IBS TO LOBBY AGAINST DD PROTECTIONISM
The Indian Broadcasting Society (IBS) plans
to petition the government on a proposed move to amend the
Cable TV Regulation Act (CATV) through an ordinance.
It is also preparing a paper for the government
on the fruitlessness of effecting price controls on pay
channels.
The upset private broadcasters feel that the
government's proposal insisting on cable operators carrying
three Doordarshan channels on the prime band and then keeping
two adjoining frequencies free may just push some of the
satellite channels out of the viewable frequencies on a
majority of Indian television sets which are very old and
can tune in to only about 12-16 channels.
Discovery India's country head Kiran Karnik
admitted that the IBS plans to take up the issue with the
Indian information and broadcasting (I&B) ministry as such
a move will create unnecessary problems for the private
cable and satellite industry.
"If the government amends the CATV Act making
it mandatory for cable operators to carry three DD channels
on prime band and for technical reasons also insists on
keeping the adjoining two channels vacant, then out of about
10 channels which can be put on prime band on an average
TV set, five would have already gone, leaving space for
very little other."
A Delhi-based chief executive of another satellite
channel, on condition of anonymity, said the IBS is not
against DD channels being put on prime band, but the government's
insistence that three channels and an additional two frequencies
lie vacant will "rob viewers of choice." The newly-appointed
acting chief executive of Prasar Bharati and also additional
secretary in the I&B ministry, R.R. Shah, in an interview
had recently said that Prasar Bharati plans to recommend
to the government to amend the CATV Act through an ordinance
making it mandatory for DD channels to be carried on prime
band by operators keeping in mind the Pakistani propaganda
being unleashed due to Kargil.
The IBS also plans to take up with the government
the issue of controlling the subscription prices of encrypted
channels.
The Union Cabinet had sometime back okayed
a proposal to amend the CATV Act to include government control
over the subscription rate of pay channels taking a sympathetic
view of the fact that cable operators allege arm-twisting
by pay channel operators.
"How and why should government have a control
over subscription rates of pay channels. It does not exercise
such control over pricing of newspapers," an office-bearer
of IBS said.
The IBS is attempting to point out that by
going the route of price controls the government will indirectly
encourage free-to-air channels which are difficult to monitor
as compared to pay channels which are more easily monitored
because of the few thousand decoder boxes that allow them
to be retransmitted into cable TV homes. In this regard,
the IBS is preparing a paper to be presented to the I&B
ministry.