|
This
is obviously for the non-Cas (conditional
access system) areas, where the last mile
operators (LMOs) are not accountable to
anyone at the moment, and there is nothing
in the existing regulation to take care
of the subscribers.
The
third major issue that Trai is studying
is the fact that in each area, the last
mile has complete monopoly.
Though
the officials refused to expound any further,
the fact is that for some time there has
been a concern that if a subscriber in any
given non-Cas area is unhappy with his cablewallah,
he has no choice but to get his television
signals from the same last mile operator.
This
is because last mile operations are bread
and butter to these small players and each
protects his turf ferociously. Physical
violence is not unheard of, the sufferer
in the end being the subscriber.
However,
regarding price differentials that LMOs
function with, officials said that this
would remain. LMOs charge vastly different
prices for the same service in the same
area, depending on the economic status of
the household.
"Demanding
that the differential be removed and uniformity
ushered in means one is denying television
to the economically challenged classes.
Hence this business model will not be changed,"
the officials explained.
However,
they cautioned that these issue will really
have to await formulating a consultation
paper. It will happen if Trai actually feels
there is a need for regulation after a serious
study of the situation, sources said.
|