| "This
resolution laid the foundation of independent
India's policy with regard to the Print Media.
All the successive governments have been consistently
following it.
"The
same equally applies to Electronic Media
and the content delivery platforms associated
with it viz. DTH, cable service and IPTV,"
the IMG letter says.
It
feels strongly that the underlining rationale
for restricting FDI in media sector both
at content creation level and carriage level
is to prevent the foreigners from gaining
management control of the media entities.
"The
media sector is a very, very sensitive sector
and therefore it has been recognised that
a differential treatment is needed as is
done in various other countries as well.
It may be pointed out that the many advanced
countries continue to maintain a differential
policy on ownership of media sectors / assets
and services such as DTH, cable, etc.
The
IMG letter says that though the US permits
100 per cent FDI in telecom sector, it still
has strict control the in media sector,
including the need for - citizenship of
USA as a precondition for obtaining common
carrier licence.
"Similarly,
in UK, Canada, France, South Korea and Japan
also restrictions on Foreign Direct Investment
are in place so as to safeguard the interest
of their domestic media entities."
"In
view of the above, Indian Media. Group (1MG)
strongly opposes the recommendation of Trai
in this regard and urge upon the government
to straightaway reject the same, being totally
inconsistent with the established media
policy of the country.
This
is because, according to the Group, any
such move has the potential of undermining
the independence, sovereignty and security
of the county.
|