|
NEW DELHI: The Indian Broadcasting Federation has sent several
pre-budget demands to the ministry of finance, including the
expansion of the definition of Industrial Undertaking under
Section 72A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to include electronic
media i.e. TV broadcasting, as well as exemption of cess charges
and additional duty on STBs.
It has also demanded that for the next 10 years, the government
must reduce the base for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) from 20
per cent to five per cent for the industry, as in the case
of computer software industry, a senior official at IBF told
indiantelevision.com.
The IBF recommendations say that for the next 10 years, the
government should exempt CVD, cess charges and additional duty
on STBs to ensure that customers get STBs at reasonable prices.
The Excise Duty should be zero to encourage indigenous production
of STBs.
The Customs and Excise Duties on all the other broadcasting
equipment should be kept at par with the IT equipment, the
IBF has demanded, seeking a level playing field for the electronic
and print media.
"We strongly recommend that the Government of India
should exempt broadcasting industry from Service Tax as in
the case of print media.
The IBF reasons that Section 72A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
provides an incentive to robust companies to take over and
amalgamate with the companies which would otherwise become
a burden on the economy.
The basic objective of Section 72A was to revive the financially
weak businesses and synergise the business to achieve better
growth, better profits, recovery of bad advances by banks
and institutions, which will result in higher tax revenues,
increase in employment ultimately leading to contribution
to the economy.
Section 72A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, defines the term
Industrial Undertaking but does not seem to cover Broadcasting
Industry.
IBF feels that when this definition was introduced, industry
was in a nascent stage and probably that is the reason it
was not included in the definition of the 'industrial undertaking'
though the print media does get covered under this definition.
"We therefore request to favourably consider the matter
and expand the definition of the term Industrial Undertaking
to include the broadcasting industry," the document said.
"There are 112 million television homes in India and
more than 68 million homes are connected to cable TV and these
are increasing rapidly," says the report in its preamble,
arguing that .forr the majority of Indians, including the
poor and non-educated people, television is the cheapest source
of information and entertainment.
According to the document, the industry produces approximately
6,00,000 hours of original programming annually for more than
300 TV channels, making it one of the biggest in the world.
There are over 50 million viewers of Indian TV programming
in neighboring countries and overseas creating a positive
international image of India unlike any other media, the document
asserts.
It argued also that the TV channels spread a sense of unity
and integrity in the country, as witnessed during Kargil War,
Gujarat earthquake, the terrorist attack on the Parliament
on December 13, 2001, the 2004 tsunami tragedy, and the most
recent train blasts in Mumbai.
On the issue of FBT too, the IBF has taken a strong stand
of being discriminated against vis-à-vis other industries.
"The Finance Act 2005 has considered 20% of the total
expenditure under certain heads as being subjected to Fringe
Benefit Tax (FBT).
"However, in industries such as pharmaceuticals, computer
software industry, hotel industry etc., the value of fringe
benefits for the purposes of computation of tax is taken at
the rate of 5 per cent, which is a clear discrimination against
television broadcasting industry," the official said,
quoting the IBF document.
Explaining the nature of the industry, especially news channels,
the document says that this involves extensive communication
(telephone/mobiles) and use of vehicles for carrying performers,
technicians, panelists, politicians and audiences and other
celebrities who appear on the channels frequently.
The news channels have to depute OB vans, cameramen and reporters
for out door coverage of events and activities. The telephone
also has to be used excessively.
(Telephone charges as part of the salary paid for by the
company to employees comes under the mischief of FBT, hence
the demand for the reduction of FBT base from 20 to five per
cent)
the IBF has also claimed a level playing field vis-à-vis
the IT industry in terms of benefits and concessions with
regard to Customs and Excise Duties.
"The Central Government, in the Ministry of Telecom
and IT have amended the Trai Act and through Notification
dated 9th January, 2004, the scope of the definition 'telecommunication
services' has been expanded to include the 'broadcasting and
cable services' also.
"Thus, for all purposes, broadcasting and cable services
are now telecommunication services," the document delineates,
hence the demand for being treated at par with the IT industry,
so far as excise and customs are concerned.
Therefore, the incentives/concessions granted to the IT sector,
should be ipso-facto extended to broadcasting/cable services
also and this may find a mention in all relevant notifications/circulars.
"For example, as of now, Customs Duty+CVD+Cess for broadcast
equipment is 36.64 per cent, whereas it is only 21.32 per
cent for computers and four per cent for cellphones,"
the document says.
"Now in the convergence era the same STB / modem can
be used for cable, DTH, IPTV and even cellphones. Therefore,
Customs Duty on broadcast equipments should be at par with
the IT Industry.
IBF says also that Customs Duty on STBs was reduced to zero
per cent in 2005, however CVD, Cess charges and additional
duty comes to 21.32 per cent
"In the interest of millions of TV households, the Government
should exempt CVD, Cess charges and additional duty on STBs
for next 10 years," it has told the Finance Ministry,
adding that in order to promote indigenous production, Excise
Duty may also be exempted for a period of 10 years.
The private Indian broadcasting Industry started only in
1992, and is still in a nascent stage.
To meet the demands of the people, a large number of new
TV channels are being launched and many of them have not been
able to reach profit-making stage, explains IBF.
The Industry is, therefore, not in a position to take the
burden of Service Tax.
The IBF document gives a detailed account of revenue and
tax burden of the broadcasting industry last fuscal:
The Total Electronic Media Advertising Revenue - Rs. 6,100
Crs. Prasar Bharti Advertising Revenue - Rs. 960 Crs.
Private Channels Advertising Revenue - Rs. 5,140 Crs.
Total Service Tax @ 12.24% on Rs. 6,100 Crs. - Rs. 747 Crs.
Service Tax Liability of Prasar Bharti - Rs. 118 Crs.
Service Tax Liability of Other Channels - Rs. 629 Crs.
Though service tax is levied on broadcasting media, print
media is not attracting service tax even though it enjoys
a larger share of advertising revenue.
Total Estimated Advt. revenue (F.Y. 05-06) Rs. 13,300 Crs.
(approx.)
Print Media Rs. 7,200 Crs. (54%)
Electronic Media Rs. 6,100 Crs. (46%)
"Further, just like a page of the newspaper, the television
screen is only a carrier of programmes and the broadcasting
media should also, therefore, be exempted from Service Tax,"
IBF has argued.
In fact, IBF has pointed out the advantage of its medium
vis-à-vis the print medium, saying that television
industry is one step ahead of print media in providing information
and education to the illiterates.
It says that for the illiterate persons, visuals and the
spoken word carry the education and information where the
written word fails. In fact, the broadcast media is the only
means to reach the illiterates which constitute 40% of our
adult population and a significant number of youngsters, says
IBF.
"We would like to, therefore, highlight this discrimination
against broadcasting media which has not been removed in spite
of our repeated representations," IBF has asserted in
its memorandum.
The IBF feels that news and current affairs channels do yeomen
service to the nation and all are free-to-air, whose only
source of revenue is advertisement.
These require huge investments in infrastructure, human resource,
etc.
There are already more than 35 news channels and more are
being launched every month, leading to scramble for the limited
ad revenue pie. Service Tax on these channels therefore slowly
lead to their deaths, IBF says.
Ad spend to GDP ratio for India is one of the lowest at 0.34
per cent.
It is 1.3 pet cent for USA, 1.0 per cent for Australia and
even our neighbouring countries in South East Asia like Malaysia,
South Korea, Singapore etc enjoy a high ratio of 0.8 to 1.0
per cent, IBF has shown in re document.
While this indicates the potential available, but without
government's support like Service Tax holiday on advertisement
revenue, the potential cannot be exploited to desired extent
IBF has also argued that Service Tax pulls down consumption
and hence economic growth. Lower consumption means lower overall
tax revenues.
"Service Tax is an unfair disadvantage for new Indian
and foreign investors," IBF has said.
The Central Government vide Notification 6/2005 dated March
1, 2005 has granted an exemption to the service providers
(small cable operators) whose aggregate value of taxable service
for a financial year does not exceed Rupees Four Lakhs.
Subscription revenue forms a significant portion of the revenue
earned by any broadcasting company/agency and contributes
to defraying the huge expense incurred on providing high quality
content to the C&S viewing population.
"It would be appreciated that the position adopted by
cable operators (of not paying the service tax to the Broadcasters
for service received by them) is causing irreparable harm
to the operations of broadcasting fraternity; and is indeed
causing revenue leakage to the government," IBF says.
|