Tête-à-tête with film marketing and distribution consultant Shonjoy Bhattacharjii
 

"Indian audiences want to step out of their homes"

Posted on 16 July 2003
 

A man who is passionate about the business of film making and its marketing and distribution - as much as film makers are about films. Born in a "film family" and having worked with some of the top names in the Indian film industry, Shonjoy Bhattacharjii is a man "who knows the industry inside out." Nearly six months back, he had predicted that the film industry will give the television industry a run for its money and his predictions are coming true.

To add to this, Bhattacharjii's knowledge of the advertising film making business makes him a savvy marketer. After a stint in advertising with Far Productions (renowned ad film maker Kailash Surendranath), Bhattacharjii joined UTV in 1992. He handled the entire gamut - right from ad films to documentaries to TV serials. The next decade was full of "lights, camera and action" as his intensity and dedication went beyond the "just doing a job mentality".

In 1995, Bhattacharjii donned the mantle of heading the newly created films division - UTV Motion Pictures. He was involved in distribution of films, co production of domestic and foreign content. At present, he is now handling consultancy work independently for several top film producers, distributors and advertisers. While talking to Ashwin Kotian, Bhattacharjii talks about film marketing; studies the impact of recent spate of hit films on the television business and gives a sneak preview of things to come in the entertainment business. Excerpts:

 

Is the Indian film industry witnessing an upswing after a dismal 2002? Will this revival prove to be a threat to the television industry at least in the metros?
The recent spate of hit films - Andaz, Bhoot, Jism, Chalte Chalte - proves that audiences are returning to the theatres. This trend is more prominent in the big cities. The market share of cinema as a medium has shot up due to improved infrastructure in the existing theatres and advent of multiplexes.

More importantly, each of the above mentioned films belong to a different genre. People want new and different things or experiences.

Meanwhile, TV production has become as planned and methodical as ad film production - in terms of look, feel, characterisation, environment. Therefore, a certain amount of standardisation is bound to happen, but the 'smart audiences' will sense it and move away if they don't fancy it.

Indian audiences want to step out of their homes. Again, the learning is that good content always invites eyeballs irrespective of the medium. The point remains that consumers enjoy visiting multiplexes as it has become an in-thing - a great ambience with the restaurants, the multiple screens, entertainment options and shopping malls. The future looks bright with block buster movies such as Koi Mil Gaya, LOC, Lakhsya waiting on the sidelines.

 

What has contributed to this recent spate of hits in the Indian film industry?
The greatest change and opportunity in the Indian market is the vast improvement in the exhibition sector. Many corporates or entertainment chains - Adlabs, Shringar, Inox, Zee to name a few - have heavily invested in multiplexes in the last few years.

The benefits will manifest themselves in the next two or three years with 80-90 complexes containing 300 screens plus are up and running along with the existing stand alone theatres. This will create the kind of demand that hasn't been witnessed before - even for content. At present, film makers have been releasing around 300 prints. And in the future there will be more prints released.

More importantly, some of the above mentioned groups are venturing into 'B' and 'C' markets where they have plans to put digital projector screens. A DVD is anytime cheaper than the prints that cost anything between Rs 50,000 to Rs 75,000. Normally, film makers/distributors release their films in 'B' and 'C' class towns later due to a limited number of prints developed. In the near future, they can release DVDs of their films in the smaller towns and have a simultaneous all India release.

 
"With the number of prints increasing phenomenally and the ticket yield going up, a good Indian film has the potential to recover its monies in the first month itself - sometimes, even in the first week itself"
 

How has the distributor-producer relation changed?
The avenues for film makers have increased manifold. Sometime, in the near future, there won't be any problems linked to minimum guarantees as film makers will be able to leverage the multiple options. They can forge alliances with the corporates that have entered the exhibition sector directly rather than going through the distributor and exhibitor route.

There won't be any complaints linked to improper revenue declarations - a problem similar to that of broadcasters and cable operators in the television industry. Film makers will have so much clout that they will be able to bargain and negotiate the minimum guarantees with the various constituents of the distributor chain. This will result in mutually acceptable agreements.

With the number of prints increasing phenomenally and the ticket yield going up, a good Indian film has the potential to recover its monies in the first month itself - sometimes, even in the first week itself. Recent trends have shown that the business in the metropolitan cities have contributed immensely (up to 70 per cent) - in fact resulting in overflows. Several states in India have realised the potential of the entertainment industry and have offered sops. Well, although, all the demands of the film industry haven't been met, some concessions and tax breaks have been offered - especially the benefits to multiplexes and the theatre maintenance sops.

Some of the proprietary film makers are also changing the way in which they have been conducting business have distributed films all over the country through their own offices. Several distributors and exhibitors are getting into production and forging a two-way alliance. In the near future, one should see the emergence of five to seven big players and the smaller players will be affiliated to the giants.

 

How can the Indian film industry become a major player in global stakes?
Indian films need to take the proper entry route coupled with marketing and publicity. The marketing and advertising effort must be on the scale if not greater than what the bigger production houses such as 20th Century, Miramax amongst others do with their offerings in India.

Global audiences have to be made aware and briefed about the innate Indianness of films. In order to do this, one needs proper infrastructure in foreign markets. A hype has to created in those markets - easier said than done. One has to go beyond the ethnic Indian audience in foreign markets and tap westerners and Asians.

There have been cases in the past wherein a Hindi film has been in the Top 10 lists in the first week and totally disappeared from the theatres in foreign markets. A successful crossover film should transcend language barriers and must be a hit in all parts of the globe. Good cinema works in all markets and language is not a barrier in the west because the audiences there are familiar with sub-titled content.

There is a lot of potential to increase revenues with the average cost of the tickets between $5 and $8. In addition to that, we have the DVD market and 300 cable and terrestrial networks across the globe which has not yet been exploited. Over the years, one will see an increase in the number of prints released in the overseas - as compared to the sub-200 mark in terms of prints.

 
"In a way, during these times, when critics have been carping about poor quality of scripts, the Indian film industry has gone back to literature - Devdas, Bajirao Mastani, Saheb Biwi aur Ghulam, Taj Mahal (to name a few) remakes are the order of the day"
 

Will the TV and film industry benefit post CAS?
Post conditional access system, there will be lots of opportunities for marketing content on the C&S channels as well as the terrestrial channels.

Both film and non film based content will be the need of the hour. But the Indian industry must invest in quality original content. There is so much depth in Indian culture, literature and mythology - it hasn't been fully explored. Consider the universal appeal of visual interpretations of the writings of Ravindranath Tagore, Bankim Chandra or Munshi Premchand. In a way, during these times, when critics have been carping about poor quality of scripts, the Indian film industry has gone back to literature - Devdas, Bajirao Mastani, Saheb Biwi aur Ghulam, Taj Mahal (to name a few) remakes are the order of the day. We have turned a full circle and deriving strength from our roots. Post CAS, the Indian television industry must derive inspiration from Indian literature.

Indian media and entertainment companies will have opportunities to either create immensely appealing original content or source it through the BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) model. There will also be opportunities to give an economical option to foreign film makers where they can shoot in India using an Indian crew.

 

Will producers be open to having worldwide premieres on TV?
Having worldwide premieres on the small screen depends on how fast the television/cable industry can garner a critical mass of pay TV subscribers. This will ensure that a film maker has an alternate revenue model option available.

More importantly, broadcasters are actually buying the rights of a film during the conceptualisation stage. In fact, satellite rights cover contribute approximately 20 per cent of the production costs. However, everything will depend on how the pricing is fixed, the subscriber base and negotiations.

 

Should producers appoint marketing consultants right from the scripting stage itself?
It is important for film makers to appoint marketing consultants and agents. The producer needs a mechanism in place at the scripting stage itself so that a plethora of options can be sourced and crystallised before shooting commences. Currently, the marketing - in film placements or tie ups - are being done in a very ad hoc manner. Most of them are being finalised after the film is completed. However, one has to understand the huge potential and opportunity of such alliances - be it in collaborative advertising or communication.

A film maker can actually save money by allowing corporates to bear the burden of publicity. Therefore, the tie ups cannot be stand alone agreements. The synergies have to be identified and considered while finalising the deal. Advertisers will have to quantify and qualify the mileage that the brand gets. Once, they are happy with the deliverables, they have to commit revenues right from the scripting stage. The producers have to directly get involved as the deals have to be struck at the corporate headquarter level.

 
"The onus is on the various constituents of the film and TV industry to be more transparent, produce great content ideas, communicate the uncertainty of the business"
 

How can film producers and TV content producers get funding from VCs and corporate financers?
Funding films and TV content through proper corporate channels is now gaining momentum - especially with the recent entry of some corporates into content funding. This has been a blessing in disguise for film makers who aspire to experiment, innovate and try out new formulae.

There have been instances of venture capitalists, FIIs funding those links in the distribution chain that have made an effort to be more transparent, or more professional. The onus is on the various constituents of the film and TV industry to be more transparent, produce great content ideas, communicate the uncertainty of the business.

Here again, the transparency in the exhibition centres will ensure that the data related to ticket collections will be more accurate than ever before. This transparent accurate database can be made available for reference.

 

How can piracy be tackled?
Piracy cannot be tackled by law and order only - technology can play a significant role. Normally, pirates get an opportunity when film makers phase the release of the film in different markets.

With digital prints, a film maker can release a film simultaneously in all the markets in the country. At least, they can get the first mover advantage that can curb the menace of piracy. Piracy can never be curbed after the release - it has to be tackled much before. I feel that the nine month gap for releases of films is viable.

If there are worldwide premieres on television one week/fortnight after the theatre launch, I suppose the menace of showing new films on cable channels will also be curbed to a certain extent. MSOs and cable operators will definitely have to sign deals with producers in the post CAS scenario and explore options of making money and sharing some with the producers.

 

Do you watch television?
I watch programmes such as Kyunki…, Kahin Kissi Roz, CID and movie channels. I feel that channels must make an effort to develop more film-based programming content. There is an opportunity there. I am passionate about cricket and watch all the 'Big Ticket' matches.

 

 
 
Click for more MAM interviews
 

Email this page Print This Page Home
 
 
 

Contact Us | Feedback | About Indiantelevision | Disclaimer
© 2001- 2005 Indian Television Dot Com Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.