Report on Hindi News Viewership

Trai vs broadcasters: Impact could be larger than expected

The regulator seems to have pitted itself against broadcasters but what will be its final impact?

Mumbai: The TV industry is eagerly awaiting the outcome of the court battle between the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) and TV broadcasters led by the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) on the new tariff order (NTO) 2.0 case that will be heard on 30 November.

The decision taken by the Supreme Court in the final hearing will significantly alter the dynamics of the TV broadcast industry that have been in place for more than a decade. The conflict essentially from Trai’s point of view is the fight for consumer’s choice that is being taken away by broadcasters.

There are 346 pay-TV channels available to consumers, out of which leading broadcasters own and operate 255 pay channels. It’s standard industry practice to offer their pay channels in a bouquet that has a significant discount. This way the broadcasters can cross-subsidise their channels in a way that even a weak channel has an opportunity to get viewership.

There are driver channels whose viewership is self-driven and niche channels that have a small but dedicated viewership. Trai’s contention is that broadcasters are pushing these ‘extra’ channels on to consumers to increase their revenues from advertising which accounts for two-thirds of their overall revenues.

A senior expert in the broadcasting industry remarked that this view of Trai does not consider the complexities of the sector and understand what the broadcast consumer wants. “India is a price-sensitive market – we want everything to be free or at the cheapest but, at the same time, the best-in-class service,” he said requesting anonymity.

There’s always going to be content on TV that the consumer doesn’t want to watch. On linear TV if the consumer wants to watch different content, he/she may switch the channel and watch something else. That’s why it makes sense for the consumer to have the option of multiple channels available.

With the agenda of allowing consumers to pay only for the channels that they want, Trai mandated that broadcasters announce a-la-carte tariffs of their channels. To ensure that broadcasters do not entice consumers into opting for bouquets that are heavily discounted it created provisions in the amendment order to counter the practice. It mandated that a channel must have MRP no greater than Rs 12 to be included in a bouquet. It also prescribed a linkage between the a-la-carte price and bouquet by mandating that the sum of the a-la-carte price of channels in a bouquet will not be more than 1.5 times the bouquet price.

Whatever consequence Trai had intended, the outcome of the NTO 2.0 has been very different. While the case is being fought in the SC, on 15 October broadcasters announced their reference interconnection offers (RIOs) and new channel rates adhering to the regulator’s order. If the consumer chooses to keep the same number of channels, then his/her content costs are likely to go up when the new tariffs come into effect on 1 December. They have listed the MRP price of their popular channels greater than Rs 12 which means that none of these channels will be a part of the broadcaster’s bouquets.

There isn’t enough data to predict the resulting consumer behaviour after the implementation of the amendment order. The only example of a-la-carte implementation is the conditional access system (CAS) in 2007. CAS is a digital mode of transmission of TV channels via set-top-box (STB) and was rolled out in select metros – Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, and Chennai.

“When CAS was implemented on a small population the consumer had opted for about 5-15 pay channels,” said a senior official from a leading cable operator on condition of anonymity.

Note that this was a period when Star India was offering about eight channels versus 76 it is offering today. “Back then you had to offer every channel a-la-carte and Trai had fixed a ceiling price for pay channels at Rs 5,” he added.

NTO 2.0 implementation will have an impact on a much larger scale. There is a huge economic divide between TV viewing audiences in India. As the official from the cable company puts it, “On the one hand, you have a consumer who decides to be economical and only watch FTA channels. We estimate that there are 30-50 million audiences who only watch Doordarshan on DD Free Dish. On the other hand, you have consumers who are ready to pay Rs 2, 000 to get an OTT subscription including Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+ Hotstar, SonyLIV, ZEE5, and Voot and they will have access to all their TV content as well. The rest of the consumers fall in between these two extremes.”

So, what will be the consequence of broadcasters pulling their MRP channels out of the bouquet? “Personally, I have yet to see a car (niche channels) run without an engine (driver channels)” said the cable operator spokesperson. “Till date, driver channels have taken other channels to the same viewership level.”

According to Trai, broadcasters are exploiting the freedom afforded to them by the NTO 2.0 provisions for a-la-carte pricing and have arbitrarily hiked the prices of their channels and that the new tariffs do not reflect consumer demand. The Tamil Nadu Digital Cable TV Operators Association has gone as far as to send a legal notice to Trai demanding that it intervene and ask broadcasters to reduce channel prices. It claimed that the new tariffs may inflate consumer bills by 100-200 per cent.

“The distributed platform operators (DPOs) have begrudged broadcasters who are not only able to launch more channels, but they also get advertisement revenue. This has led to a corporate rivalry where unfortunately Trai has lent an ear to DPOs without understanding what’s best for the consumer and the larger creative ecosystem,” said an expert from the broadcast business.

“The success of over-the-top platforms proves that without an overzealous regulator and fragmented/unruly intermediary, the content creators are able to know the pulse of their audience and cater to their needs and tastes. Additionally, content and carriage are neatly differentiated with transparency and accountability,” he added.

OTT platforms have a mix of blockbuster and long-tail content that they offer to consumers. Most consumers come to OTT platforms to watch their blockbuster content, and some may also enjoy their longtail content. The OTT player can continue making enormous investments in fresh content because of the steady monthly subscription fee that it charges the viewer.

It's clear that the implementation of the NTO 2.0 based on the tariffs announced by leading broadcasters will essentially increase content costs for the consumer. The consumer must either opt for fewer channels to keep TV bills at the same levels or pay a higher cost in subscriptions. Trai has said that it will keep an eye on the industry and ensure that consumer bills do not go up. 

Latest Reads
I&B Minister Anurag Thakur expects Indian M&E sector to double by 2030

Indian media and entertainment sector, which is currently valued at $24 billion is expected to grow to $30 billion by 2024. “I feel with the growth rate we have and I’m sure it’s going to grow more than that. By 2030 we expect it to double and even more,”

Regulators I&B Ministry
5G auctions likely in May

5G spectrum auction in India is expected to be held in May this year subject to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) submitting its final recommendations on various aspects of the sale process by March, said a senior official of the telecom department.

Regulators TRAI
Budget 2022: I&B ministry allocation slashed to Rs 3980.77 crore in FY23

The Union Budget 2022 has earmarked a total sum of Rs 3980.77 crore for the ministry of information and broadcasting in the fiscal year 2022-23. This amounts to a decrease of Rs 90 crore from last year.

Regulators I&B Ministry
I&B ministry lays down guidelines for infrastructure sharing by MSOs

Mumbai: The ministry of information and broadcasting (I&B) has given its go-ahead to the multi-system operators (MSOs) to share infrastructure with other MSOs on a voluntary basis. As per the guidelines released by the ministry, the responsibility for compliance with guidelines and other...

Regulators I&B Ministry
Trai to form committee for smooth rollout of NTO 2.0

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) has decided to form a committee with representation from leading pay TV industry associations to ensure the smooth implementation of the New Regulatory Framework 2020 and identify impediments with counter-measures for the overall growth of the...

Regulators TRAI
Trai asks broadcasters, DPOs to comply with interconnection agreements regulations

Mumbai: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) has asked broadcasters and distributors of TV channels to immediately implement the provisions of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Register of Interconnection Agreements and all such other matters Regulations, 2019. The...

Regulators TRAI
Trai seeks suggestions to enhance ease of doing business in telecom and broadcasting sector

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) has released a consultation paper on “Ease of Doing Business in Telecom and Broadcasting Sector”. The industry stakeholders can send their comments by 5 January 2022, and counter comments can be submitted by 19 January 2022.

Regulators TRAI
Prasar Bharati not closing any Akashvani radio station in India: Anurag Thakur

Mumbai: Prasar Bharati is not closing any Akashvani radio station in India, the minister of information and broadcasting Anurag Thakur told the Parliament on Tuesday. Thakur was responding to concerns regarding the closure of radio stations across different parts of the country that have been in...

Regulators I&B Ministry
Supreme Court to hold final hearing in NTO 2.0 case today

The Supreme Court is all set to hold the final hearing in the NTO 2.0 case on Tuesday. The matter pertains to a bunch of petitions filed against the Bombay high court order regarding the implementation of the New Tariff Order (NTO) 2.0 issued by the telecom regulator.

Regulators Supreme Court