|
|
|
| Tête-à-tête
with film marketing and distribution consultant Shonjoy Bhattacharjii
|
| |
|
"Indian audiences
want to step out of their homes"
|
 |
|
| Posted
on 16 July 2003 |
| |
|
A
man who is passionate about the business of film making and its
marketing and distribution - as much as film makers are about films.
Born in a "film family" and having worked with some of
the top names in the Indian film industry, Shonjoy Bhattacharjii
is a man "who knows the industry inside out." Nearly six
months back, he had predicted that the film industry will give the
television industry a run for its money and his predictions are
coming true.
To
add to this, Bhattacharjii's knowledge of the advertising film making
business makes him a savvy marketer. After a stint in advertising
with Far Productions (renowned ad film maker Kailash Surendranath),
Bhattacharjii joined UTV in 1992. He handled the entire gamut -
right from ad films to documentaries to TV serials. The next decade
was full of "lights, camera and action" as his intensity
and dedication went beyond the "just doing a job mentality".
In
1995, Bhattacharjii donned the mantle of heading the newly created
films division - UTV Motion Pictures. He was involved in distribution
of films, co production of domestic and foreign content. At present,
he is now handling consultancy work independently for several top
film producers, distributors and advertisers. While talking to Ashwin
Kotian,
Bhattacharjii talks about film marketing; studies the impact of
recent spate of hit films on the television business and gives a
sneak preview of things to come in the entertainment business. Excerpts:
|
| |
|
Is
the Indian film industry witnessing an upswing after a dismal 2002?
Will this revival prove to be a threat to the television industry
at least in the metros?
The recent spate of hit films - Andaz, Bhoot, Jism, Chalte Chalte
- proves that audiences are returning to the theatres. This trend
is more prominent in the big cities. The market share of cinema
as a medium has shot up due to improved infrastructure in the existing
theatres and advent of multiplexes.
More
importantly, each of the above mentioned films belong to a different
genre. People
want new and different things or experiences.
Meanwhile,
TV production has become as planned and methodical as ad film production
- in terms of look, feel, characterisation, environment. Therefore,
a certain amount of standardisation is bound to happen, but the
'smart audiences' will sense it and move away if they don't fancy
it.
Indian
audiences want to step out of their homes. Again, the learning is
that good content always invites eyeballs irrespective of the medium.
The point remains that consumers enjoy visiting multiplexes as it
has become an in-thing - a great ambience with the restaurants,
the multiple screens, entertainment options and shopping malls.
The future looks bright with block buster movies such as Koi
Mil Gaya, LOC, Lakhsya waiting on the sidelines.
|
| |
|
What
has contributed to this recent spate of hits in the Indian film
industry?
The greatest change and opportunity in the Indian market is the
vast improvement in the exhibition sector. Many corporates or entertainment
chains - Adlabs, Shringar, Inox, Zee to name a few - have heavily
invested in multiplexes in the last few years.
The
benefits will manifest themselves in the next two or three years
with 80-90 complexes containing 300 screens plus are up and running
along with the existing stand alone theatres. This will create the
kind of demand that hasn't been witnessed before - even for content.
At present, film makers have been releasing around 300 prints. And
in the future there will be more prints released.
More
importantly, some of the above mentioned groups are venturing into
'B' and 'C' markets where they have plans to put digital projector
screens. A DVD is anytime cheaper than the prints that cost anything
between Rs 50,000 to Rs 75,000. Normally, film makers/distributors
release their films in 'B' and 'C' class towns later due to a limited
number of prints developed. In the near future, they can release
DVDs of their films in the smaller towns and have a simultaneous
all India release.
|
| |
| "With
the number of prints increasing phenomenally and the ticket
yield going up, a good Indian film has the potential to recover
its monies in the first month itself - sometimes, even in the
first week itself" |
|
| |
|
How
has the distributor-producer relation changed?
The avenues for film makers have increased manifold. Sometime, in
the near future, there won't be any problems linked to minimum guarantees
as film makers will be able to leverage the multiple options. They
can forge alliances with the corporates that have entered the exhibition
sector directly rather than going through the distributor and exhibitor
route.
There
won't be any complaints linked to improper revenue declarations
- a problem similar to that of broadcasters and cable operators
in the television industry. Film makers will have so much clout
that they will be able to bargain and negotiate the minimum guarantees
with the various constituents of the distributor chain. This will
result in mutually acceptable agreements.
With
the number of prints increasing phenomenally and the ticket yield
going up, a good Indian film has the potential to recover its monies
in the first month itself - sometimes, even in the first week itself.
Recent trends have shown that the business in the metropolitan cities
have contributed immensely (up to 70 per cent) - in fact resulting
in overflows. Several states in India have realised the potential
of the entertainment industry and have offered sops. Well, although,
all the demands of the film industry haven't been met, some concessions
and tax breaks have been offered - especially the benefits to multiplexes
and the theatre maintenance sops.
Some
of the proprietary film makers are also changing the way in which
they have been conducting business have distributed films all over
the country through their own offices. Several distributors and
exhibitors are getting into production and forging a two-way alliance.
In the near future, one should see the emergence of five to seven
big players and the smaller players will be affiliated to the giants.
|
| |
|
How
can the Indian film industry become a major player in global stakes?
Indian films need to take the proper entry route coupled with marketing
and publicity. The marketing and advertising effort must be on the
scale if not greater than what the bigger production houses such
as 20th Century, Miramax amongst others do with their offerings
in India.
Global
audiences have to be made aware and briefed about the innate Indianness
of films. In order to do this, one needs proper infrastructure in
foreign markets. A hype has to created in those markets - easier
said than done. One has to go beyond the ethnic Indian audience
in foreign markets and tap westerners and Asians.
There
have been cases in the past wherein a Hindi film has been in the
Top 10 lists in the first week and totally disappeared from the
theatres in foreign markets. A successful crossover film should
transcend language barriers and must be a hit in all parts of the
globe. Good cinema works in all markets and language is not a barrier
in the west because the audiences there are familiar with sub-titled
content.
There
is a lot of potential to increase revenues with the average cost
of the tickets between $5 and $8. In addition to that, we have the
DVD market and 300 cable and terrestrial networks across the globe
which has not yet been exploited. Over the years, one will see an
increase in the number of prints released in the overseas - as compared
to the sub-200 mark in terms of prints.
|
| |
| "In
a way, during these times, when critics have been carping about
poor quality of scripts, the Indian film industry has gone back
to literature - Devdas, Bajirao Mastani, Saheb Biwi aur Ghulam,
Taj Mahal (to name a few) remakes are the order of the day" |
|
| |
|
Will
the TV and film industry benefit post CAS?
Post conditional access system, there will be lots of opportunities
for marketing content on the C&S channels as well as the terrestrial
channels.
Both
film and non film based content will be the need of the hour. But
the Indian industry must invest in quality original content. There
is so much depth in Indian culture, literature and mythology - it
hasn't been fully explored. Consider the universal appeal of visual
interpretations of the writings of Ravindranath Tagore, Bankim Chandra
or Munshi Premchand. In a way, during these times, when critics
have been carping about poor quality of scripts, the Indian film
industry has gone back to literature - Devdas, Bajirao Mastani,
Saheb Biwi aur Ghulam, Taj Mahal (to name a few) remakes are
the order of the day. We have turned a full circle and deriving
strength from our roots. Post CAS, the Indian television industry
must derive inspiration from Indian literature.
Indian
media and entertainment companies will have opportunities to either
create immensely appealing original content or source it through
the BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) model. There will also be
opportunities to give an economical option to foreign film makers
where they can shoot in India using an Indian crew.
|
| |
|
Will
producers be open to having worldwide premieres on TV?
Having worldwide premieres on the small screen depends on how fast
the television/cable industry can garner a critical mass of pay
TV subscribers. This will ensure that a film maker has an alternate
revenue model option available.
More
importantly, broadcasters are actually buying the rights of a film
during the conceptualisation stage. In fact, satellite rights cover
contribute approximately 20 per cent of the production costs. However,
everything will depend on how the pricing is fixed, the subscriber
base and negotiations.
|
| |
|
Should
producers appoint marketing consultants right from the scripting
stage itself?
It is important for film makers to appoint marketing consultants
and agents. The producer needs a mechanism in place at the scripting
stage itself so that a plethora of options can be sourced and crystallised
before shooting commences. Currently, the marketing - in film placements
or tie ups - are being done in a very ad hoc manner. Most of them
are being finalised after the film is completed. However, one has
to understand the huge potential and opportunity of such alliances
- be it in collaborative advertising or communication.
A film
maker can actually save money by allowing corporates to bear the
burden of publicity. Therefore, the tie ups cannot be stand alone
agreements. The synergies have to be identified and considered while
finalising the deal. Advertisers will have to quantify and qualify
the mileage that the brand gets. Once, they are happy with the deliverables,
they have to commit revenues right from the scripting stage. The
producers have to directly get involved as the deals have to be
struck at the corporate headquarter level.
|
| |
| "The
onus is on the various constituents of the film and TV industry
to be more transparent, produce great content ideas, communicate
the uncertainty of the business" |
|
| |
|
How
can film producers and TV content producers get funding from VCs
and corporate financers?
Funding films and TV content through proper corporate channels is
now gaining momentum - especially with the recent entry of some
corporates into content funding. This has been a blessing in disguise
for film makers who aspire to experiment, innovate and try out new
formulae.
There
have been instances of venture capitalists, FIIs funding those links
in the distribution chain that have made an effort to be more transparent,
or more professional. The onus is on the various constituents of
the film and TV industry to be more transparent, produce great content
ideas, communicate the uncertainty of the business.
Here
again, the transparency in the exhibition centres will ensure that
the data related to ticket collections will be more accurate than
ever before. This transparent accurate database can be made available
for reference.
|
| |
|
How
can piracy be tackled?
Piracy cannot be tackled by law and order only - technology can
play a significant role. Normally, pirates get an opportunity when
film makers phase the release of the film in different markets.
With
digital prints, a film maker can release a film simultaneously in
all the markets in the country. At least, they can get the first
mover advantage that can curb the menace of piracy. Piracy can never
be curbed after the release - it has to be tackled much before.
I feel that the nine month gap for releases of films is viable.
If
there are worldwide premieres on television one week/fortnight after
the theatre launch, I suppose the menace of showing new films on
cable channels will also be curbed to a certain extent. MSOs and
cable operators will definitely have to sign deals with producers
in the post CAS scenario and explore options of making money and
sharing some with the producers.
|
| |
|
Do
you watch television?
I watch programmes such as Kyunki
, Kahin Kissi Roz, CID
and movie channels. I feel that channels must make an effort to
develop more film-based programming content. There is an opportunity
there. I am passionate about cricket and watch all the 'Big Ticket'
matches.
|
| |
| |
| Click
for more MAM interviews |
| |
|
|
|
|
|