|
MSOs
held that, for instance, in the case of
the recent series of cricket matches, various
suggestions have been made to broadcasters
to form meaningful packages, but the channels
have stepped back on that.
Trai
had asked for details of seeded boxes and
customer choices from the MSOs in a consolidated
form and most of these were handed over,
with MSOs saying that they have no objection
if broadcasters are given access to that.
The
MSOs have admitted that some customers have
not yet stated their choices in the forms,
but the invoices for such customers can
be worked out between the broadcasters and
MSOs mutually, they have said.
On
the issue of paybacks on per-customer basis,
the broadcasters, sources say, had asked
what the MSOs intended to do.
The
MSOs have said that whatever data is there
in the SMS and customer choice data handed
over to the broadcasters, the latter would
have the agreed share of their revenue.
What
has been discussed is the issue of a modality
for switch off for those customers who are
stubborn about not putting in their choices
formally on the forms. But nothing concrete
has emerged out of this so far, sources
said.
One
of the MSOs have stated that they had in
2003, come to some agreement with broadcasters
regarding this issue and Trai has asked
the MSO to state clearly and in detail what
such arrangements were.
The
MSOs have reiterated their position, stating
that Cas has thrown open a programming challenge
in terms of packaging, and it seems, from
reports emanating from yesterday's meeting,
that the broadcasters would "per force,
due to the recent SMS and customer choice
revelations" be pulled into some kind
of a meaningful engagement with MSOs.
The
broadcasters have to work out what is best
for them in the context of a situation in
which Cas is a reality, extension of mandatory
Cas is on the anvil and customers have shown
that they have a mind that neither MSOs
nor broadcasters have read in a manner that
would have them do business in a liberalised,
consumer-based economy.
|