|
One
of the most hotly contested battles being played out
on Indian television screens at the moment is in the
English movie space. It's basically a two-horse race
at the moment, but the battle for supremacy between
Star Movies and HBO is growing fiercer by the day.
Whether it was growing the weekend slot or coming
with innovations on the marketing front, the activity
was taken to the next level in 2004.
Go
BIG over the weekend! That was the mantra the
two channels chanted in 2004. HBO got the ball rolling
in January 2004 with the Big One block. During
each quarter, at least one megahit movie (like Spiderman)
was shown in the block. Star Movies then launched
its own The Big Two from October. This sees
the channel air two big premiere movies back to back
on one weekend every month. The channel was aiming
to blow up an entire weekend.

'Spiderman'
swung the ratings for HBO |
Tam
data for C&S 15+ 6 Metros for 2004 paints an interesting
picture though. As far as channel shares are concerned,
in the weekdays primetime bracket (8:30 pm-11:30 pm)
HBO has a share of 47 per cent. Star Movies' share
is 43 per cent. Over the weekend (Saturday and Sunday)
Star Movies commands a 50 per cent share versus 37
per cent for HBO. This could be attributed to the
fact that though HBO got ahead in terms of branding
big titles on select Saturdays Star Movies was able
to attract audiences on a more consistent basis on
the weekend. On the weekdays the fight is more close.
| Weekday |
Share
% |
Weekend |
Share
% |
| HBO |
47 |
HBO |
37 |
| Star
Movies |
43 |
Star
Movies |
50 |
| ZMZ |
9 |
ZMZ |
11 |
| Hallmark |
1 |
Hallmark |
2 |
In
what could be interpreted as an attempt to correct
the situation on the weekend HBO has upped the ante
this year by announcing its intention to go big on
select Saturday's in 2005 with The Big Saturday.
HBO
had used the 15-44 demographic last year to claim
that it was ahead. Quoting Tam data for the period
September 2003-August 2004 SEC A,B,C 15-44 On Fridays,
Saturdays and Sundays from 9 pm to midnight HBO stated
that it had the highest share of 1.08 per cent, maximum
reach at 62.37 per cent. In addition people spent
48 minutes on HBO each weekend, which was more than
the arch rival Star Movies.
Nonetheless
the channel is looking to build up the weekend further.
It will increase the number of Big Ones from
five in 2004 to around 10 in 2005. HBO South Asia's
country manager Shruti Bajpai stresses, "When
we talk of a Big One it is not just about taking
a title and slapping the moniker on it. Films like
Spiderman are truly big. Our next Big One
is The Lord of the Rings. If you look at the
15-44 category our Big One which had the lowest
rating --- Charlies Angels II --- rated
higher than the biggest rating that Star Movies' Big
Two managed to get."
A
valid point. From this writer's perspective if you
are talking about big in the true sense of the term
then films like The Lord of the Rings, which
is HBO's next Big One, define the term big.
One cannot really compare Star's Bad Santa
and Bad Company to the Peter Jackson offering
in terms of scale. Having said that, the shares show
that it is not just big titles but also variety that
counts. As Star Movies senior VP content and communication
Ajay Vidyasagar says, "The viewer wants a complete
experience. We have done that by providing them with
interesting fare even before The Big Two launched
with stunts like A Date with Julia Roberts.
It is also important for us to be consistent."

'Ice
Age' helped Star Movies enter the charts |
Last
year Star Movies used the C&S 4+ demographic to
score points. Vidyasagar said, "If you look at
Tam data C&S 4+ SEC A,B you will notice that in
2002 we had a 10 per cent lead over HBO in primetime
and all day. In 2003 we extended our primetime lead
to 20 per cent. For 2004 we maintained this position."
When
it came to BIG films though, it was HBO that led from
the front. Comparing the the top five English films
of 2004 (C&S 15+ 6 Metros) that HBO and Star Movies
threw up, it was HBO that had the overwhelming lead.
| HBO
|
TVR |
Star
Movies |
TVR |
| Spiderman |
2.46
|
Ice Age |
1.02 |
| The
Mummy |
1.30
|
Predator |
0.88 |
Stuart
Little 2
|
0.98
|
The
Magnificent Butcher
|
0.80 |
| Cats
& Dogs |
0.91
|
Aces
Go Places |
0.79 |
|
The Mummy Returns |
0.88 |
Jurassic
Park |
0.78 |
What
do the media planners look at? That is the critical
question. The affluent male audience 15+ is the primary
target. First you look at the major Metros SEC A,B;
then you go to the mini metros SEC A. Somewhere in
between the major metros and mini metros SEC A come
women, who for many clients are as important as the
men.
Says
Initiative Media (AVP) Manas Mishra, "They are
present in large numbers. Children are not focused
on by advertisers of English movie channels because
they air a children's film like Lion King once
in a while. Even for a family film like Spiderman
the number of children that will watch it at say 9
pm would be limited by time band constraints."
Themed
blocks gather momentum: One way that movie channels
package product is through themed blocks which are
either weekly or monthly. This grew more intricate
with blocks being introduced over the past couple
of years that went beyond primetime. In a recent interview,
HBO Asia senior VP programming and promotion Quek
Toi Mien had pointed out that HBO had laid special
emphasis on the summer with the block Summer is
HBO.

'Juraasic
Park' continues to bring in monster ratings for
Star Movies |
"The
previous two years we had the Summer Action Marathon.
For this year we grew the summer into a huge seasonal
theme for the channel. We aimed at widening the target
audience through blocks like Sizzling Nights.
Then there was a special programming block for kids."
Star
Movies on its part announced a revamp of its programming
strategy in October which will continue in 2005. Besides
The Big Two which amounts to 24 new blockbusters
in a year, it also brought in new weekly thematic
slots. For instance on Monday Nights it presented
films of one big superstar. Then there is the $100
million hit on Wednesdays. Here you have films like
Shrek and A Beautiful Mind.
HBO's
Mien further claims that over the past few years HBO
had started the initiative of having a theme every
month. An example of that would be the Oscars month
where it had From the Greatest to The Latest.
"Other movie channels then started copying our
formula". HBO has also looked to broaden the
audience base by focussing on slots beyond the primetime
band. A couple of years ago it introduced youth and
women oriented blocks - Generation Me and Time
Out in the afternoon and early evening.
Mishra
though is less than enthused about the thematic concept.
"There is a need for discontinuous change in
the way the English movie channels approach editorial
and viewership. They need to move beyond thematic
blocks which have been going on for the past few years.
To grow ad revenues further they will have to innovate
by doing initiatives that nobody has thought of earlier
and not just blockbusters and themed festivals."
"Innovation
is the name of the game for these two channels in
an increasingly fragmented market. It is important
that they keep coming up with different ways to package
themselves".
An
interesting innovation from Star Movies in 2004 was
the Opening Night concept. This special sees
viewers catch footage from an upcoming high-profile
film like I, Robot before its theatrical release.
One programming initiative that has worked well for
Star Movies over the past couple of years has been
its Hinglish films block. Now every Thursday it showcases
The Colours of India. HBO meanwhile tried its
hand at dubbing. Films like The Mummy were
aired in Hindi. Bajpai added that while there were
no plans to do more of the same in the near future
the channel was open to options.
The
role of original series: While not a ratings driver,
this continues to play a big role in the programming
repertoire of the two channels. It also helps the
channels position themselves as not simply airing
one film after another. This first started in 2003
when to add variety Star aired Taken while
HBO, after quite a while it needs noting, finally
decided to bring in an original series with Sex
And the City. HBO recently launched the third
season of the Sarah Jessica Parker starrer.
HBO
has an advantage here in that it has original content
at its disposal. That has helped boost the channel's
profile. What is interesting is that in an issue of
The Week last year this writer read a piece
which, while having absolutely nothing to do with
television, used the show as a reference point for
the aspirations of the urban woman. One woman said
something to the effect that the only difference between
her and those women was that while they were in New
York she was unfortunately in Delhi. Clearly the show
has done wonders in giving HBO an aspirational bent.
It
must be said though, that HBO has enjoyed more success
with the tongue 'n' cheek comedy series than Star
Movies had with the sci fi show Taken. The
first season of Sex and The City in 2003 got
an overall average rating of 0.22. Taken had
a rating of 0.12.
Star
Movies also aired the terrorism drama The Grid
last year.

Will
the Indian audience take to the avant guarde stylings
of the show? |
In
2004, HBO added to its original series line up by
airing Carnivale, which had elements of magic
and the supernatural. Later this year HBO will take
the original series initiative a step further when
it airs the critically acclaimed series Angels
In America. The challenge though will rest on
marketing the show. The task before HBO will lie in
choosing one or two themes that the series deals with,
whether it is change that cannot be reversed or the
need for tolerance and then building up the campaign
on that.
Marketing
endeavours move to the next level: When competition
is fierce getting the message out to the audience
is crucial. There are two aspects to this. One is
promoting the product. The other is channel branding.
A
good example of product oriented marketing is
what HBO did for Spiderman. It did an integrated
campaign in the first quarter of 2004 to promote the
Big One slot. This covered all media. Online,
a microsite was created. A contest for Spiderman
which was run during the film got 85,000 responses.
The Big One would have driven HBO's marketing
budget by 15-20 per cent.
Star Movies meanwhile did a unique Die Another
Day contest on New Years Eve. This was spread
across Asia. The
winners got to stay the Ice Hotel in Sweden. The channel
states that the move allowed it to get a leg up over
the competition. To get viewers more closely involved
Star Movies also has the SMS A Flick initiative.
That allows viewers to dictate the primetime film
for Wednesday.
HBO
also runs contests for its partner studios. For example
it did a promotion around the third instalment of
The Lord Of the Rings. This according to Bajpai
"makes us partners in the true sense of the term.
Even when we do basic promotions using the print media
we make sure that our message cuts through the clutter."
An
example of channel branding would be Star Movies
getting itself associated with events to create on
ground awareness. One of these was the first International
Women's Film Festival (IWWF) in India in March 2004.
HBO
meanwhile, tried new tactics to create product awareness.
To push the second season of Sex and The City
it unleashed a promotional campaign which included
a book promotion around Candace Bushnell's book Sex
And The City and special Sex And The City
theme parties. An important promotional activity that
both channels have been doing over the past couple
of years to push the channel brands is advertising
heavily in English cinema halls. The logic is that
the upwardly mobile person who watches English films
on television like this writer will also frequent
the theatres. That will continue in 2005.
The
ad sales scene:
Mishra as well as other media planners spoken to agreed
with data available that in 2004 both the channels
made around Rs 450 million. The total ad revenue for
English channels would be around Rs 1 billion.
In
terms of providing value, the media planners put both
of them on the same level when it comes to return
on investment. It is a fact though that HBO has been
able to stay competitive despite the network it is
in not being as strong as the one Star Movies is on.
While Star Movies like HBO is also sold independently,
it can also use Star Plus as leverage from time to
time to make advertisers consider its case if they
have not done so already.
Information
available with Indiantelevision.com indicates that
Star Movies' rates for primetime spots are higher
than HBO by approximately 15 per cent. Therefore it
is to HBO's credit that it has been able to match
Star Movies' performance.
Appointment
viewing grouse: One issue that media planners
who put money on English movie channels have is the
fact that appointment viewing is not happening. Viewing
according to them happens on a time and convenience
parameter. They however, concede that appointment
viewing does happen to a degree on a weekend when
the big titles air.
Mishra
says, "Even when Star Movies and HBO do their
Oscar band to cash in on the awards season the surge
in viewership is slight. The number of people really
interested who want what is still small. Therefore
we put more money on a blockbuster as opposed to thematic
blocks. If you do a comparison the thing is that Hindi
movie channels have more blockbusters at their disposal."
Starcom
senior account director Melwyn Gonsalves points out
that four years ago it was a novelty for viewers to
get on to a English movie channel. Now there are more
options. Also repeats are happening more frequently.
So appointment viewing is absent. It is a fact that
four years ago when a high profile movie premiered
it was only repeated after two weeks or sometimes
after a month. That is not the case today.
Offering
a counter argument, Vidyasagar says that repeats build
volume. "Even if I air Jurassic Park today
for the hundredth time I will get ratings. It is all
about building buzz for a high profile product. We
did just that when we premiered Die Another Day
back to back on New Years Eve. I also don't agree
that advertisers only target big titles.
"As
far as themes are concerned when we get an advertiser
to brand say a romance block he is sinking money not
just into the big titles that are there but also into
the theme." Bajpai meanwhile, states that the
HBO Reminder Me service has received an encouraging
response.
Vidyasagar
further argues that the family is being targeted.
"In a break you will see an ad for plasma TVs
and another for dog food." Gonsalves however,
maintains that an advertiser who wants to target the
affluent urban audience on a daily basis would more
likely go to a news channel. "He knows that the
news genre is something that people watch everyday."
Tam
data indicates that ad revenues for English movie
channels grew by over 50 per cent in 2004. However,
as had been mentioned earlier, the two channels will
have to come up with further innovations that nobody
else has thought of earlier to sustain growth.
There
is some good news for the English movie channels though.
The planners opined that even with lifestyle channels
coming in, the share of viewership for English movie
channels will not be impacted. In fact National Geographic
and Discovery are more likely to lose share this year,
is the common view.
The
distribution scenario: HBO returned to the Zee-Turner
bouquet from 1 January, 2005 after three year's on
the SET-Discovery One alliance platform. Zee is no
doubt looking at HBO as being a channel driver for
its second bouquet that includes Pogo. Therefore industry
sources indicate that it was willing to pay a higher
Minimum Guarantee (MG). Sony, meanwhile, bought MGM
last year. So shelling out so much would not have
made sense.
Information
available with indiantelevision.com indicates that
Zee-Turner paid an MG of $80 million for a five-year
ad sales and distribution deal, up from $50 million
it got from Sony.
Bajpai
claims that HBO is available in 26 million homes.
As
far as Star Movies is concerned Vidyasagar says it
reaches in excess of 30 million homes. "Star
Movies was the first pay channel launched in India.
Over the years we have developed a special relationship
with the cable fraternity".
Both
channels are strong drivers in the South which could
be the reason why Zee Turner has not yet signed a
deal with Asianet for HBO. If it is such a high value
proposition then Turner can certainly act tough in
terms of subscriber declarations.
Across
Asia, HBO has emerged as the preferred channel for
cable ops. When it came to best value for money 23
per cent of the 41 cable ops surveyed chose HBO. 13
per cent went with Star Movies. The data is contained
in a survey which was conducted by Television Asia
from March 2003 to May 2003.
A
new entrant: Coming back to the Indian situation
Sony needs to act soon to plug the gap left by HBO.
Indications are that it will launch an English movie
channel any time in the next quarter. The pinch is
already being felt in that Sony-Discovery bouquet's
rate had to be revised downwards to Rs 49.40 in 2005
as the price of HBO was Rs 5.60 per subscriber a month.

ZMZ is looking to 'The Aviator'
to shore up the ratings |
A
permissible seven per cent hike only puts the bouquet
rate at Rs 52.85. Apart from MGM led titles what other
offerings Sony's channel will offer remains to be
seen. Of course Sony Pictures has an output deal with
HBO.
While
on the subject of distribution one channel that
is looking to step things up in this front is Zee
Movie Zone. ZMZ business head Ajay Trigunayat
recently conceded, "While our channel is being
watched a lot of networks don't carry us. When they
do we are not on the right band. So that is something
that the distribution team is sorting out.
Technically
we are available in 18 million homes. Unfortunately
we are being hampered by the lack of clarity in terms
of reception. We are also weak in some of the key
regions across the country."
ZMZ
keeping the faith: Trigunayat goes on to state
that the channel has acquired several high profile
releases. "One of them is The Aviator.
It will release into theatres on 19 February. We will
air it towards the end of the year. Over the past
couple of months we acquired around 40 high profile
films from Miramax and other companies. We also acquired
another 200 titles which are repeats that we are confident
will do well as well as smaller films."
Dwelling
on ZMZ as a value proposition Gonsalves says, "I
would consider it only once I've satisfied my basic
media objectives through reach based channels. The
role of the channel would be as a salience generator
for the brand, through innovations & high frequency".
Conclusion:
One thing is for sure. With a new entrant (Sony) coming
into the market in the coming months things will get
more competitive. As Vidyasagar says, "You can
no longer afford to just sit back and rest on your
past accomplishments. Our business is all about staying
ahead of the curve."
This
spells good news for the movie buff as each channel
will go out of its way to make sure that it has the
biggest and best titles. Also with more channels coming
in the ad pie is going to get fragmented further.
So it is not going to be easy to maintain a high level
of growth.
|