|
|
|
| Indiantelevision.com's
interview with Lemon CEO and NCD Ravi Deshpande |
| |
|
'Indian
advertising is 80 per cent mediocre, 15 per cent competent
and 5 per cent brilliant'
|
|
|
| Posted
on 4 September 2004 |
| |
|
His
dream agency is now well in place. Following the motto of ideas
being indispensable to brands and where no job is ever referred
to as 'it's only advertising', the man continues to reek of passion.
After truly surviving the toughest phase in advertising barely three
months after Lemon opened its gates, with the world reeling under
the effect of September 11, this man stuck to his guns and stood
by his conviction of Lemon evolving to be an advertising agency
with a future focus.
This
former national creative director of Contract Advertising led Contract
to the position of the number one creative agency in India. The
man's touch definitely seems to grow with time. Bagging some very
strategic accounts, he has managed to steer his 'Lemon' ship to
some steady shores. The future holds some big dreams for the man
and like they say, "No guts, no glory."
The
man himself - Lemon's CEO and national creative director Ravi Deshpande
in an in-depth free-wheeling conversation with indiantelevision.com's
Sonali
Krishna reflecting on the past and beaming about the future.
Excerpts:
|
|
|
It's been three years since Lemon debuted, tell me how was name
Lemon coined and what significance does it hold to the philosophy
of the agency?
Well, we were going through the process of hunting for names,
a friend of mine suggested a name that actually emerges from the
headline of a legendary ad. The famous Volkswagen ad with the one
word headline 'Lemon'. I instantly liked it. Seemed like a wonderful
idea to be called 'Lemon' - the ad written by the brilliant Bill
Bernbach who has contributed so significantly to the business of
advertising, inspired so many people, so many agencies.
But
on the other hand, 'Lemon' did have a negative connotation. What
it really meant was - "We pick the lemons so you get the plums."
So yes, we might be the underdogs and that's fair enough. On the
other hand when people usually think of 'Lemon' as the citrus fruit
or freshly squeezed ideas, that suits me fine too.
It's
a name that I hope someday gets associated with the brand of advertising
that most people find responsible and exciting.
|
| |
|
In
the last three years, what has been the turning point for the agency
and also what has been the single most key learning for you in capacity
of CEO?
There has been more than one turning point. The acquisition
of Cadbury was one. The acquisition of Onida was another.
I believe
that a business so intense, so challenging, so demanding and so
creative needs far greater respectability than what it commands
today. In an environment where clients typically question the agency's
effort and its value for money, we have been able to gain our clients'
respect by sheer hard work and delivery. So, that's primarily my
key learning.
Put
in tremendous effort with a clear conscience. And even if the world
is going some other way, it will turn to look at your point of view.
So while the business is losing respectability at a macro level,
I think we at Lemon have done our best to earn our clients' respect
by working the Lemon way.
|
| |
|
You
have recently bagged the BBC and Zoom creative accounts? How did
you manage that? What does your client profile look like now?
There
was a pitch involved in both cases. What went right for us in the
BBC World pitch was that the creative team and the strategy team
were fans of the channel. They still are. So they had a good understanding
of the personality of BBC World from the very beginning which naturally
came handy during the pitch and after it, of course. Our advertising
reflected our knowledge on how a brand like BBC World should communicate
to its consumer. We got the tone of voice right. Insightful and
witty without being funny or outrageous.
In
a television channel such as Zoom, you had to paint the picture
of a channel that is full of glamour, high life and support that
with pretty imagery. The client was aware that there are people
in Lemon who could deliver that to the identity and advertising
of the channel. That's how they approached us. And we have managed
to give them some fresh work in this category.
In
terms of our current client profile, this is what it looks like:
Cadbury's - working with four brands currently - Temptation, Delite,
Milk treat and two developmental brands that are yet to take off.
Onida
- we are handling the business of washing machines, air conditioners
and their most basic brand of televisions - Igo TV.
Then
there is Birla Viscose, Morphy Richards, Gili Jewelry, Inox Multiplex,
Oxemberg among others.
|
| |
|
|
"Put
in tremendous effort with a clear conscience. And even if the
world is going some other way, it will turn to look at your
point of view" |
|
| |
|
According
to you, it is crucial to generate ideas that are indispensable to
brands. Could you give me a snapshot of the work Lemon has done
which holds true to the above statement?
The work done on Cadbury Delite where we positioned the product
as a facilitator to make milk taste good through its chocolate base,
was seamless with the brand. So, we thought that instead of creating
another statement why don't we just say 'it makes milk fun.' And
no mom in her right mind would find that objectionable. The moment
you make it easier for moms to get their kids to drink milk, you
make them happy. Also, where kids' beverage is concerned, the communication
has to be acutely responsible.
You
couldn't possibly be saying something absolutely incredible. So
all we are saying is that it makes your milk tasty, which is very
responsible and a real benefit being provided. The idea 'Doodh se
dosti kar lo' is fairly inseparable from the brand, because it originates
from the truth about the brand.
When
it comes to Inox Multiplex, which is the first national chain of
movie multiplexes
you can actually have a lifelike movie experience
there. Thanks to its impeccable technology and ambience, Inox is
probably the best place to watch a movie exactly the way the artists
created it. So
we crafted our communication around 'Live the movie'.
Then
there is Gili. Gili is essentially small and delicate jewelry you
could wear everyday. It is obviously meant to enhance the way a
woman looks and feels. Our observation and research pointed to the
fact that jewelry is one category that's not just high involvement
but also involves frequent transactions. People buy jewelry after
a lot of thinking, either for themselves or as a gift. All jewelry
ads ultimately have the picture of a pretty woman with a somewhat
nice neckpiece, usually with her hand on her cheek to display the
ring, with an incredible sounding statement next to her. There is
an enormous parity in the category itself.
So,
how does one jewelry brand differ from the other. That's when it
struck us that it is not just a plain simple transaction but an
emotional one. Whether you buy it for someone or for yourself, there
is a strong emotion and a very strong reason at least six out of
10 times, to buy it. So we thought of, 'Every Gili has a story.
What's yours?' Now the brand has taken a bigger shape and as Gili
starts to grow in the market along with this advertising proposition,
it will automatically get the stature it deserves.
So
these are some of the ideas that I think are inseparable from the
brand.
|
| |
|
What
is more important - effective advertising or creative advertising?
Let me put it this way. For your advertising to be effective, you
have to say something interesting and relevant about the brand to
your consumer. So he gets hooked. And you have to say it well. So
he stays hooked.
It's
hard to do effective advertising without some creativity in it.
Nobody's looking forward to switch on the TV and then get bored.
So
the best way to ensure effective advertising is to make it interesting,
entertaining and involving all within the given strategy. Which
has got to be interesting too, if not always path-breaking.
Path
breaking strategies are rare. You have to be creative to come up
with one. Effectiveness
and creativity are not and never were mutually exclusive.
|
| |
|
"Most
commercials who have tried their hand at humour have failed"
|
 |
|
| |
|
But
isn't 'It makes milk fun' more effective advertising than creative?
I think it is very creative because, when you come in with chocolate
in a bottle, your temptations to say 20 other things before you
actually say something so simple, is very high. There's a good chance
that it may not occur to you. Because you have not made that product
keeping that in mind. You just have a formula available to make
normal milk taste like chocolate milk. We are telling kids to "make
friends with milk".
Now,
one can stretch that argument where the expression can be very creative.
Because it is the 'how' part that typically makes the communication
creative.
Volvo
says, 'I am a safe car'. Now, you can turn around and say, "How
is that creative?" All they are saying is that it is a safe
car. Isn't that expected? But then you see this extraordinary safety
pin ad on Volvo. That's when you realise how creative it really
is.
So,
sometimes your proposition can be a simple sounding statement, but
the execution of that statement can be out of the box, never seen
before
which makes the whole package creative.
On the other hand, there are times you can find a proposition which
is never though of before. Like in the case of Haagen-Dazs. For
instance, Haagen-Dazs used sex explicitly in its ice cream advertising.
The headline was 'Melt together' and the picture was ice cream dripping
on someone's body and the woman licking it off. So, it was a very
different way of looking at ice cream.
So,
we keep searching for both. And at the time when we are making our
final decision, we go either this way or that way. Sometimes, it
actually helps in a country like ours to stick with a simple proposition
and make the 'how' part exciting so that the fundamental message
is understood.
|
| |
|
You had once said that a larger portion of Indian advertising is
highly mediocre and only a handful can compete with the best from
all over the world. Why should Indian advertising compete with the
world, when our market and culture is so uniquely different and
classical?
See, excellence is a genetic need. We want to be as powerful as
America and if that were not the case, why would we build missiles
which are as good as America's. Why are we now saying that we are
the best when it comes to IT?
There
is this inherent urge to be the best regardless of the field you
are operating in. Why should advertising and marketing be any different?
There is this phenomenal population available for selling products
and there is a challenge in selling those products in the most imaginative
way.
I continue
to say Indian advertising is 80 per cent mediocre, 15 per cent competent
and 5 per cent brilliant. (It's probably the same in every other
business). Look at the big Indian brands today, all that they do
is come up with a jingle, some image clichés from different
parts of the country and they feel their job is done. The job is
not done; it's undone with that activity. One wonders why these
brands want to spend big money by putting some clichéd imagery
with a jingle. Does it really work? I'm not so sure and even if
it does, is there something that can work better? Have they looked
hard enough? These seem like quick fixes. And they feel that showing
people from different parts of the country and weaving it together
through a song and keep blasting it through a cricket match is the
way you drive your brand message home.
How many commercials have tried their hand at humour and have failed?
Because what is funny for you may not be funny to me and a million
others. Look at commercials that give you an information overload
in those 30 seconds through supers, multi-layered visuals, too many
people. This is a true wastage of funds. Because, if you track advertising
and I have, you will realise that maximum advertising falls into
this cluster. Most advertisers spend their money creating messages
that are lost. They can definitely get better creative for the money
they invest. This is an opportunity lost.
India
is a very diverse country. Every region has different food habits
and different way of looking at life, languages, dialects within
them. So the thing that can be called Indian is probably our value
systems which is respecting parents, studying hard for exams, finding
a great job and celebration of certain festivals.
So,
the only thing that will tie in together is an idea that is universally
appealing.
Well,
when Levi's says you will look cool and sexy in our 501's, whether
it's New York, Paris, Mumbai or Nasik, that emotion that 'I will
look cool and sexy', transcends all the barriers, cuts across all
the languages. So that's the key.
|
| |
|
|
"Permanently
relying on just programming in order to garner better TRP's
and better attention from viewers, is wrong" |
|
| |
|
Tell me about Lemon's work culture and how it aids the agency's
creative productivity? And also about 'Lemon Extract'.
Well,
we start by telling out client something we truly believe in. That
we are their 'Brand conscience'. We are usually fearless in expressing
our ideas and point of view. We have people from intense strategic
planning disciplines, trying very hard to analyse the data, market
and the consumer's mind.
As
this happens, creatives and strategic planners are working together
right from the word go. The area where we differ from the others,
is the way we look at ideas first and rules later.
This
whole process called 'Lemon Extract' is essentially about mining
for ideas. It's about getting as many solutions as possible. After
ideation, comes the process of filtration. And since all of us have
worked in larger agencies, we successfully throw away the stuff
that has never helped us. And retain what's most fresh and potent.
|
| |
|
What are Lemon's long term goals and would you say Lemon has arrived
or is that yet to happen?
Lemon
is on its way to being a great agency. A very good option for large
businesses since most of us are experienced and have worked on almost
all categories. Everyone here has contributed to building good brands.
The
last three years have been some of the hardest that this planet
has seen for the advertising industry as a whole. And we stood that
test. I think we have done very well in these three years. There's
a good distance traveled and there is a lot more to be done in terms
of exploring different markets.
As
far as our long term goal is concerned - I think Lemon should be
an agency that is a force to reckon with, that receives global acceptance,
that gets spoken of in the same breath as some of the world hottest
agencies. That will be nice. So, that's my vision. An unconventional
agency that creates big brands.
|
| |
|
Channel branding; is that going to be a growing category in advertising?
Also what other new categories do you see entering the advertising
gamut?
I
think so. Permanently relying on just programming in order to garner
better TRP's and better attention from viewers, is wrong. It's difficult
to provide absolutely original software not seen on any other channel,
all the time. But while channels are busy creating software, what
is also important is the creation of a relationship with the viewer.
And that can only be done through advertising. Something that Fox
Sports does all the time. It just makes Fox Sports look very cool.
So,
even if something as boring as billiards is happening, the channel
will still look cool, thanks to its image.
|
| |
|
What
new categories do you see coming into advertising?
I
think retail in terms of malls have been mushrooming. Sooner than
later the number of malls will get saturated within a certain area.
That certainly is going to need branding. Or else the consumer will
choose the mall depending on what's closer.
So
retail in this country, is at a point from where it will only grow.
And this will necessitate a sharp differentiation. Another category
I see is largely in the entertainment arena is movie multiplexes.
Inox has come in, PVR is around, Fame Adlabs is another major player.
Although, I don't see them spending a lot of money in advertising
yet, it is an emerging category with a lot of promise.
|
| |
|
Considering
the fact that the advertising industry is not growing at a very
high rate, how do you think smaller agencies like yourself are going
to survive?
It
has been three years of a rocky road, but we have grown and grown
with heavy-duty margins. So, obviously there is a definite need
for such agencies. We are very selective about the businesses we
pick up. And so we are in a better position to give attention to
our clients. Also, our agency has eliminated things like too many
offices, and other areas like media and the rest where one's attention
is diluted. And therefore, agencies like us will not only survive
but grow and give clients better value for money.
|
| |
|
Is
the Indian market evolutionary or revolutionary?
Evolutionary. Obviously. The revolution was over by 1947.
|
| |
Hence would you agree that advertising in India also has to be evolutionary
and not revolutionary?
Interesting question. Naturally even in advertising there is going
to be a process of evolution. But it might not be such a bad idea
to bring in a little bit of revolution because the advertising produced
most of the time is so boring. And even an evolutionary market has
a right to good music, a funny movie, a joke or a good ad. If we take
that away, we would be going further back in evolution. |
| |
|
Coming
to media trends today, it is no small generalisation to state that
the market's negotiability has driven our industry to become buying-led;
both agencies and advertisers are pushing media owners for even
greater rate reductions. Is this a progression or regression?
We
are not pushing media agencies. Everything is being decided by advertisers.
In most cases, clients appoint media agencies independently.
I think
we need to go back to the basics. Firstly, if there is going to
be more and more product parity and furious competition in the market
place, the only thing that will help sell and create a fantastic
image for one's brand, is advertising.
Considering advertising is so crucial to give that impetus to a
brand, why are you taking money away from that particular area?
You need to be giving money to creative agencies as well as media
agencies that carry out the enormous job of finding the relevant
media to ensure maximum mileage for a brand. The current stringent
cost negotiation and cutting it down to bone is not going to be
good for the brand. Because brands need good advertising. Good advertising
needs good people. And good people have to be given good money.
As
the saying goes, "if you pay peanuts, you will get monkeys".
|
| |
|
Why is there a constant war between creative and servicing?
I'm
glad you asked. That was one of the very strong reasons I started
Lemon. It probably starts with the divided responsibility. Typically
client servicing has the responsibility of managing accounts, setting
targets in terms of billing and achieving them in isolation and
creative is expected to provide the right creative solution. And
when there's no sync between the two, when they are two divided
departments, I felt typically the time taken for the client servicing
to write a brief would be very long or would not have adequate meat
in it for the creative people to feel inspired. That has always
been a shortcoming in what is called 'the brief' in our business.
Sometimes the brief was truly to blame. And at other times it was
the creative hiding behind the excuse of a bad brief, for lack of
a good idea.
So,
that was the kind of nonsense I use to see for years where creative
felt that account managers did not do their job well and account
managers constantly felt that creative is irresponsible. Both wasted
a fair amount of time.
It
seemed to me, the solution was a model that does not allow them
to see their functions differently. And if one could work out this
joint responsibility in this wall-less structure it could be a better
model to work.
At
Lemon, the creative and servicing are connected at all times internally
and even at client meetings. And this friendship is working for
us.
|
| |
|
Your
life has been pretty focused on achieving your objectives. What
about the personal side to Ravi Deshpande? Does it exist?
There
has been so much to do that there hasn't been much of a personal
space. So, it has taken some toll on my personal life, hobbies and
other interests. I also haven't been able to give adequate attention
at home. But I do my best to try and live up to the expectations
of my family.
|
| |
|
Are
you a good leader?
I
hope I'm not a bad one (laughs).
|
| |
| Click
for archives |
| |
|
|
|
|
|