MAM
Winners, Losers of Corporate Image 2005
Corporations that develop clear messages and clearly communicate their stories to both the internal organizations and the external forces are the real players. The rest are either still discovering who they are or just making stories as they go along or periodically falling flat on their faces.
Who are the real winners and losers of the corporate image in 2005, which corporation had the best identity, which was most famous, hated or most profitable? All these responses depend on where you stand, as a loyal customer, the general public, employee or competitor.
In a study conducted by ABC Namebank International, 5,000 major corporations around the world were surveyed and results were compiled to measure the impact of their image on customers, profitability and overall market positioning. There was also a strong emphasis on their cyber-branding platforms and e-commerce presence.
Most corporations passed the acid test — 54 percent in all — with a B+ ranking. But the real big winners were very few — 3.9 percent — and the losers stood at 42.1 percent.
The big winners had the Right Story with the Right Image; the others had The Right Story but a very poor Image and struggled to make it work. The losers were almost without a Story, with a bunch of ideas thrown together and some randomly picked up image. They were spinning, but going nowhere.
The Story
Corporate image demands a very clear strategy, a mission, a game plan and a story. All that needs to be enunciated in a few simple sentences or a paragraph or two. What is the corporation all about, what does it do, and where it is going and why?
Corporations that develop these clear messages and clearly communicate their stories to both internal organizations and external forces are the real players. The rest are either still discovering who they are, are just making stories as they go along, or are periodically falling flat on their faces.
It is true that most corporations are usually wrapped-up in some big generic business concepts. It is also a very common problem these days that most find themselves in the middle of quicksands, while the markets are moving too fast in too many directions. Still, the issue of clarity and directions must be fixed. The correct messages must be built and the real stories need to be told.
The Image
There is a lot to be said for the right image to fit the right story.
The most common problem is that the image has no relationship whatsoever with the corporate objectives. Still, senior teams regularly send out very confusing messages to internal layers of staff and ask them to band around the existing image and sing along with out having any solid base or substance. This very often makes it a chicken-or-the-egg dilemma.
The issues about image-building also require a deeper understanding and professional guidance. The right image to fit the right story is critical.
Basic Rules
No matter what the corporation does, it must project a sharper personality, something that requires professional and objective assessments — not just randomly picked, trendy ideas.
When it comes to corporate image, corporations must also try to have images of honesty and respectability. Therefore they have no room for false claims or overly silly, wildly humorous image campaigns. Money and business both are serious issues. Customers and shareholders alike want to do business with the sober teams, and not the beer-commercial-happy bunch.
Lastly, whatever the corporate image and brand name identity the corporation adopts, it must be secured under proper trademarking so that it can be built as something unique and not something shared by thousands of others. Cyber-branding is now the backbone of any business. Only good name identities will survive on the search engines.
In Summary
It’s very easy to figure all this out. A quick review of all your corporate communications material and your collateral will clearly tell you what are the several stories that are being projected by your corporation today. A quick search of your own corporate name identity in Google will tell you in seconds where your corporate brand stands in its distinction, visibility and how easy or difficult is it to find on e-commerce.
Once you have all the data, it is also very easy to have a conference call with your senior management on this issue. You will quickly come up with a game plan to fix the problems you have. After all, it is very easy to do.
Remember… the customers are waiting.
Brands
PUMA Q1 profit jumps 19.6 per cent to €51.9m despite 6.3 per cent sales decline
Inventory clean-up and cost controls lift earnings as brand navigates transition year
HERZOGENAURACH: PUMA has kicked off 2026 on a steady note, reporting improved profitability in the first quarter even as sales slipped, signalling early progress in what it calls a transition year.
The German sportswear major posted sales of €1,863.8 million in Q1 2026, down 6.3 per cent on a reported basis. On a currency-adjusted basis, the decline was milder at 1.0 per cent, helped by ongoing inventory clearance efforts.
Profitability, however, told a more upbeat story. Gross profit margin rose 60 basis points to 47.7 per cent, driven by the reversal of inventory reserves, lower freight costs and a favourable channel mix. EBIT climbed 19.6 per cent to €51.9 million, despite €-12.6 million in one-time costs linked to a cost efficiency programme. Adjusted EBIT stood at €64.4 million, up from €61.3 million a year earlier.
Net profit from continuing operations surged to €26.5 million, a sharp jump from €1.1 million in Q1 2025, with earnings per share improving to €0.18. The financial result also improved significantly to €-15.6 million from €-38.5 million, aided by currency tailwinds.
Speaking on the performance, PUMA chief executive officer Arthur Hoeld said, “In the first quarter our athletes won 21 medals at the World Athletics Indoor Championships and set national records at the Berlin Half Marathon. Operationally, we were off to a solid start to our transition year in 2026. We have managed to reduce our inventory levels faster than planned, streamlined our product portfolio and addressed operational inefficiencies.”
Inventory reduction remained a central theme. Inventories fell 8.6 per cent to €1,898.0 million, while working capital dropped 9.7 per cent to €1,879.2 million. Trade receivables declined 20.3 per cent and trade payables were down 26.2 per cent, reflecting lower sales and purchasing volumes.
Regionally, performance was mixed. EMEA sales fell 10.4 per cent on a currency-adjusted basis to €774.5 million, impacted by weak demand and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. The Americas grew 6.1 per cent (currency-adjusted) to €655.6 million, led by a strong 10.5 per cent rise in Latin America, though reported growth was hit by currency fluctuations. Asia Pacific emerged as a bright spot, growing 7.9 per cent to €433.8 million, supported by strong demand in Greater China and Southeast Asia.
By channel, wholesale revenue declined 2.8 per cent (currency-adjusted), while direct-to-consumer sales rose 3.8 per cent to €528.1 million. The DTC share increased to 28.3 per cent from 27.5 per cent last year, reflecting a sharper focus on owned retail and digital channels.
Product-wise, footwear sales dipped 2.3 per cent (currency-adjusted) to €1,089.6 million, though running and training categories showed strong growth. Apparel inched up 0.9 per cent to €546.3 million, aided by football and golf, while accessories remained broadly stable at €227.9 million.
Free cash flow, though still negative at €-201.4 million due to seasonality, improved significantly from €-737.6 million a year ago. Net debt rose to €1,357.6 million, but the company maintained financial flexibility with €1,104.7 million in cash and available credit lines.
Looking ahead, PUMA reaffirmed its full-year outlook. It expects currency-adjusted sales to decline in the low to mid single-digit range, with EBIT projected between €-50 million and €-150 million. Capital expenditure for 2026 is pegged at around €200 million, focused on digital infrastructure and DTC expansion.
PUMA chief executive officer Arthur Hoeld added, “For the remainder of the year, we will continue to focus on improving the quality of our distribution, cost base and cash management. In doing so, we are laying the foundations for future growth.”
With inventory clean-up ahead of schedule and operational efficiencies beginning to show, PUMA appears to be tightening its laces for a stronger run, even as macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties continue to test the track ahead.
