|
The
print media scene in the country is set for exciting times ahead.
Recently the Financial Times of London announced that it
picked up a 13.85 per cent of equity stake in Business Standard
for Rs 140.1 million.
All
editions of the Business Standard carry one page of Financial
Times content from Monday to Saturday. FT's content also appears
on Business Standard's website.
Indiantelevision.com's
correspondent Ashwin Pinto caught up with Financial
Times Asia editor and publisher John Ridding for a quick chat
on the sidelines of a media briefing. Based in Hong Kong. he is
also part-time chairman of Pearson, the group which owns the FT,
in Asia.
John was the deputy editor of the FT from September 2001
to July 2003. Before taking up that position, he had been the managing
editor for two years. Joining the FT in 1987, he held a series
of reporting and editing posts, including Hong Kong bureau chief,
Paris correspondent, deputy features editor, Korea correspondent,
UK companies reporter and foreign desk correspondent. Between 1986
and 1987, John worked at Oxford Analytica on the Asia Pacific desk.
Could
you provide an overview of the strategy of The Financial
Times?
Broadly
in a nutshell our strategy is to be the dominant global source of
business news and analysis.
Last year we completed the final piece in the jigsaw puzzle which
was the Asia expansion. We are very
strong in the UK, Europe and US. More than two thirds of our circulation
comes outside our home market.
I
think that this shows that we are thoroughly international. It also
means that we have an independent balanced view of the world. We
dont have a US, UK or a European agenda. We are very international
in our perspective. Our journalists including myself have worked
in many countries. So we have a very balanced view of world politics
and economics.
The
second important strategy is that in all of our markets wherever
we are our focus is the top end of the market. It is the decision
makers, chief executives, the finance directors and the top
politicians. So we are not necessarily trying to sell millions of
copies. However we do want to make sure that anyone who is influential
and who is making significant decisions in business, finance, politics
and society read the FT. Our message is that if they are
not reading the FT then they are losing out. They are not as well
informed as they should be. So it is really about targeting that
top end of the market.
What
are you hoping to achieve through tying up with Business Standard?
Our
relationship with The Business Standard is a symbol of our
broad global strategy. This is to find
partners in markets that share the same vision as we do. We feel
that the Indian business audience is
growing rapidly. It is becoming increasingly global in its perspective.
Therefore
a combination of a newspaper that puts forth quality news and analysis
on India along with quality news and analysis on the global economy
seems to be very complimentary and very competitive. Our aim is
for businessmen and senior politicians to read the Business Standard
if they want to get the best information.
What
is the kind of content that we can expect to appear from FT
on Business Standard?
The branded page. The FT page will comprise of mainly
international business, economics and finance. Apart from that we
will provide a lot of comment and analysis. Sir Martin Woolf for
example is one of our top commentators. He will appear regularly.
So I think Indian readers will get the best of FTs global
news and analysis.
There is also no fixed amount of Business Standard content
that we would use for FT's Asia edition.
"We
manage to get our global newsroom to work together much more
effectively than any other organisation"
|
|
How
do you view our regulations for the print media, which have been
dogged with controversy?
We
have always played by the rules. We go by the book. That is what
we have done. We have been working with Business Standard
for 11 years. We feel that you have to go by the rules of a particular
society, which is what we are doing.
At
the same time we would like for it to be possible for international
news papers to be printed in India. We fly copies from Dubai into
India. We cannot provide the best service to Indian business readers
because we come later as we cannot print here. It also becomes more
expensive. We feel that Indian business people should be on a level
playing field with the rest of the world. That means getting the
newspaper when they want to which is in the morning.
What
would you say are the key factors that differentiate you from the
competition?
I
would say that they are reliability, quality and and independent
global perspective. We dont have a US, UK or a European agenda.
We maintain our international perspective at all times. We constantly
strive for balance in our views. We manage to get our global newsroom
to work together much more effectively than any other organisation.
This
is achieved by having a team of journalists who have worked together
for quite some time. Therefore they know each other well. I know
the team in New York, the team in London. They know me. We discuss
stories. We dont have first and second class editions across
the world. The FT is a global organisation and every body has the
same set of values, judgments and experiences. As a result of that
we have a very similar vision about the work we are involved with.
Could
you talk about the size of your newsroom?
We have about 25 correspondents and eight editors based in Asia.
We did our expansion by setting up a presence in Asia last year.
We are also further developing our presence in the US. We also hire
journalists from a wide range of backgrounds.
What
are the main challenges facing the global newspaper industry?
There
are a lot of them. Global advertising is going through a difficult
period. However we think that it
is coming back. The balance between electronic and print media has
to be maintained.
People
who say that electronic media will be the death of print media are
wrong. I just think that it changes the nature of print journalism.
Competition in our space is stiff but we are very confident of our
strategy and how we are going about things.
Could
you specify more on the change in print journalism you just mentioned?
What you find with new technologies is that they do not kill the
previous technology. For newspapers that means focusing more on
value added and in-depth reporting as well as exclusives. You can
get commodity news online as well as all the facts, data.
So
there is no point in newspapers merely reproducing facts. Newspapers
have to set the agenda. They have to make complex choices as to
what the most important stories are. They will increasingly need
to reply on more in-depth and quality reporting analysis.
In
common area you need to have perspective. That is how you differentiate
yourself. Again you come back to our reason for teaming up with
Business Standard. They have a similar vision as us about the differentiation.
This is to provide the highest quality and the most reliable news
analysis with the integrity intact over the long term. We are not
in the business of shortcuts and neither are they.
|
"Newspapers
have to set the agenda. They have to make complex choices
as to what the most important stories are"
|
I
read an article recently, which stated that news, which is slanted,
sells more in the US. Is this a trend that is being seen elsewhere
in the world?
I
actually think that most people dont want the news slanted
in a certain direction. Most people would want the news told straight,
balanced and objective.
Besides
Business Standard which are the Asian publications in which
FT has taken a stake in and what is the nature of the deal?
Business Standard is the only Asian publication in which
we have a stake. The FT Group however has a number of joint ventures
outside the region. FTSE International is a JV between us and the
London Stock Exchange. We also have a 50 per cent stake in The Economist
Group.
Recently
the print media abroad was rocked by scandals. You had the Jayson
Blair plagiarising case at the New York Times. Then there
was Stephen Glass who made up stories and sold them off as fact
for publications like Rollingstone. This damages reputation
and credibility. Editorially what safeguards do you have in order
to prevent stories being cooked up on account of a solid lead or
being speculated upon?
We
have a very clear code of conduct. More importantly, we devote a
great deal of time to training and developing the right values and
ethics among our journalists. We also have a rigorous editing process.
For
FT Asia are you using tactics like more colour, photos and
indexes to pull the readers inside?
We have always placed a lot of emphasis on design and accessability.
I believe that the FT is one of the best organised and presented
papers in the market.
As
far as FT.com is concerned one of the problems is that there is
so much great content on the internet for free. How are you able
to meet this challenge?
We believe that our audience is willing to pay for online access
to FT material. This is because our content is very diffgerent
from free material. It is exclusive, value added news and analysis
delivered by specialist reporters who are all experts in their field.
FT.com has 3.7 million unique users a month. We get over 59.6 million
page views. We have been ablke to attract over 76,000 subscribers.
You
earlier mentioned the ad slump. In this scenario controlling and
reducing costs becomes important. How has FT managed this in Asia
and the US?
We
have been very rigorous in our management of costs. We have phased
our expansion and investment in line with the business environment
and have developed a very efficient system for producing our various
international editions.
This
year The Olympics is expected to be a major factor in reviving ad
revenue. To what extent will the print media in Asia benefit from
this?
The Olympics always give a boost to advertising. However for
Asia the impact is significantly greater if the event is held here.
That will be the case in 2008 when the event goes to China.
|