|
The investigation found that a number of people in independent
production companies working for the BBC were offered an unspecified
payment by an undercover Sunday Times reporter in exchange
for featuring products on air and the BBC "is deeply reassured"
that in every case this offer was refused. In none of the programmes
investigated did anyone give guarantees that a product would be
featured if it was supplied for free or at a reduced cost.
In many cases where the Sunday Times alleged that products
seen in programmes had been supplied for free by companies, the
investigation found that they had either in fact been paid for by
the programme, or in one case was personal property lent to the
programme by a member of the production team.
The investigation found that in every case where products had been
sourced for free, this was done in accordance with the BBC's guidelines.
However, the investigation found that in some of the programmes
reviewed there were instances of product prominence which were not
fully editorially justified.
Whilst inclusion of the products was justified, the way that they
were shot went beyond the minimum visibility recommended in the
BBC's guidelines. In no instance was there an inducement to feature
them on air.
In addition, the investigation noted that an independent programme
maker had acknowledged he had been unwise to entertain a hypothetical
conversation with an undercover reporter about featuring a product
in a programme in production.
|