| |
| Indiantelevision.com's
interview SET Discovery president Anuj Gandhi |
| |
|
'Higher
price cap than Rs 5 would have allowed us to play within that float' |
|
|
| Posted
on 26 February 2007 |
| |
| SET
Discovery has been riding high on the wave of ICC cricket for over four years.
Having the ICC Championship and World Cup in a single year, the company is targeting
a 40 per cent growth in turnover to end 2006-07 at Rs 4.5 billion. In
an interview with Indiantelevision.com's Sibabrata Das, SET Discovery president
Anuj Gandhi talks of the challenges digital cable faces and how the distribution
scenario would shape up in future to impact the pay-TV broadcasting business in
India. Excerpts: |
| |
|
Are you happy with the way Cas has rolled out so far? We are terribly
disappointed. The multi-system operators (MSOs) were not fully prepared. Their
systems were not in place and there weren't enough set-top boxes (STBs). Some
operators were even providing boxes without smart cards. |
|
|
MSOs say broadcasters created an uncertain environment till the end by approaching
the courts. Isn't it true that they got very little time for actual preparedness?
There was enough indication that Cas would happen. We were challenging the
pricing and not introduction of Cas. Broadcasters signed their contracts with
the MSOs on time. Some local cable operators (LCOs) who were against Cas, moved
the courts but could get nothing in their favour. If Cas has to take off, this
blame game has to stop. All the stakeholders have to play their role. |
|
|
Is it a case of low consumer demand for boxes? That is a separate issue
and, if need be, can be tackled with different marketing schemes. We are in a
situation where the MSOs aren't quite ready. There is lack of information flowing
into us, the subscriber forms have not been filled up, and in some Cas markets
analogue signals are available of popular general Hindi entertainment channels
in prime time. |
|
|
Why then couldn't this market substantially move to direct-to-home? DTH
is more expensive. It has a higher entry price and there is no big subsidy on
the STBs. Besides, DTH operators took time to service this market. With cable
operators not capitalising heavily on Cas, we have lost an opportunity to create
a build up for a massive ramp up in demand for STBs at the time of the World Cup. |
|
| Will
the World Cup drive a 40 per cent penetration in STBs as predicted by some positive
analysts? We see the World Cup acting as a catalyst and expect the STB
penetration to touch 45-50 per cent in the Cas markets. Only when we reach that
level can all the stakeholders make money. Already DTH service providers Tata
Sky and Dish TV have announced their schemes for the World Cup. MSOs should also
be sorting out their issues and coming out with a plan for the big event. |
| |
|
Is SET Discovery targeting a revenue of Rs 4.5 billion in 2006-07 on the back
of the World Cup? We have set an aggressive target this year and are going
to hit it. We will benefit from key cricketing events like the ICC Champions Trophy
and the World Cup. Besides, we had cricket on Ten Sports. For the first time,
we would be capturing revenues from DTH as we signed up Dish TV and Tata Sky during
the year. |
|
|
Will Cas affect the business? In the overall scenario, Cas has a very
limited number of cable and satellite homes. Besides, Cas has come into effect
only in the last quarter of the fiscal. |
|
|
Do you see broadcasters dropping prices of their weaker channels in a bid to push
sale of STBs? With a price cap on a la carte channels at Rs 5, it won't
make business sense to further drop rates. The whole justification for this is
to have higher volumes. But we could have got the current levels of box penetration
with a more liberal pricing. |
| |
| 'DTH
growth for the last six months has been as we had expected. It is only digital
cable numbers which have been disappointing' |
|
|
|
Are you suggesting a price ceiling but at a higher rate? This would have
allowed us to play within that float. We could have weighed the weaker channels,
observed their relative strengths in the marketplace, and come up with a differential
pricing while staying competitive. The whole subscription model at Rs 5 doesn't
give us scope for such pricing play and is unfair to niche channels. There is
precious little that content providers can do and dropping prices would be bad
for the MSOs as well. Besides, we haven't yet got any billing data from the MSOs
on the Cas subscribers to chalk out a strategy. |
|
|
Are you planning to take any action as the deadline has crossed? It should
have come to us by 15 February, but we haven't received any information from them
yet. If we don't get any feedback from them in the next few days, we will issue
them notices as specified by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai)
in order to safeguard our interests. |
|
|
Trai is trying to push for voluntary Cas. How do you think this can speed up in
other parts of the country? Digitisation is a reality but will take a
while to happen. Cas has been a learning process and we have to evolve a phase-wise
strategy for digitalisation. We have to fix a sunrise and a sunset date where
we have to give adequate time taking into account availability of boxes, prices
and investments by MSOs. |
|
|
|
MSOs are saying that broadcasters should be more understanding and not ask for
more subscribers in voluntary digitalisation as the collection of money from the
LCOs doesn't improve. Isn't entering into commercial agreements between MSOs and
broadcasters crucial for the success of voluntary Cas? The analogue and
the digital markets have to be distinguished. The MSOs can't argue that they can't
recover money and so can't pass it on to us. Then how will broadcasters make money
from voluntary Cas? There has to be some incentive for broadcasters to push for
digitalisation. |
|
In
the newly notifuied Cas market, we are seeing a three-MSO play. Do broadcasters
welcome such a strong wave of consolidation? There shouldn't be a problem
so long as the business is transparent. If there was one monopoly player emerging
in the cable TV distribution arena, then it would have concerned us. Besides,
the market is large enough for other players to emerge. And the independent operators
who have aligned with the MSOs would continue to remain as franchisees. We don't
see them disappearing from the chain. |
|
Will carriage spread to new towns where Tam has expanded its reach? It
is too soon to say how carriage will impact in Tam's new panel. A lot will depend
on how the channels are getting affected. The market has more or less stabilised.
Broadly, however, as ratings towns get added, carriage will move there. But I
don't see budgets of broadcasters towards carriage really bloating. What would
happen is that they would be picking and choosing the places where they want better
placement and carriage. |
|
When
do you see DTH significantly contributing to the kitty of the pay-TV broadcasters?
It will take DTH a while for getting those numbers. But it has certainly started
impacting the business because MSOs are having to think twice before blacking
out channels so that they don't upset their subscribers. And DTH growth for the
last six months has been as we had expected. It is only digital cable numbers
which have been disappointing, but we will soon see that changing too. |
|
SET
Discovery will have no cricket to play with in the next fiscal while in the GEC
space, Sony TV is dropping in ratings. How tough will it be for the company to
post growth? Cricket, no doubt, is a big play in India. In a MSO market,
you can still do with no big impact hitting us. But when you go down into the
interiors, this is the only driver. We have grown rapidly for over four years
on the back of cricket. We will try to maintain what we have and ask for realistic
increases. But we have no channel as such that will make carriage on cable networks
a problem; there is strength in our bouquet. |
| |
| Go
to Top |
| Click
for Executive Dossier Archives |
| |
| |
|
|
| |