MAM
‘Beats of Marapani’ pays tribute to India’s furniture artists
Mumbai: With Beats of Marapani, InnoDesigns pays homage to India’s furniture artists with a groovy music track that seamlessly blends carpentry sounds with Onam melodies.
A passion for home furnishings and technology inspired InnoDesigns, and it translates creative ideas into unconventional designs. Every piece that propels them forward in their design journey is created in collaboration with Indian furniture artisans.
InnoDesigns COO and strategy head Neetii said, “As a brand we believe furniture manufacturers are the lifeline of India’s furniture industry, and as a brand it’s an honour for us to celebrate their craftsmanship and contribution.”
InnoDesigns marketing and sales head Himanshu said on the track, “It was time to bring back the focus on our local furniture manufacturers. And what better occasion than Onam to start this conversation in Kerala. This tribute is also about prepping up the consumer in Kochi and Calicut for Onam as we bring in some unbelievable offers for them.”
LeapX’s Henry Moirang said on this, “For us the brief was clear. Bring alive the brand’s belief that the furniture manufacturer is the protagonist here. So we weaved his craftsmanship and the festival of Onam to make a call-to-action that people of Kerala find relevant and worth advancing. Thanks to Himanshu and his team for making us a part of this journey.”
Brands
Maharashtra panel orders Lodha to refund Rs 5 crore to homebuyers
Consumer court flags unfair practices in long-running property dispute case
MUMBAI: In a sharp rebuke to one of India’s biggest real estate players, the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Macrotech Developers to refund nearly Rs 5 crore to a senior citizen couple, Uttam and Anindita Chatterjee. The ruling, delivered on March 13, 2026, calls out the developer for “deficiency in service” and “unfair trade practices”, bringing closure to a dispute that has stretched over a decade.
The case traces back to 2015, when the couple booked a 3-BHK flat at World Towers in Lower Parel for Rs 12.22 crore, with possession promised within a year. What followed was a series of changes that complicated matters. After deciding to exit the project, they were persuaded to shift to a 4-BHK in another development priced at Rs 8 crore, with delivery scheduled for 2018. However, within months, the price was allegedly increased to Rs 10 crore. After demonetisation reshaped the market, similar flats were reportedly being offered at lower prices, but the couple were not given the benefit.
Despite paying over Rs 2.83 crore, the couple neither received possession nor clarity. Instead, in 2018, the developer unilaterally cancelled the booking, retained part of the amount as earnest money, and argued that the buyers were investors rather than consumers. The commission rejected this claim, observing that casual references to “investment” do not take away consumer rights when the purchase intent is residential.
The bench also held that the developer could not penalise buyers for payment delays while failing to meet its own delivery commitments. It noted the lack of formal documentation for revised terms and termed the prolonged retention of funds without delivering a home as exploitative.
As part of its order, the commission directed the developer to refund Rs 2.83 crore paid by the couple, along with interest at 10 per cent per annum, amounting to around Rs 2.12 crore. In addition, Rs 1 lakh has been awarded for mental agony and Rs 50,000 towards litigation costs, taking the total payout to over Rs 5 crore. The developer has been asked to comply within two months.
For now, the ruling serves as a reminder that in real estate, shifting terms and delayed promises can carry a significant cost.
