NK Sinha said here, adding that though general talks with the department of space and Indian space agency ISRO were continuing to ease policy restrictions for Indian customers to lease capacity on foreign satellites, a meeting on some specific issues were yet to take place.
“Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s mantra is perform, reform, transform,” Sinha said stressing on the message that efforts were on to remove bottlenecks to doing business in India’s thriving broadcast and cable sectors and that technology was critical for both communications and content.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) chairman RS Sharma chipped in to state the regulatory body had recommended to the government to adopt an open sky policy. “These (ISRO issues) are not issues of principle, but of operation,” he added.
“The issue also affects broadband provision. To ensure affordable broadband in rural areas, India will need to use satellites to provide this (service),” Sharma elaborated, adding that TRAI was presently studying stakeholders’ comments on its consultation paper on ease of doing business in the broadcast sector “to resolve the matters raised” by the industry.
The two top Indian regulatory officials involved in matters of broadcast and media were responding to a question from the audience on whether they were aware that it was increasingly becoming challenging for Indian customers (like broadcasters, Vsat and teleport operators, for example) to lease capacity on foreign satellites in the wake of a maze of clearances and paperwork sought by ISRO.
It must be clarified here that though TRAI has been repeatedly suggesting an open sky policy related to satellite capacities (both C and KU bands), the nodal ministry governing ISRO was yet to take an official stand on the regulatory body’s recommendations.
In what would — or could — bring smiles on the faces of many in the Indian broadcast and content business, the top MIB official also batted for self-regulation as a way forward, hinting that irresponsible behavior from stakeholders, however, would not be tolerated.
“Happy with (present) self /co-regulation. Future will be self-regulation. The volume of content is going to explode exponentially. It will not be possible to pre-check each bit of data (but) citizens must be responsive and responsible,” Sinha said responding to another audience query on whether the government proposed to bring in a content regulatory body.
At present, both the News Broadcasters Association and Indian Broadcasting Foundation have frameworks for self-regulation governing their member-companies. However, there are many out of the 800+ licensed TV channels that are not members of these industry organisations.
He further pointed out that there needs to be a mechanism to ensure self-regulation comes back on track if it “strays”, though “pre-certification” didn’t look to be the future.
Earlier speaking at a session themed `View From India’ on Tuesday, both Sinha and Sharma gave a snapshot of the Indian broadcast and media industry to a primarily international and Indian audience at the ongoing three-day CASBAA Convention 2017 here. They highlighted that India thrives as the second largest TV market with 183 million TVHH, 900 TV channels, 310 FM radio stations, 60,000 LCOs, 1,500 MSOs, 360 broadcasters, expanding reach of Doordarshan’s FTA DTH service, multiple DTH platforms, one HITS and several IPTV platforms, apart from OTT services.
The chief of TRAI, which regulates the carriage and tariff segments of the broadcast sector and delivery platforms, in his address said the industry had grown at the rate of 15 per cent CAGR for the last five years and is projected to grow a shade less at 14 per cent for the next five years.
While skirting a direct reference to TRAI’s new tariff regime for the broadcast and cable sectors being legally challenged by some industry players and presently being debated in Indian courts, Sharma mentioned the regulatory body had announced a framework that was “fair, transparent and non-discriminatory”.
“Centralised distribution audits will ensure all broadcasters get audit information. This will reduce the burden on distributors and broadcasters,” he highlighted as an example of its regulatory fairness vis-a-vis multiple audits of customers being presently done draining human and financial resources of stakeholders.
Dwelling on the ambitious multi-million Indian rupee national fibre optic network project or Bharat Net, Sharma said it was now a public-private venture not only for broadband, but also for delivering TV services. “Come, analyse and invest in the Indian broadcast sector,” he exhorted the global investment and media community.
ALSO READ:
MIB reverts to earlier norms of seeking nod from ISRO on uplink/downlink of TV channels
MIB secy Sinha, Viacom18 CEO Vats to speak at CASBAA convention in Nov
I&B Ministry
India turns up the heat on piracy, orders Telegram to axe 3,142 channels and blocks 800 websites
New legal teeth, nodal officers and notices to intermediaries signal that the government is done playing nice with copyright thieves
NEW DELHI: India’s war on film piracy just got significantly more aggressive. The government has ordered Telegram to remove 3,142 channels distributing pirated content, blocked access to around 800 websites through internet service providers, and put the full weight of freshly sharpened legislation behind the crackdown. The message from New Delhi is unambiguous: the free ride for copyright thieves is over.
Minister of state for information and broadcasting L. Murugan spelled out the legal architecture to the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The Cinematograph (Amendment) Act, 2023, he said, now contains specific provisions designed to make piracy a genuinely painful proposition. Sections 6AA and 6AB prohibit unauthorised recording and transmission of films, with violations attracting a minimum of three months’ imprisonment and a fine of Rs 3 lakh. At the upper end, offenders face three years behind bars and fines of up to 5 per cent of a film’s audited gross production cost — a figure that, for a big-budget production, could run into crores.
The legislation also gives the government powers to act against intermediaries hosting infringing content, by notifying them under Section 79(3) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and compelling takedowns and blocking actions. Under Section 79(3)(b), intermediaries are legally required to remove or disable access to unlawful content upon receiving government notice or court orders. The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, add a further layer of obligation, requiring platforms to ensure their services are not used to host or distribute content that violates copyright or proprietary rights.
To put enforcement into practice, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has established a dedicated institutional mechanism, complete with nodal officers to receive complaints. Copyright holders, authorised representatives or individuals can report piracy through a prescribed format, after which the government issues notices to intermediaries to disable access to infringing links.
The most headline-grabbing action came on 11 March 2026, when Telegram was formally notified under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act and directed to remove and disable 3,142 channels found to be distributing unauthorised content belonging to OTT platforms, content owners and producers. The complaints that triggered the action came from OTT platforms including JioCinema and Amazon Prime Video, which alleged that copyrighted films, web series and other material were being shared on the platform on a massive scale. Telegram’s architecture, with its large file-sharing limits and capacity for user anonymity, has made it a favoured vehicle for exactly this kind of large-scale piracy.
The Telegram action sits within a broader pattern of escalating enforcement. Just days before the Lok Sabha statement, the ministry banned five OTT platforms for streaming obscene content: MoodXVIP, Koyal Playpro, Digi Movieplex, Feel and Jugnu. In July 2025, the Centre ordered the blocking of 25 OTT platforms accused of streaming obscene, vulgar or pornographic material, a list that included ALTT, ULLU, Big Shots App, Desiflix, Boomex, Navarasa Lite, Gulab App, Kangan App, Bull App, Jalva App, ShowHit, Wow Entertainment, Look Entertainment, Hitprime, Feneo, ShowX, Sol Talkies, Adda TV, HotX VIP, Hulchul App, MoodX, NeonX VIP, Fugi, Mojflix and Triflicks.
Rule 3(1)(b) of the IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, provides the regulatory hook for those actions, prohibiting platforms from hosting content that is obscene, pornographic, invasive of privacy, gender-harassing, racially or ethnically objectionable, or that promotes hatred and violence.
For an industry that loses billions of rupees annually to piracy, the direction of travel is welcome. The question, as always, is not whether the laws exist, but whether the enforcement machinery can keep pace with the ingenuity of those determined to circumvent it. Three thousand channels down, and the pirates are already busy opening three thousand more.
