| Indiantelevision.com's
interview with India TV promoter Rajat Sharma |
| |
|
|
"There
is only one competitor and it would not be difficult to overtake
that"
|
|
| (Posted
on 2 June 2004) |
| |
|
From
living in a one-room tenement in Delhi to the city's up market Pamposh
Enclave has been a long trek for Rajat Sharma, one of Indian television's
best known faces. However, even he admits that luck has played an
important part in shaping his life and career. One stroke of luck
came in the late 1980s when Zee Telefilms supremo Subhash Chandra,
looking at starting a new venture in India, convinced Sharma to
conceive a TV programme that would empower the average citizen,
while putting on the dock people in seats of power. Thus was
Aap Ki Adalat born and the rest as they say is history. Incidentally,
the show with its original name is slated to stage a comeback on
Sharma's news channel - India TV.
Today,
as Sharma surveys his about-to-be-finished office room on the studio
complex situated on a massive 80,000 sq. ft of space, there is a
look of satisfaction on his face. His life and business partner
- as he loves to describe her - Ritu Dhawan comfortably pales into
the shadowy background, letting Sharma hog the limelight, while
she tightens the nuts and bolts of the business venture.
But
apart from satisfaction, there is also a bit of anxiety as Sharma
has just turned a broadcaster from being a TV software producer.
His dream of having a news channel of his own has come true as India
TV, a 24-hour Hindi-language news channel, attempts flexing its
muscles in the already overcrowded news channel market in India.
Sharma is also realising that having personal and school friends
in high places - former Prime Minister AB Vajpayee's foster son-in-law
Ranjan Bhattacharya, lawyer-turned-politician Arun Jaitley, Delhi
University students' union neta-turned-politician Vijay Goel, former
minister Pramod Mahajan, to name a few - has its pros and cons.
Though he is willing to come clean on his business associates, according
to one of the theories doing the rounds of the industry, India TV
venture is funded by people who are sympathisers of the Bharatiya
Janata Party.
Still,
Sharma is unfazed. He is slowly realising that one has to pay a
lot for success and that too in a cut-throat world of television.
In between concentrating on building on his dream, Sharma spoke
to indiantelevision.com's Anjan Mitra.
Excerpts:
|
|
|
What has been basis of starting India TV?
For me, India TV is not merely a news channel, it's a movement
to give more credibility to TV news reporting. It's an endeavour
to give the viewers a feeling that there is a channel that stands
up for their rights, for them. Rather, I'll invite everybody to
join me in the movement.
|
| |
|
Do
you mean that other news channels are everything else except credible?
The channel has been in the making for the last one and a half
years. During this time, I traveled all over India, met people and
got feedback on news channels. The feedback that I got was that
people are getting increasingly fed up with sensational news reporting
as news channels' editorial policies were getting dictated by commercial
considerations. People wanted a channel that they could trust.
|
| |
|
Was
that the reason why the channel has an ambitious tag line, which
says 'Desh badalna hai to, channel badlo' (if you want to change
the country, change your channel)?
That is the line that is used in promotional campaign of India TV.
I'd say the tag line of India TV is 'Badle Bharat Ki Tasveer' (Will
change the face of India). The idea is to help people see the changing
face of India and also play a role changing the face of the country.
Before launching the channel, we had IMRB carry out a survey as
to what the expectations were from India TV. The survey showed that
people associated credibility with the name of Rajat Sharma. Their
expectation was to get responsible reporting from Rajat Sharma.
Such feedback went into conceptualising the channel.
|
| |
"A
survey done by IMRB revealed that people associated credibility
with the name of Rajat Sharma"
|
 |
|
| |
Considering
you have started India TV with such lofty ideals, do you think there
is room for another news channel in the country as the advertising
pie hasn't increased that rapidly and there are others who already
have a head start?
A lot depends on the way you create content. I don't see any reason
why revenue should not follow quality programming because quality
programming would get you the viewers. |
| |
|
You
haven't answered the question that there are other established channels
already pulling in revenue and it would be that much more difficult
for a new product to break that stranglehold...
Most of the news channels that are there in the market are,
I'd say, look-alike channels. It's like the Bollywood formula. You
have one success story and the others are all pocket editions of
that success story.
I feel, there is only one competition and it would not be difficult
to overtake that.
|
| |
|
Do
you mean apart from Aaj Tak, there is no competition for India TV?
I would not like to take names, but let me assure you that we
are totally confident of ourselves and that we would be able to
achieve what we have set out to do - that is become the real No.
1.
|
| |
 |
"In
India TV, the endeavour is to build up other brand names"
|
|
| |
|
Since
you feel that most news channels are look-alikes of the success
story, is one of the reasons that the same set of limited people
are doing the rounds of various channels?
Maybe
one of the reasons is that. But I feel there is no dearth of talent
in the country. You need to identify them, nurture them and let
them bloom. Though it may sound as if I am bragging, but most of
the heads of news channels now have sometime or the other worked
with me in the past.
This
goes to show that if you let people be, their talent would flower.
That is why, in India TV, the endeavour is to build up other brand
names too.
|
| |
|
You
are getting people associated with the channel who are more seen
on page three. What sort of message would this send out to viewers?
I would not agree with that analysis. Take, for example, Maneka
Gandhi. Nobody can deny that she is an authority today where environment
is concerned. Then there is Tarun Tejpal (of Tehelka fame). He is
someone who is synonymous with crusading against corruption. There
is Nafisa Ali too. She may be appearing on page three oft and on,
but you cannot deny that her involvement with social service is
genuine.
|
| |
|
When
do you think the venture would break even?
Hopefully in a year's time we should reach the break-even point.
Our belief has been confirmed after the response that we have got
initially from the cable operators and viewers.
|
| |
The
channel is still facing severe distribution problems. Wouldn't it
upset the business plans?
I agree there are some distribution problems, but I am also sure that
our distribution team would be able to iron out the differences successfully.
But we are not here to pay the cable operators to carry India TV.
Our refrain, rather request, is that we are giving a quality product
that ought to be carried on the strength of its content.
(Indiantelevision.com's information is that several cable
operators in Delhi, at least, have refused to carry India TV on
their networks as, reportedly, 'carriage fee' was not given. Their
excuse: There are already so many news channels and adding more
channels would put their network under strain.)
|
| |
"We
are not here to pay the cable operators to carry India TV"
|
 |
|
| |
How
different is the on-air look and is there any innovative marketing
plans for selling airtime?
For the on-air look, you should see for yourself and decide. Ours
is an uncluttered look that has been designed by a person who is responsible
for the on-air look of the likes of CNBC, ABC, etc. in the US. There
are several other things like an animated logo, but these are all
facts that should come as feedback from the viewers and not from us.
(Incidentally, India TV's logo is the first animated TV logo in
India where its colour too changes according to the day part. That
would mean the day time colour is different from the evening time.)
Unlike others, who have been going overboard with advertisements,
we have only eight minutes of commercial time every hour and in
between news bulletins there is space enough for just one advertisement.
This, again, ensures that an advertiser doesn't have to fight for
recall.
|
| |
Newer
modes of delivery are slated to come to India, including DTH, broadband
and even MMDS (multi-purpose, multi-point distribution system). Is
India TV open to joining such platforms?
Of course. Our programming and business plan have taken such developments
into account. |
| |
Have
broadband players like Reliance and Bharti approached India TV to
be part of their network?
Several such players, including Reliance, have approached us and the
matter is under consideration. (India TV, anyway, uses Reliance's
fibre optic network from 100-odd locations in the country to send
TV feeds to the broadcast center). We have also got offers from the
US to work out a distribution mechanism there, where we wouldn't have
to pay to be on a network. A few non-resident Indians did make an
offer to this regard, but at this moment our focus is to establish
the channel in India before we start looking outside. We also plan
to remain a digital free to air channel. |
| |
How
true is the Indian TV folklore that Subhash Chandra was responsible
for your entry into television?
It's absolutely true. I must admit that but for Subhashji, I wouldn't
have got into TV. I only had ideas, but he persuaded me to turn those
ideas into a reality. I enjoyed every moment of my five-year stay
in Zee. That is why for the party to celebrate my 'adalat' show's
completion of 150 episodes, I invited Subhashji too. (The party held
in Delhi's Ashoka Hotel several years back was attended by News Corp
chairman Rupert Murdoch and the then Prime Minister Atal B Vajpayee,
amongst a houseful of who's who of India. Chandra did not turn up
for the do). |
| |
Also
enjoyed the acrimonious breakup?
Well, those are things of the past. |
| |
 |
"Ernst
& Young has valued India TV to be worth Rs 1 billion"
|
|
| |
How
true is the buzz that you had been in talks with Rupert Murdoch's
Star for heading Star News when the channel came under Star's control?
Several options were discussed, but they did not work out. But let
me clarify that the talks did not only center around me heading a
channel. |
| |
You
had told us in the past that you would like to start an entertainment
channel also. What is the status of those plans?
Somewhere down the line, we would have that too. It's more Ritu's
dream than mine. I have promised her (an entertainment channel) and
she would have one. But at the moment the whole focus is on establishing
India TV.
(Ritu informs us that, probably, towards the latter half of next
year, work on the entertainment channel would start).
|
| |
|
You
have been avoiding a direct reference, but how much did it cost
you to set up this swanky state-of-the art complex with four studio
floors?
I wouldn't be knowing how much exactly was spent, but the project
cost was around Rs 700 million. So, I assume we must have invested
that much, though Ernst & Young has valued the company (India
TV) to be worth Rs 1 billion.
Also
read:
India TV campaign
stresses difference in outlook
(Pictures by SANJAY SHARMA/Indiapix
Network)
|
| |
| |
| Click
for archives |
| |
|
|