|
CNN's
chief Chris Cramer's speech at Ficci Frames 2003 has
really put "reality TV in India under perspective!
Taking about reality TV, Cramer said that this new
broadcasting phenomenon, which has touched all lives
in recent years and has gained popularity in the US
and in Europe, is drowning the rest of the people
in broadcasting.
Cramer
called it a "distraction" which took audiences
minds off important things in life. However, he congratulated
Indians who have somehow managed to remain beyond
most of the "Big Brothers", "Bachelors"
and "Survivors" and more power to Indians
for that! Are Indian networks still wary of reality
TV shows and "soaps" which have scaled peaks
of pop?
In
India, the reality television scene has been making
waves due to individual efforts of players such as
AXN. AXN derived tremendous mileage from bringing
Mike Whitney down last year to host a series of
Who Dares Wins India Specials.
 |
| AXN's
Rohit Bhandari (extreme right) with the winners
of the India leg of Who Dares Win |
Whitney
sure created quite a stir during his India visit and
attracted hordes of youngsters and young-at-hearts"!
Spotting a market in this niche area Zee also launched
the its Reality TV channel on 1 February.
But
what about the latest breed of "reality merging
with fiction" kind of programmes which can be
shown on general entertainment channels? What is the
reaction of Indian programming executives to the success
of programmes such as Joe Millionaire, Bachelor,
Bachelorette in the west? Will such a tightly
structured reality show (in formula and execution)
which typically sets its participants into a narrative
mostly plotted out before the tape ever rolls, ever
succeed in India?
AXN
India's vice president, sales and marketing Rohit
Bhandari says: "There has been no real history
to prove that shows like Bachelor, Bachelorette,
Joe Millionaire would not work in India. The popularity
of these shows will depend a lot on the kind of marketing
that goes behind it and the way the show is built
up. Though one would get this feeling as to why should
an Indian bother about what is happening with someone
in America. But as long as the viewers are made aware
about the show and the show is entertaining and provides
viewers with what they are looking for, there is no
real reason why these shows should not do well."
However,
in India very few are thinking about such shows after
the debacle of the Madhuri Dixit show in 2002. A Sony
Entertainment Television (SET) India spokesperson
says: "The important thing is that programmes
work in a context and an environment. Dating is not
part of the Indian cultural milieu and is not a concept
that television-viewing families would relate to."
Abroad,
the recent successes have resulted in optimism and
new plans have been formulated. Sky's Reality channel
'Sky One Real' will be launched early this summer,
states a Digital Spy report. The network holds the
rights to many home-grown series such as the ...Uncovered
strand and imported series such as Temptation Island
and Boot Camp, all of which could make
appearances in the new channel's schedule.
The
UK's first dedicated reality channel, 'Reality TV',
made its debut in October last year. The station immediately
reported ratings as high as 70,000, a respectable
figure for a minority digital channel. It has already
made a presence in India on the Zee-Turner platform.
Of course there are still distribution issues that
need to be sorted out first, before any talk of ratings
can even begin for the India venture.
 |
| Survivor
Amazon contestant Joanna Ward |
Since
CBS's Survivor rushed to the top of the Nielsen
ratings three years ago, network executives have known
that reality shows can be enormously popular, stated
a New York Times report in the beginning of
the year.
American
Idol on the Fox network, led the way, drawing
25 million viewers two nights running and becoming
the most-watched non-sports shows in the network's
history.
 |
| Bachelorette
Trista Rhen |
The
success of shows like American Idol, The Bachelorette
on ABC and Joe Millionaire on Fox was so impressive
that numerous executives told the Times they
were now ready to embrace plans for a radical restructuring
of the network business, which previously had been talked
about only as dimly possible, long-term adjustments.
A
New York Times op-ed article by Catherine Orenstein
says that the most recent crop of reality television
shows taps the fantasies we first learned from fairy
tales: castles and fortunes, true love and romantic
destiny, and above all that most perfect storybook
union, the ''fairy tale wedding.''
 |
| Bachelor
Andrew Firestone |
Not
only will reality shows continue to flood network's
schedules next fall, but television executives were
also predicting such developments as an end to the
traditional television season. Instead of the time-honored
formula of introducing shows en masse in September
and ending them in May, broadcast networks want to
stagger the shows' debuts and banish repeats from
the schedule almost entirely, the Times had
reported.
In
the US, however, a new poll indicates that the viewer
is starting to tire of Big Brother and Survivor.
Though TV ratings paint a different story, the InsiderAdvantage
survey of 1,000 adults conducted between 28 February
and 4 March indicates that America's affection for
the reality TV genre may be coming to an end. The
poll has a margin of error of plus or minus three
per cent.
When asked: "Are you becoming tired of so-called reality
television programmes?" 67 per cent of respondents
said "yes," 22 per cent said "no," and 11 per cent
did not know or did not answer. Thirty-two per cent
of respondents in the 18-to-29 year age group said
they were not tiring of reality TV, the highest positive
percentage. However, even among this youngest segment,
63 per cent said they were becoming tired of the genre.
And all other demographic segments indicated a strong
future trend away from such programming, according
to the survey.
However,
this does not mean that the ratings will be poor for
the reality television shows which will air in the
US in the near future. It will probably be several
months before the public really starts to rebel against
the reality concept. And even then, if the alternatives
are other reality programmes or the ultimate reality
- war coverage - viewers may well continue to keep
these programmes hot.
 |
| The
desirable "Joe Millionaire" - Evan Marriott
|
InsiderAdvantage chairman and syndicated columnist
Matt Towery has been quoted as saying that cable programmers
would do well to keep in mind the term 'becoming'.
Just like the Who Wants to be a Millionaire
craze had to end, this second phase of reality television
may be heading for the home stretch by the end of
the year. In India, of course, Star Plus will most
likely not renew the Indian version of the show Kaun
Banega Crorepati. However, the success of Channel
[V] Popstars and the girl band Viva it spawned
has already inspired the network to plan the launch
of similar shows in 2003.
"However,
reality shows and studio based game shows could be
revised in concept to meet the cultural requirements.
The reality show concepts will work if they belong
to the Indian ethos and are executed keeping in mind
the sentiments and beliefs of the people. Anything
that offends the sensibilities will not go down well
with the viewers," says a SET India spokesperson.
So
will the future see reality shows with a touch of
soap-element in terms of tight scripts, twists and
turns? Reality merging with fiction to ensure viewer
interest?
"That
sounds like a definition for docu-dramas which have
worked extremely well for our channel. We have had
Bhanwar and Missing - two shows that
have combined reality with fiction and successfully
recreated scenarios that have appealed to the viewers,"
says the SET spokesperson.
AXN's
Rohit Bhandari adds: "Reality with a touch of
the soap element, is already happening, though the
content is packaged heavily around being a reality
show. For example the Amazing Race on AXN is
one such example as it is not just a reality show
with people racing around the globe but it also has
some elements of a
drama building up in the form of inter personal relationships
between team mates and teams."
"There are twists and turns that keep developing
as the show progresses and there are instances where
a team that is leading in one episode, might just
lose their way and could probably get knocked out
in the next episode and vice versa. Instances like
this bring out a lot of drama and emotion within the
show and make for interesting viewing," says
Bhandari.
Western
media analysts claim that the perverse charm of Joe
Millionaire is that it's so upfront with viewers
about its dishonesty -- which makes it among the most
honest of the reality-TV genre. Will Indian TV programming
executives have the nerve to showcase such "real"
dishonesty?
Also read
'Get real' to
succeed, is the new mantra for niche channels
Click
here for more special reports
|