| Indiantelevision.com's
interview with Zee Movie Zone (ZMZ), Zee English, Trendz and MX business
head Ajay Trigunayat |
| |
|
'Star
World is not under pricing Zee English. It is still the number
one choice in its genre'
|
|
|
| Posted
on 5 November 2004 |
| |
|
Ajay
Trigunayat, the new business head of Zee Movie Zone (ZMZ), Zee English,
Trendz and MX takes pride in knowing his numbers right. Managing
the marketing and creative aspects of the business with equal finesse,
Trigunayat joined Zee Network in March 2002 as vice president marketing
for Zee Network. Since then he has handled various departments like
brand management, marketing services, organising Zee Cine Awards
and optimising cross channel promotions.
For
the second time, Trigunayat has taken over the responsibility as
the business head of Zee English, ZMZ (known prior to break up with
content partner MGM as Zee MGM). In an interview with
indiantelevision.com's Trupti Ghag,
he talks about changes since his last stint as a business head between
September 2002 till February 2003, vision for the channels and fickle
world of advertising.
Read
on for a tete-a-tete:
|
| |
|
What are the challenges that you have identified for Zee English
and Zee Movie Zone (ZMZ) in the coming years?
Each
channel has a different battle to fight and it will only get tougher.
So, rather than looking at a cluster of channels, we are treating
each channel as a different entity.
|
| |
|
Is there a content differentiator between the two movie channels?
For starters, MX is a DTH channel and that is a clear differentiator
between ZMZ and MX. As for MX, we will take a decision on our game
plan for the coming year in about 15-20 days, we are currently testing
concepts for MX. We would be focusing on exploiting content that
only DTH technology is equipped to deliver.
|
| |
|
Could
you elaborate on what exactly is it that you are looking at? What
is the immediate game plan?
We
ran a Bond movie festival last month. Post that, in terms
of the channel share, we saw a five per cent jump from October first
week's 14 per cent to 19 per cent, within a span of three weeks.
We are now planning to strengthen this further by showcasing the
Indiana Jones movie festival this month. We are hoping that
this would be bigger than the Bond festival.
Also
in the month of December, we are going to telecast Laws of attraction
starring Julianne Moore and Pierce Bosnan. We are also toying with
the idea of airing the Bourne Identity series made in 2000-2001,
in December. Come January, we also plan to come up with new graphics
and promos for ZMZ, for which research is underway. We are currently
in the process of building our own team.
Right
now we are just evaluating initial feedback from the masses, advertisers
and we're also waiting for the latest Tam results to come in. We
have had a five per cent increase in channel share, and we are targeting
20 to 25 per cent channel share at the end of three to four months.
But
we are more likely to usher in the changes following airing of two
of the big products that we have right now, which are Kill Bill
1 and Kill Bill 2. We have weaved a huge festival in
the month of January around it. Also for the Oscar time we would
be premiering the latest award winner Monster, in February.
|
| |
|
But
you just underwent certain changes post the break off with the content
partner. What is it that you will be looking at?
Essentially
the whole look of the channel, but it all depends on the consumer
feedback. Although the last change was something that we devised
in a very small time, I personally thought it was good. Although,
we did have a very good feedback from most of the quarters, we are
just trying to evaluate if there is a genuine problem with content.
So we have initiated research in the five cities-Delhi, Mumbai,
Ahmedabad, Bangalore and Calcutta.
|
| |
What
I heard is that people aren't quite getting taking up to the linear
logo. Is that true?
Our logo is linear, but so is that of HBO. And our research says
that HBO in terms brand perception is better than Star Movies. While
according to me Star Movies plays better content, but HBO seems to
be a better managed brand. |
| |
|
So
what is the current arrangement with MGM?
As
of now, we have gone independent from 1 October. But even when we
had a content partnership, they were already selling telecast rights
and home video rights for quite a few titles to other broadcasters.
We were also picking up movies from elsewhere.
Contrary
to popular perception, we were not dependent on MGM so much. In
fact, we just have seven movies from MGM library, less that one
per cent of our library strength. Most of our movies come from Miramax,
Paramount and other stellar independent producers. We continue to
have a good relationship with them.
|
| |
|
Has
the break-up helped your brand-ZMZ?
Let's
put it this way, if we have to take the business forward we had
to venture out on our own. Also, since we decided to go independent,
everyone was willing to deal with us. It was not the case earlier.
Other production houses had a concern of putting their movie under
the MGM banner. We wanted to get into movies, which would be aired
first on our channel, something that we had not done earlier.
Currently,
we are talking to a lot of independent producers. In fact, we are
going to visit the American Film Market and are looking at bidding
for several titles.
We
are looking at a complete change and the endeavour would be to get
20-25 per cent of market share in the next three four months.
|
| |
|
'Today,
people see FTV and Trendz in the same light and I think that
is commendable'
|
|
| |
|
So,
are you looking at joining the big guns-Star Movies and HBO- or
are you aiming at creating a separate audience base? What are the
demographics that you are looking at?
We are trying to create a different audience, except that we
are in the exploratory phase right now. We have already initiated
consumer research and it will take another week to analyse that.
In
terms of demographics, our primary focus is for the top six cities
in the age group of 15-45. So, essentially we are looking at people
who are young and aspirational.
|
| |
|
So
would you then be looking at the Indian Diaspora or the crossover
movies?
We are currently looking at the 'crossover movies' genre. Except
that we are still in the exploratory phase and we are looking at
whether we are able to strike a right balance between how much we
pay and how much we can earn from the market place.
|
| |
|
Are
there any structural changes in the team that you are looking at?
We have now combined the programming and marketing team. Traditionally,
we took a person with a strong creative or production background
on board and put him/her in programming. While gets lured in by
the charm of dealing with a foreign studios and programmes of excellent
production value, but when the charm wears off and then the person
wants to do production again. We are working across time zones,
since our transmission facility is in Singapore, we have an early
morning start and we co-ordinate content from US, which is on other
side of the globe and that takes up our evening. So it is not quite
an easy task.
Iinstead
of having one person looking after the marketing and other programming
of the all the four channels, we have one person to look after both
programming and marketing of Zee English and another on ZMZ and
MX and these two people in turn report to a senior who does all
the strategic thinking. As for Trendz, since we have to create content,
we one person on programming and another on marketing, and then
there are people down the line who execute.
|
| |
|
Speaking
about problems, is there a problem with ZMZ distribution post the
break-up?
This is merely a perception and not the reality. There are about
nine MSO's operating, including in Delhi and Mumbai, who found the
channel to be a better product and they pushed it up in better band.
We had a concern with one MSO, but even that will get sorted out
in a couple of days. So there is no problem as far as ZMZ or Zee
English is concerned.
|
| |
|
But
is there a problem with Trendz ?
Yes, we have had a lot of concern with Trendz. Fact is that
Trendz, being a fashion channel is considered a niche channel. We
are still analysing and considering various options.
|
| |
|
What
is that you are looking at as far as Trendz goes?
We have tied up with the Indo-Italian chambers of commerce,
so we covered the Asian fashion week at Milan. Subsequently we also
covered a couple of cities in Italy and we are doing a show called
City lights, plus best of fashion week. We are just trying to get
our fix right and we should be showcasing it in last week of December.
|
| |
|
Is it right to assume that advertising community is not taking Trendz
seriously as well?
As a niche fashion channel, its not been taken seriously and
people feel that it should be a lifestyle channel. But lifestyle
is not glamour. And for people who understand, the description of
lifestyle as 'when life meets style' is slightly silly. We are about
fashion and out thinking consumer will want exactly that- splashing
Fashion in a big way. Today, people see FTV and Trendz in the same
light and I think that is commendable.
Why
the channel is perceived the way it is, are more of a content problem
and not a promotional problem. People get tired of too much ramp
shows but what we aim to offer is fashion in all walks of life and
that is not life style.
|
| |
'ZMZsaw
a five per cent increase in channel share, and we are targeting
20 to 25 per cent channel share at the end of three to four
months'
|
|
| |
|
In
specific terms, what is it that you are looking at delivering?
In
addition to whats in-whats out, hot accessories for the season,
we will also be talking about the lingo, the hotspots you go to
what are the places you would like to go to. Places unseen and other
wise, both in India and abroad. We will make the channel come alive
true to the meaning of its name -Trendz. Yes, it would be about
lifestyle, but only those of the glamour and fashion world.
|
| |
Wasn't
the show 'Diabolical' a move in the same direction?
Yes,
it was. We gave the show a break because it was not in line with the
production standard that we had set. We had set high benchmarks---
international for production value protocols, but which don't necessarily
mean using digi-beta. |
| |
Would
that mean a round of serious promotions are in store?
We
can put up thousand hoardings, issue press ads and create a buzz.
But that is not a long term plan. Look at Zoom, it had the best reception,
the packaging was outstanding, campaigning was outstanding but the
content is not perceived to be good so the viewership is suffering.
Any one can crack packaging and promotions in two weeks but to get
a show right it needs three-four months. |
| |
|
Moving
on to Zee English, what is in store for that channel?
We have a fairly large volume deal with Warner. It provides about
80-90 per cent of our content and will continue to do so. We will
be introducing fresh seasons of all the stellar shows like Friends
(Season 10), Sopranos, West Wing, La Femme Nikita and some newer
shows as well. But the team is still working out on the roll out
process.
We
are concentrating on time band 7 to 11:30 and we are going to pack
it back to back with comedies and dramas. Unlike international audience
who likes to watch weekly, we here like to watch dailies. Something
that we are doing with Will and Grace and Friends
repeats.
|
| |
|
Despite
the good content, perception in the market is that Star World is
a better channel than Zee English. Why is it so?
There are two perceptions. I will not discount the fact that
Star World is perceived to be a better channel. But then again there
is a very strong second perception, that while Star World is excellent
brand and their image is better but that does not lead to consumption.
Even
today, if you were to go by rating, the popular programme to achieve
a whooping 0.77 per cent rating is Will and Grace on Zee English.
Something that has not been achieved by any programme on Star World.
More
than focus on packaging, we decided that if we continue to focus
on providing total content in competition first would be home. Rather
than been known as a better brand, I rather be known as a better
product. I think to that extend we are winning the battle and the
numbers are on our side.
|
| |
|
What
about the advertisers, do they think that you are a better product?
I think that they are starting to think that and that is the
reason why they are putting more monies. People remember shows like
Full House, Friends, Will and Grace, Sopranos, West Wing
and Six Feet Under. People also talk about our earlier shows,
Police Academy, Threes company, Seinfeild and Mad
about you. They all are Zee English shows.
As
far as numbers are concerned, I think it is a world wide problem.
All the systems have been devised to measure mass entertainment
channels, there is nothing in the methodology that is robust enough
and the numbers can vary to degrees of 60-70.
|
| |
Would
you be keen on localisation of programming?
We are not planning any local programming because while it creates
the buzz value in terms of content, it does not get you numbers. And
it even does not become talking point in terms of programmes that
people would like to talk about and discuss. But yes, you might see
new graphics and packaging for Zee English in January. |
| |
How
is Zee English perceived by the media planners? Is Star World under
pricing you?
I don't have the post revamp figures to share with you. But I
don't think that Star World is under pricing us. Our channel is number
one choice as far as this genre is concerned. |
| |
What
are the changes that you have seen in the viewer pattern, since the
last time you were the business head for Zee English and Zee MGM 2002?
For Zee English there is no change in the viewer pattern, except
that when I started on Zee English we did not have too much revenue.
Today, we have a substantial amount of revenue today and I think it
took people quite some time for people to realise that Zee English
has better programmes and this is what people prefer. |
| |
| Click
for archives |
|
|